From: Justin Bailey <jgbailey@...>
Date: 2006-07-15T01:42:31+09:00
Subject: Re: Unexpected pointer behavior with unpack

------=_Part_39371_10895156.1152895349143
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

On 7/14/06, nobu@ruby-lang.org <nobu@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
>
>
> Since the result string will be tainted, so the original string
> also will be tainted implicitly.  But now I about to think it
> should be tainted too.


Does that mean unpacking from nested pointers will work and I was seeing a
security error  previously? Or does this just tighten up the "tainting"
model?

Thanks for your time so far!

Justin

------=_Part_39371_10895156.1152895349143--