[#8136] Confused exception handling in Continuation Context — "Robert Dober" <robert.dober@...>

Hi all

13 messages 2006/07/06

[#8248] One-Click Installer: MinGW? or VC2005? — "Curt Hibbs" <ml.chibbs@...>

I just posted this to ruby-talk. But I would also like to discuss this

33 messages 2006/07/18
[#8264] Re: One-Click Installer: MinGW? or VC2005? — Charlie Savage <cfis@...> 2006/07/19

From my experience using both tool chains on Windows (for the ruby-prof

[#8266] Re: One-Click Installer: MinGW? or VC2005? — "Curt Hibbs" <ml.chibbs@...> 2006/07/19

Tim, I'm going to top reply since your post was so long. I'm interested in

[#8267] Re: One-Click Installer: MinGW? or VC2005? — Charlie Savage <cfis@...> 2006/07/19

> Tim, I'm going to top reply since your post was so long. I'm interested in

[#8271] my sandboxing extension!! — why the lucky stiff <ruby-core@...>

I have (what feels like) very exciting news. I finally sat down to code up my

17 messages 2006/07/19

[#8430] Re: doc patch: weakref. — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...>

> -----Original Message-----

19 messages 2006/07/28
[#8434] Re: doc patch: weakref. — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/07/29

Hi,

[#8436] Re: doc patch: weakref. — Daniel Berger <djberg96@...> 2006/07/29

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#8437] Re: doc patch: weakref. — Mauricio Fernandez <mfp@...> 2006/07/29

On Sat, Jul 29, 2006 at 07:37:24PM +0900, Daniel Berger wrote:

[#8441] Inconsistency in scoping during module_eval? — "Charles O Nutter" <headius@...>

I have the following code:

18 messages 2006/07/30
[#8442] Re: Inconsistency in scoping during module_eval? — nobu@... 2006/07/30

Hi,

[#8443] Re: Inconsistency in scoping during module_eval? — "Charles O Nutter" <headius@...> 2006/07/30

Why does this:

[#8445] Re: Inconsistency in scoping during module_eval? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/07/30

Hi,

[#8454] Re: Inconsistency in scoping during module_eval? — "Charles O Nutter" <headius@...> 2006/07/31

So to clarify...

Process.getrlimit, setrlimit, and a request

From: Daniel Berger <djberg96@...>
Date: 2006-07-22 09:51:36 UTC
List: ruby-core #8356
Hi,

I've had a package out on the RAA for a while (since September, 2004)
called proc-wait3.  This package added the Process.getrlimit and
Process.setrlimit methods, among others, to the Process module.

I noticed that these methods have been added in Ruby 1.8.5.  The API in
Ruby 1.8.5 is not quite the same as what I have, however.

In the interests of Galactic Peace, and to avoid confusing the users, I
think it would be best if I simply did a copy/paste of those methods
from process.c into the proc-wait3 package.  Thus, users who are using
Ruby 1.8.4 or earlier would get an identical API (and documentation) to
what the 1.8.5 branch has.

The pseudocode for wait3.c would simply be:

#ifndef RUBY_HAS_RLIMIT
/* Add my stuff */
#else
/* Add nothing related to getrlimit, setrlimit, use Ruby's stuff */
#endif

May I have your permission to copy/paste the current code (and docs) for
getrlimit and setrlimit into the proc-wait3 package?  With proper
attributions, of course.

Regards,

Dan





In This Thread

Prev Next