[#539] A new discussion topic ;-) — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...>
Hi all,
[#546] Question concerning modules (1) — clemens.hintze@...
[#548] Bug: concerning Modules! — clemens.hintze@...
[#564] Ruby 1.3.7 — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
Ruby 1.3.7 is out, check out:
[#567] New feature request! :-) — clemens.hintze@...
On 6 Aug, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi,
On 6 Aug, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#590] Bug in Array#clone! — clemens.hintze@...
Hi,
Hi,
[#600] A `File' is not a `IO'????? — clemens.hintze@...
Hi,
On 10 Aug, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
Hi,
On 11 Aug, GOTO Kentaro wrote:
Hi,
On 11 Aug, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi,
[#607] How to pass by `new' method of superclass? — clemens.hintze@...
[#626] Next misbehavior (sorry :-) — clemens.hintze@...
Hi,
[#634] ANN: testsupp.rb 0.1 — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...>
Hi,
[#637] Backtrace of SIGSEGV — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...>
Hi,
Hi,
On 12 Aug, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi,
On 12 Aug, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi,
[#655] Your wish is fulfilled (erhm, almost ;-) — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...>
Hi Gotoken,
[#667] How do I use `callcc' — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...>
Hi,
[#668] Way to intercept method calls? — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...>
Hi,
[#679] Documentation about RD? — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...>
Hi,
=begin
On 18 Aug, Toshiro Kuwabara wrote:
Hi,
On 18 Aug, GOTO Kentaro wrote:
Hi,
On 19 Aug, Toshiro Kuwabara wrote:
Hi,
On 19 Aug, Toshiro Kuwabara wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
On 19 Aug, Toshiro Kuwabara wrote:
Hi
Hi,
Hi,
Hi Tosh and all,
Hi,
Hi,
Hi,
Hi,
Hi,
Hi,
Hi,
Hi,
Hi,
On 19 Aug, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi,
On 20 Aug, Toshiro Kuwabara wrote:
Hi,
On 21 Aug, Toshiro Kuwabara wrote:
Hi,
On 21 Aug, Toshiro Kuwabara wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
Hi,
On 24 Aug, Toshiro Kuwabara wrote:
Hi,
I thought people might be interested in this. Here's how I am plugging
On 31 Aug, Jonathan Aseltine wrote:
[#737] RD with multi charset — Minero Aoki <aamine@...>
Hi, I'm Minero Aoki. This is my first mail in this mailling list.
Hi,
Hi,
Hi,
Hi,
On 28 Aug, Minero Aoki wrote:
Hi,
[ruby-talk:00584] Re: lisence (Re: Re: New feature request! :-))
Hi,
In message "[ruby-talk:00580] Re: lisence (Re: Re: New feature request! :-))"
on 99/08/06, clemens.hintze@alcatel.de <clemens.hintze@alcatel.de> writes:
|> But, you still need to point where to get the source somewhere in the
|> distribution. That's required not because of my lisence, but LGPL,
|> which covers regex.[ch] in Ruby. I can agree with your condition, but
|> I can't change the LGPL condition. sigh.
|
|Which source? My extension? Ruby? regex.[ch]?
Ruby, including regex.[ch], but not necessarily your code.
|Right! So I ask you so detailed. You know, we Germans are a folk, that
|have to know things very deeply. Too deep many people say! ;-)))
Yeah, I believe in national personarity. Even though I myself is not
a typical Japanese. :-)
|> * you can redefine String's `+' method
|> * string concatenation is light enough to abandon
|
|But it let look the source ugly sometimes! I find it very nice to write:
|
| $copyright = "This software blah blah blah blah blah blah"\
| "blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah"\
| "blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah"\
| "blah blah blah blah blah blah..."
Hmm, I prefer
$copyright = <<EOS
This software blah blah blah blah blah blah
blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah
blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah
blah blah blah blah blah blah...
EOS
But I can't force you to feel like me.
|> Only if I find the way; it's too early to appreciate. ;-)
|
|Ey! "Only if I find a way; ..."???? You are the creator of Ruby! :-)
OK, I mean 'Only if I find a BEST way'.
I'm not sure yet Python way is the best way.
matz.