From: Tim Morgan <tmorgan99@...>
Date: 2006-07-21T07:04:10+09:00
Subject: Re: One-Click Installer: MinGW? or VC2005?

------=_Part_47850_28810124.1153433046721
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

I was rather hoping the Rake's reach could extend to the be a compelling
platform for extension authors.  Sort of get into the stream in place of
mkmf.


On 7/20/06, Curt Hibbs <ml.chibbs@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> The One-Click Ruby Installer's build process is, in fact, controlled via
> Rake. However, since the OCI is basically an aggregation of other
> packages,
> those packages are built with whatever tool he author of tht package used
> (which is called by the OCI's rake file).
>
> Curt
>
>
> On 7/20/06, Tim Morgan <tmorgan99@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > I was wondering if the toolchain could be built around rake?
> > rake is Ruby's make, but you make ruby in (n)make?
> >
> >
> > There is one major hole in the build processes for the one-click
> installer
> > > that I want to fix along with this compiler transition -- tests for
> the
> > > included extensions -- there aren't any. This needs to change. For
> each
> > > included extension there needs to be at least a few basic automated
> > tests
> > > to
> > > ensure that the extension is functioning properly. If anyone wants to
> > > volunteer to help with this, please email me (curt at hibbs dot com)
> and
> > > I'll hold your name in reserve until I get to that point.
> > >
> > > Curt
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>

------=_Part_47850_28810124.1153433046721--