[#8136] Confused exception handling in Continuation Context — "Robert Dober" <robert.dober@...>

Hi all

13 messages 2006/07/06

[#8248] One-Click Installer: MinGW? or VC2005? — "Curt Hibbs" <ml.chibbs@...>

I just posted this to ruby-talk. But I would also like to discuss this

33 messages 2006/07/18
[#8264] Re: One-Click Installer: MinGW? or VC2005? — Charlie Savage <cfis@...> 2006/07/19

From my experience using both tool chains on Windows (for the ruby-prof

[#8266] Re: One-Click Installer: MinGW? or VC2005? — "Curt Hibbs" <ml.chibbs@...> 2006/07/19

Tim, I'm going to top reply since your post was so long. I'm interested in

[#8267] Re: One-Click Installer: MinGW? or VC2005? — Charlie Savage <cfis@...> 2006/07/19

> Tim, I'm going to top reply since your post was so long. I'm interested in

[#8271] my sandboxing extension!! — why the lucky stiff <ruby-core@...>

I have (what feels like) very exciting news. I finally sat down to code up my

17 messages 2006/07/19

[#8430] Re: doc patch: weakref. — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...>

> -----Original Message-----

19 messages 2006/07/28
[#8434] Re: doc patch: weakref. — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/07/29

Hi,

[#8436] Re: doc patch: weakref. — Daniel Berger <djberg96@...> 2006/07/29

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#8437] Re: doc patch: weakref. — Mauricio Fernandez <mfp@...> 2006/07/29

On Sat, Jul 29, 2006 at 07:37:24PM +0900, Daniel Berger wrote:

[#8441] Inconsistency in scoping during module_eval? — "Charles O Nutter" <headius@...>

I have the following code:

18 messages 2006/07/30
[#8442] Re: Inconsistency in scoping during module_eval? — nobu@... 2006/07/30

Hi,

[#8443] Re: Inconsistency in scoping during module_eval? — "Charles O Nutter" <headius@...> 2006/07/30

Why does this:

[#8445] Re: Inconsistency in scoping during module_eval? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/07/30

Hi,

[#8454] Re: Inconsistency in scoping during module_eval? — "Charles O Nutter" <headius@...> 2006/07/31

So to clarify...

.document patch

From: Hugh Sasse <hgs@...>
Date: 2006-07-26 17:14:24 UTC
List: ruby-core #8412
The intent of the patch below is to improve the coverage of the rdoc
output produced by make install-doc.  It was created with this file
(.fix.doc.rb):

<quote>
#!/usr/local/bin/ruby -w

$documents = []
$files = []
$debug = false

open(".document", "r") do |f|
  while not f.eof?
    line = f.readline
    puts "line is #{line}" if $debug
    next if line =~ /^\s*(?:#.*)?$/
    $documents << line.chomp
  end
end

$files += %x{ls}.split(/\n/)

puts "documents is #{$documents.inspect}" if $debug
puts "files is #{$files.inspect}" if $debug
$files.each do |file|
  puts file unless $documents.include?(file)
end
<quote>

and by sorting the results into .document.  This is a patch against the 
stable snapshot.

        HTH
        Hugh

--- ./lib/.document.orig        2006-07-25 08:33:03.000000000 +0100
+++ ./lib/.document     2006-07-26 18:02:40.914074000 +0100
@@ -7,35 +7,85 @@
 # But for now

 English.rb
+Env.rb
+README
 abbrev.rb
 base64.rb
 benchmark.rb
 cgi
+cgi-lib.rb
 cgi.rb
 complex.rb
+csv.rb
+date
 date.rb
+date2.rb
+debug.rb
 delegate.rb
+drb
+drb.rb
+e2mmap.rb
 erb.rb
+eregex.rb
 fileutils.rb
+finalize.rb
 find.rb
 forwardable.rb
+ftools.rb
 generator.rb
 getoptlong.rb
+getopts.rb
+gserver.rb
+importenv.rb
+ipaddr.rb
+irb
+irb.rb
+jcode.rb
 logger.rb
+mailread.rb
+mathn.rb
 matrix.rb
+mkmf.rb
 monitor.rb
+mutex_m.rb
+net
 observer.rb
+open-uri.rb
+open3.rb
+optparse
 optparse.rb
+ostruct.rb
+parsearg.rb
+parsedate.rb
 pathname.rb
+ping.rb
 pp.rb
 prettyprint.rb
+profile.rb
+profiler.rb
 pstore.rb
+racc
 rational.rb
+rdoc
+readbytes.rb
+resolv-replace.rb
+resolv.rb
+rexml
 rinda
+rss
+rss.rb
+rubyunit.rb
+runit
+scanf.rb
 set.rb
+shell
+shell.rb
 shellwords.rb
 singleton.rb
+soap
+sync.rb
 tempfile.rb
+test
 test/unit.rb
 test/unit/assertions.rb
 thread.rb
@@ -43,5 +93,16 @@
 time.rb
 timeout.rb
 tmpdir.rb
+tracer.rb
+tsort.rb
+un.rb
 uri
+uri.rb
+weakref.rb
+webrick
+webrick.rb
+wsdl
+xmlrpc
+xsd
+yaml
 yaml.rb



In This Thread

Prev Next