[#8123] Unit/Regression tests for Ruby builtin classes and modules — Wayne Kelly <w.kelly@...>
[#8129] segmentation fault while evaluating printf:Kernel — <noreply@...>
Bugs item #4949, was opened at 2006-07-05 18:03
[#8131] thread mystery — ara.t.howard@...
[#8132] rdoc, C extensions, stop and start — "Daniel Berger" <Daniel.Berger@...>
Hi,
[#8136] Confused exception handling in Continuation Context — "Robert Dober" <robert.dober@...>
Hi all
Robert Dober schrieb:
On 7/6/06, Pit Capitain <pit@capitain.de> wrote:
Hi,
[#8142] thread/sync.rb memory corruption — ara.t.howard@...
Could someone please confirm this can be reproduced on 1.8.5 pre1?
On Thu, 6 Jul 2006, URABE Shyouhei wrote:
[#8167] bug in printf — <noreply@...>
Bugs item #4970, was opened at 2006-07-07 14:18
Hi,
On 7/25/06, nobu@ruby-lang.org <nobu@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
Hi,
[#8169] next in ensure body (Ruby 1.8.x) — "Dominik Bathon" <dbatml@...>
Hi,
[#8180] Called method not removed after remove_method — <noreply@...>
Bugs item #4998, was opened at 2006-07-09 13:20
[#8194] rss patch -- mostly doc, plus English adjustments. — Hugh Sasse <hgs@...>
This is a patch set against the stable snapshot.
Hi,
[#8196] SONY VIAOLAPTOP-------------$750USD,NOKIA N93-------------------$250USD — <noreply@...>
Bugs item #5032, was opened at 2006-07-12 18:41
I think this is more of an enhancement...
> Subject: Re: [ ruby-Bugs-5032 ] SONY
[#8201] Please implement expect.rb for Windows Ruby — <noreply@...>
Bugs item #5036, was opened at 2006-07-12 14:44
Hi,
Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi,
[#8203] Re: [PATCH] --fqname option to test/unit/autorunner.rb — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...>
> -----Original Message-----
Thanks again for getting back to me. Perhaps my original focus on the
[#8222] Rdoc patch for lib/prettyprint.rb — Hugh Sasse <hgs@...>
This is a first pass at converting the RDTool docs for lib/prettyprint.rb
[#8223] Unexpected pointer behavior with unpack — "Justin Bailey" <jgbailey@...>
I have had the opportunity to work [1] a lot with Ruby's ability to create
[#8229] open-uri fails under multithreading — <noreply@...>
Bugs item #5067, was opened at 2006-07-14 19:11
[#8243] tuplespace - make comments visible to rdoc. — Hugh Sasse <hgs@...>
comments in rdoc conventionally don't start with two # marks and don't
On Jul 17, 2006, at 10:09 AM, Hugh Sasse wrote:
That 'doesn't add anything' is meant to the last paragraph, as i understood it.
On Tue, 18 Jul 2006, Jan Svitok wrote:
[#8248] One-Click Installer: MinGW? or VC2005? — "Curt Hibbs" <ml.chibbs@...>
I just posted this to ruby-talk. But I would also like to discuss this
Dear Curt,
On 7/20/06, Kaspar Schiess <eule@space.ch> wrote:
I was wondering if the toolchain could be built around rake?
The One-Click Ruby Installer's build process is, in fact, controlled via
From my experience using both tool chains on Windows (for the ruby-prof
Tim, I'm going to top reply since your post was so long. I'm interested in
> Tim, I'm going to top reply since your post was so long. I'm interested in
On 7/19/06, Charlie Savage <cfis@savagexi.com> wrote:
Curt Hibbs wrote:
On 7/19/06, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky <znmeb@cesmail.net> wrote:
Hello,
[#8262] Instability around popen due to missing rb_thread_atfork — <noreply@...>
Patches item #5111, was opened at 2006-07-18 22:36
Hi,
On 19 Jul 2006, at 8:25, <nobu@ruby-lang.org> <nobu@ruby-lang.org>
[#8271] my sandboxing extension!! — why the lucky stiff <ruby-core@...>
I have (what feels like) very exciting news. I finally sat down to code up my
On Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 06:40:34PM +0900, why the lucky stiff wrote:
On Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 08:00:15PM +0900, Mauricio Fernandez wrote:
On Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 11:18:27PM +0900, why the lucky stiff wrote:
Okay, it turns out that, in order for this to work, I also need the following
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 20, 2006 at 03:11:34PM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi,
On 7/20/06, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#8273] Regular-Expressions Problem/Bug — Reto Schuettel <reto-ruby-core@...>
Hi
On Wed, 19 Jul 2006, Reto Schuettel wrote:
Hi
>>>>> "R" == Reto Schuettel <reto-ruby-core@schuettel.ch> writes:
[#8299] Interest in NTLM/Negotiate patch for net/http? — "Justin Bailey" <jgbailey@...>
My workplace recently installed Microsoft's ISA server, which proxies all
On Jul 19, 2006, at 5:01 PM, Justin Bailey wrote:
[#8331] (Fwd) Re: Patch to Ruby in 2005 — "John Fletcher" <J.P.Fletcher@...>
Hi
Hi,
On Fri, 21 Jul 2006, nobu@ruby-lang.org wrote:
[#8379] rdoc grows to large size. — Hugh Sasse <hgs@...>
While working on that .document patch I noticed that rdoc grew to
On Jul 24, 2006, at 6:09 AM, Hugh Sasse wrote:
[#8394] Re: rdoc grows to large size. — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...>
> -----Original Message-----
[#8423] doc patch: readbytes.rb — Hugh Sasse <hgs@...>
A patch against the stable snapshot.
