[#8136] Confused exception handling in Continuation Context — "Robert Dober" <robert.dober@...>

Hi all

13 messages 2006/07/06

[#8248] One-Click Installer: MinGW? or VC2005? — "Curt Hibbs" <ml.chibbs@...>

I just posted this to ruby-talk. But I would also like to discuss this

33 messages 2006/07/18
[#8264] Re: One-Click Installer: MinGW? or VC2005? — Charlie Savage <cfis@...> 2006/07/19

From my experience using both tool chains on Windows (for the ruby-prof

[#8266] Re: One-Click Installer: MinGW? or VC2005? — "Curt Hibbs" <ml.chibbs@...> 2006/07/19

Tim, I'm going to top reply since your post was so long. I'm interested in

[#8267] Re: One-Click Installer: MinGW? or VC2005? — Charlie Savage <cfis@...> 2006/07/19

> Tim, I'm going to top reply since your post was so long. I'm interested in

[#8271] my sandboxing extension!! — why the lucky stiff <ruby-core@...>

I have (what feels like) very exciting news. I finally sat down to code up my

17 messages 2006/07/19

[#8430] Re: doc patch: weakref. — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...>

> -----Original Message-----

19 messages 2006/07/28
[#8434] Re: doc patch: weakref. — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/07/29

Hi,

[#8436] Re: doc patch: weakref. — Daniel Berger <djberg96@...> 2006/07/29

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#8437] Re: doc patch: weakref. — Mauricio Fernandez <mfp@...> 2006/07/29

On Sat, Jul 29, 2006 at 07:37:24PM +0900, Daniel Berger wrote:

[#8441] Inconsistency in scoping during module_eval? — "Charles O Nutter" <headius@...>

I have the following code:

18 messages 2006/07/30
[#8442] Re: Inconsistency in scoping during module_eval? — nobu@... 2006/07/30

Hi,

[#8443] Re: Inconsistency in scoping during module_eval? — "Charles O Nutter" <headius@...> 2006/07/30

Why does this:

[#8445] Re: Inconsistency in scoping during module_eval? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/07/30

Hi,

[#8454] Re: Inconsistency in scoping during module_eval? — "Charles O Nutter" <headius@...> 2006/07/31

So to clarify...

Re: [Bug?] Confused exception handling in Continuation Context

From: "Robert Dober" <robert.dober@...>
Date: 2006-07-06 18:33:12 UTC
List: ruby-core #8157
On 7/6/06, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> In message "Re: [Bug?] Confused exception handling in Continuation
> Context"
>     on Fri, 7 Jul 2006 02:42:35 +0900, "Robert Dober" <
> robert.dober@gmail.com> writes:
>
> |I have the feeling that my limitted understanding of continuations puts
> you
> |off the track. As a matter of fact I do not complain that there is an
> |exception, this exception is intentional, I complain that it is
> |handled/rescued when it shall not.
>
> This is the point.  A continuation is like a time machine.  By calling
> it, time would rewind back to the point of callcc, including context,
> call stack, etc.  This means, despite your expectation, the exception
> you're complaining is raised in the _first_ call of will_raise, not
> the second one.
>
>                                                         matz.
>
>
I see, you are serious about it ;)
I will try to take this to ruby-talk as I really fail to understand, but I
except the statement as a fact :( and this might potentially be all I need
to understand it.

Thank you for your patience.

Robert

-- 
Deux choses sont infinies : l'univers et la b黎ise humaine

As I just prooved ;)

en ce qui concerne l'univers, je n'en ai pas acquis la certitude absolue.

- Albert Einstein

In This Thread