[#8136] Confused exception handling in Continuation Context — "Robert Dober" <robert.dober@...>

Hi all

13 messages 2006/07/06

[#8248] One-Click Installer: MinGW? or VC2005? — "Curt Hibbs" <ml.chibbs@...>

I just posted this to ruby-talk. But I would also like to discuss this

33 messages 2006/07/18
[#8264] Re: One-Click Installer: MinGW? or VC2005? — Charlie Savage <cfis@...> 2006/07/19

From my experience using both tool chains on Windows (for the ruby-prof

[#8266] Re: One-Click Installer: MinGW? or VC2005? — "Curt Hibbs" <ml.chibbs@...> 2006/07/19

Tim, I'm going to top reply since your post was so long. I'm interested in

[#8267] Re: One-Click Installer: MinGW? or VC2005? — Charlie Savage <cfis@...> 2006/07/19

> Tim, I'm going to top reply since your post was so long. I'm interested in

[#8271] my sandboxing extension!! — why the lucky stiff <ruby-core@...>

I have (what feels like) very exciting news. I finally sat down to code up my

17 messages 2006/07/19

[#8430] Re: doc patch: weakref. — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...>

> -----Original Message-----

19 messages 2006/07/28
[#8434] Re: doc patch: weakref. — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/07/29

Hi,

[#8436] Re: doc patch: weakref. — Daniel Berger <djberg96@...> 2006/07/29

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#8437] Re: doc patch: weakref. — Mauricio Fernandez <mfp@...> 2006/07/29

On Sat, Jul 29, 2006 at 07:37:24PM +0900, Daniel Berger wrote:

[#8441] Inconsistency in scoping during module_eval? — "Charles O Nutter" <headius@...>

I have the following code:

18 messages 2006/07/30
[#8442] Re: Inconsistency in scoping during module_eval? — nobu@... 2006/07/30

Hi,

[#8443] Re: Inconsistency in scoping during module_eval? — "Charles O Nutter" <headius@...> 2006/07/30

Why does this:

[#8445] Re: Inconsistency in scoping during module_eval? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/07/30

Hi,

[#8454] Re: Inconsistency in scoping during module_eval? — "Charles O Nutter" <headius@...> 2006/07/31

So to clarify...

Re: rdoc grows to large size.

From: "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...>
Date: 2006-07-25 16:56:34 UTC
List: ruby-core #8394
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Eric Hodel [mailto:drbrain@segment7.net] 
> Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2006 10:53 AM
> To: ruby-core@ruby-lang.org
> Subject: Re: rdoc grows to large size.
> 
> 
> On Jul 25, 2006, at 3:21 AM, Hugh Sasse wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, 25 Jul 2006, Charles O Nutter wrote:
> >
> >> I've studied the rdoc code a bit (only so much as to maintain my
> >> sanity) and wondered aloud: is this all hand-written, hand- 
> >> optimized code? It did not
> >
> > I've not heard any different.
> 
> It was written by Dave Thomas.
> 
> >> appear to be generated, and I have seen hand-rolled patches
> >> trickle in over time. Is there perhaps a better way to parse all  
> >> that content and generate those docs that would not 
> require a hand- 
> >> made implementation?
> >
> > Such as what?  The only ruby parsers that exist are the C 
> one and the 
> > JRuby one.
> 
> And the IRB one.
> 
> > I suppose one might clone these, then modify them to extract
> > information from comments as well as code.  I think it would be  
> > nontrivial, which is probably why people are satisfied with what  
> > works well at present.
> 
> Comment nodes could be added to Ruby's interpreter, but I think matz  
> has given some reason or another why they aren't in the AST.

If only Rockit 0.8.0 were here....

Robert Feldt, save us from the regular expression horror of rdoc!!!

- Dan


This communication is the property of Qwest and may contain confidential or
privileged information. Unauthorized use of this communication is strictly 
prohibited and may be unlawful.  If you have received this communication 
in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply e-mail and destroy 
all copies of the communication and any attachments.


In This Thread

Prev Next