[#8427] RDoc picking up comments from function prototypes — Tilman Sauerbeck <tilman@...>
Hi,
Tilman Sauerbeck [2006-07-29 02:39]:
On Aug 9, 2006, at 9:52 AM, Tilman Sauerbeck wrote:
[#8430] Re: doc patch: weakref. — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...>
> -----Original Message-----
Hi,
Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
On Sat, Jul 29, 2006 at 07:37:24PM +0900, Daniel Berger wrote:
On Sun, 30 Jul 2006, Mauricio Fernandez wrote:
On Jul 31, 2006, at 3:20 AM, Hugh Sasse wrote:
On Tue, 1 Aug 2006, Eric Hodel wrote:
On Aug 1, 2006, at 2:13 AM, Hugh Sasse wrote:
[#8441] Inconsistency in scoping during module_eval? — "Charles O Nutter" <headius@...>
I have the following code:
Hi,
Why does this:
Hi,
So to clarify...
I don't want to take this thread off-course, but what I meant was
On Mon, 31 Jul 2006, Matt Todd wrote:
On 7/30/06, Mathieu Bouchard <matju@artengine.ca> wrote:
Awesome. Thank you very much for your responses. Curious. I knew a
On 7/31/06, Matt Todd <chiology@gmail.com> wrote:
[#8447] #if should be #ifdef in ruby.h — <noreply@...>
Bugs item #5243, was opened at 2006-07-30 16:31
noreply@rubyforge.org wrote:
[#8466] Multi-Line Date Formate Patch — James Edward Gray II <james@...>
It was pointed out to me that the following code is surprising:
On Jul 31, 2006, at 8:26 AM, James Edward Gray II wrote:
Hi,
Re: [BUG] thread/sync.rb memory corruption
On Fri, 7 Jul 2006, ara.t.howard@noaa.gov wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Jul 2006, Hugh Sasse wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 6 Jul 2006, URABE Shyouhei wrote:
> >
> > > Could someone please confirm this can be reproduced on 1.8.5 pre1?
> >
> > brains hgs 123 %> ./!$
> > ./syncbug.rb
> > ruby 1.8.5 (2006-07-04) [sparc-solaris2.9]
> >
> > brains hgs 124 %>
> >
> > That blank line was just me hitting return, after about a second.
> > It exited immediately. I don't have electric fence to hand.
>
> if you don't have electric fence you'll need to run for quite a long time to
> see the code begin to leak - pull up top while you're running if you can to
> confirm
Oh! I see. I was thinking that the gets was to keep the console open
on platforms that needed it, and that it would not exit until it reached
that.
But it's threaded...
brains hgs 141 %> ./syncbug.rb
ruby 1.8.2 (2004-12-25) [sparc-solaris2.9]
^C./syncbug.rb:125:in `gets': Interrupt
from ./syncbug.rb:125
brains hgs 142 %> vim !$
vim ./syncbug.rb
brains hgs 143 %> ./syncbug.rb
ruby 1.8.5 (2006-07-04) [sparc-solaris2.9]
^C./syncbug.rb:125:in `gets': Interrupt
from ./syncbug.rb:125
brains hgs 144 %>
I see increases in memory of the order of Megabytes within a couple of
minutes, for both cases.. What else can I look at?
brains hgs 146 %> truss -fci ./syncbug.rb
ruby 1.8.5 (2006-07-04) [sparc-solaris2.9]
^C./syncbug.rb:125:in `gets': Interrupt
from ./syncbug.rb:125
signals ------------
SIGVTALRM 5961
total: 5961
syscall seconds calls errors
read .002 16
write .000 1
open .000 7
close .000 14
brk .021 294
stat .003 42 30
getuid .000 3
fstat .000 7
getgid .000 3
ioctl .000 1
execve .000 1
poll .247 4060
sigprocmask .000 4
sigaction .000 13
sigfillset .000 1
getcontext .000 1
setcontext .513 5961
evsys .000 1
evtrapret .000 1
mmap .001 18
munmap .001 5
getrlimit .000 1
memcntl .000 4
setitimer .000 1
llseek .000 7
resolvepath .000 8
stat64 .000 11 9
fstat64 .000 3
getrlimit64 .000 1
open64 .000 7
-------- ------ ----
sys totals: .797 10497 39
usr time: 58.173
elapsed: 61.510
brains hgs 147 %>
and I got 39 errors for just truss -c.
The Process class can't query its size. I can't see how to extract that
from /proc either.
>
> i'm trying to test on my box now but stable-snapshot won't build for me. i'm
> getting
>
> gcc -I. -I../.. -I../../. -I../.././ext/dl -DHAVE_DLFCN_H -DHAVE_DLOPEN
> -DHAVE_DLCLOSE -DHAVE_DLSYM -DHAVE_DLERROR -I. -fPIC -g -O2 -fno-defer-pop
> -fno-omit-frame-pointer -c cfunc.c
> cfunc.c:46: warning: `struct cfunc_data' declared inside parameter list
> cfunc.c:46: warning: its scope is only this definition or declaration, which
> is probably not what you want
> cfunc.c: In function `dlcfunc_free':
> cfunc.c:48: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type
> cfunc.c:49: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type
>
>
> while compiling ext/dl
>
> anyone?
I don't know about that.
>
>
> cheers.
>
> -a
Hugh