[#8136] Confused exception handling in Continuation Context — "Robert Dober" <robert.dober@...>

Hi all

13 messages 2006/07/06

[#8248] One-Click Installer: MinGW? or VC2005? — "Curt Hibbs" <ml.chibbs@...>

I just posted this to ruby-talk. But I would also like to discuss this

33 messages 2006/07/18
[#8264] Re: One-Click Installer: MinGW? or VC2005? — Charlie Savage <cfis@...> 2006/07/19

From my experience using both tool chains on Windows (for the ruby-prof

[#8266] Re: One-Click Installer: MinGW? or VC2005? — "Curt Hibbs" <ml.chibbs@...> 2006/07/19

Tim, I'm going to top reply since your post was so long. I'm interested in

[#8267] Re: One-Click Installer: MinGW? or VC2005? — Charlie Savage <cfis@...> 2006/07/19

> Tim, I'm going to top reply since your post was so long. I'm interested in

[#8271] my sandboxing extension!! — why the lucky stiff <ruby-core@...>

I have (what feels like) very exciting news. I finally sat down to code up my

17 messages 2006/07/19

[#8430] Re: doc patch: weakref. — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...>

> -----Original Message-----

19 messages 2006/07/28
[#8434] Re: doc patch: weakref. — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/07/29

Hi,

[#8436] Re: doc patch: weakref. — Daniel Berger <djberg96@...> 2006/07/29

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#8437] Re: doc patch: weakref. — Mauricio Fernandez <mfp@...> 2006/07/29

On Sat, Jul 29, 2006 at 07:37:24PM +0900, Daniel Berger wrote:

[#8441] Inconsistency in scoping during module_eval? — "Charles O Nutter" <headius@...>

I have the following code:

18 messages 2006/07/30
[#8442] Re: Inconsistency in scoping during module_eval? — nobu@... 2006/07/30

Hi,

[#8443] Re: Inconsistency in scoping during module_eval? — "Charles O Nutter" <headius@...> 2006/07/30

Why does this:

[#8445] Re: Inconsistency in scoping during module_eval? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/07/30

Hi,

[#8454] Re: Inconsistency in scoping during module_eval? — "Charles O Nutter" <headius@...> 2006/07/31

So to clarify...

Re: Trace API bug

From: nobu@...
Date: 2006-07-30 05:05:15 UTC
List: ruby-core #8440
Hi,

At Fri, 21 Jul 2006 14:04:41 +0900,
Kent Sibilev wrote in [ruby-core:08330]:
> Does this patch make any sense?

Seems good, but extracting BLOCK always by Data_Get_Struct()
might be less efficient a little.


Index: eval.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/ruby/src/ruby/eval.c,v
retrieving revision 1.616.2.185
diff -p -U 2 -r1.616.2.185 eval.c
--- eval.c	24 Jul 2006 13:04:39 -0000	1.616.2.185
+++ eval.c	30 Jul 2006 02:50:37 -0000
@@ -5839,5 +5839,13 @@ rb_call0(klass, recv, id, oid, argc, arg
       case NODE_BMETHOD:
 	ruby_frame->flags |= FRAME_DMETH;
+	if (event_hooks) {
+	    struct BLOCK *data;
+	    Data_Get_Struct(body->nd_cval, struct BLOCK, data);
+	    EXEC_EVENT_HOOK(RUBY_EVENT_CALL, data->body, recv, id, klass);
+	}
 	result = proc_invoke(body->nd_cval, rb_ary_new4(argc, argv), recv, klass);
+	if (event_hooks) {
+	    EXEC_EVENT_HOOK(RUBY_EVENT_RETURN, body, recv, id, klass);
+	}
 	break;
 


-- 
Nobu Nakada

In This Thread

Prev Next