[#8136] Confused exception handling in Continuation Context — "Robert Dober" <robert.dober@...>

Hi all

13 messages 2006/07/06

[#8248] One-Click Installer: MinGW? or VC2005? — "Curt Hibbs" <ml.chibbs@...>

I just posted this to ruby-talk. But I would also like to discuss this

33 messages 2006/07/18
[#8264] Re: One-Click Installer: MinGW? or VC2005? — Charlie Savage <cfis@...> 2006/07/19

From my experience using both tool chains on Windows (for the ruby-prof

[#8266] Re: One-Click Installer: MinGW? or VC2005? — "Curt Hibbs" <ml.chibbs@...> 2006/07/19

Tim, I'm going to top reply since your post was so long. I'm interested in

[#8267] Re: One-Click Installer: MinGW? or VC2005? — Charlie Savage <cfis@...> 2006/07/19

> Tim, I'm going to top reply since your post was so long. I'm interested in

[#8271] my sandboxing extension!! — why the lucky stiff <ruby-core@...>

I have (what feels like) very exciting news. I finally sat down to code up my

17 messages 2006/07/19

[#8430] Re: doc patch: weakref. — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...>

> -----Original Message-----

19 messages 2006/07/28
[#8434] Re: doc patch: weakref. — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/07/29

Hi,

[#8436] Re: doc patch: weakref. — Daniel Berger <djberg96@...> 2006/07/29

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#8437] Re: doc patch: weakref. — Mauricio Fernandez <mfp@...> 2006/07/29

On Sat, Jul 29, 2006 at 07:37:24PM +0900, Daniel Berger wrote:

[#8441] Inconsistency in scoping during module_eval? — "Charles O Nutter" <headius@...>

I have the following code:

18 messages 2006/07/30
[#8442] Re: Inconsistency in scoping during module_eval? — nobu@... 2006/07/30

Hi,

[#8443] Re: Inconsistency in scoping during module_eval? — "Charles O Nutter" <headius@...> 2006/07/30

Why does this:

[#8445] Re: Inconsistency in scoping during module_eval? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/07/30

Hi,

[#8454] Re: Inconsistency in scoping during module_eval? — "Charles O Nutter" <headius@...> 2006/07/31

So to clarify...

Re: [BUG] thread/sync.rb memory corruption

From: ara.t.howard@...
Date: 2006-07-06 15:44:50 UTC
List: ruby-core #8151
On Fri, 7 Jul 2006, Hugh Sasse wrote:

> On Thu, 6 Jul 2006, URABE Shyouhei wrote:
>
>> Could someone please confirm this can be reproduced on 1.8.5 pre1?
>
> brains hgs 123 %> ./!$
> ./syncbug.rb
> ruby 1.8.5 (2006-07-04) [sparc-solaris2.9]
>
> brains hgs 124 %>
>
> That blank line was just me hitting return, after about a second.
> It exited immediately.  I don't have electric fence to hand.

if you don't have electric fence you'll need to run for quite a long time to
see the code begin to leak - pull up top while you're running if you can to
confirm

i'm trying to test on my box now but stable-snapshot won't build for me.  i'm
getting

   gcc -I. -I../.. -I../../. -I../.././ext/dl -DHAVE_DLFCN_H -DHAVE_DLOPEN -DHAVE_DLCLOSE -DHAVE_DLSYM -DHAVE_DLERROR  -I. -fPIC -g -O2 -fno-defer-pop -fno-omit-frame-pointer  -c cfunc.c
   cfunc.c:46: warning: `struct cfunc_data' declared inside parameter list
   cfunc.c:46: warning: its scope is only this definition or declaration, which
   is probably not what you want
   cfunc.c: In function `dlcfunc_free':
   cfunc.c:48: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type
   cfunc.c:49: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type


while compiling ext/dl

anyone?


cheers.

-a
-- 
suffering increases your inner strength.  also, the wishing for suffering
makes the suffering disappear.
- h.h. the 14th dali lama

In This Thread