ruby-core

Mailing Lists

ruby-list (For Ruby users, JA) ruby-dev (For Ruby developers, JA) ruby-core (For Ruby developers, EN) ruby-talk (For Ruby users, EN)
2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

[#8118] ri crash after running rdoc on ActiveSupport — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #4912, was opened at 2006-07-02 05:08

2 messages 2006/07/02
[#8119] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-4912 ] ri crash after running rdoc on ActiveSupport — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2006/07/02

On Jul 1, 2006, at 10:08 PM, <noreply@rubyforge.org>

[#8120] ruby 1.9 HEAD 64 bit warnings clean up — ville.mattila@...

Hello,

1 message 2006/07/03

[#8123] Unit/Regression tests for Ruby builtin classes and modules — Wayne Kelly <w.kelly@...>

4 messages 2006/07/04
[#8124] Re: Unit/Regression tests for Ruby builtin classes and modules — Daniel Berger <djberg96@...> 2006/07/04

--- Wayne Kelly <w.kelly@qut.edu.au> wrote:
[#8125] Re: Unit/Regression tests for Ruby builtin classes and modules — "Charles O Nutter" <headius@...> 2006/07/04

I would seriously *love* to see a combined effort on creating a
[#8126] Re: Unit/Regression tests for Ruby builtin classes and modules — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2006/07/04

On Jul 3, 2006, at 7:15 PM, Wayne Kelly wrote:

[#8127] Build target for core lib only? — "Daniel Berger" <Daniel.Berger@...>

Hi,

2 messages 2006/07/05
[#8162] Re: Build target for core lib only? — nobu@... 2006/07/07

Hi,

[#8128] Patch for time.c — "Daniel Berger" <Daniel.Berger@...>

Hi,

1 message 2006/07/05

[#8129] segmentation fault while evaluating printf:Kernel — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #4949, was opened at 2006-07-05 18:03

4 messages 2006/07/05
[#8130] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-4949 ] segmentation fault while evaluating printf:Kernel — "Daniel Berger" <Daniel.Berger@...> 2006/07/05

noreply@rubyforge.org wrote:
[#8134] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-4949 ] segmentation fault while evaluating printf:Kernel — Tom Copeland <tom@...> 2006/07/05

On Thu, 2006-07-06 at 03:15 +0900, Daniel Berger wrote:
[#8186] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-4949 ] segmentation fault while evaluating printf:Kernel — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/07/10

Hi,

[#8131] thread mystery — ara.t.howard@...

4 messages 2006/07/05
[#8143] Re: thread mystery — Sean Russell <ser@...> 2006/07/06

On Wednesday 05 July 2006 17:30, ara.t.howard@noaa.gov wrote:
[#8144] Re: thread mystery — ara.t.howard@... 2006/07/06

On Thu, 6 Jul 2006, Sean Russell wrote:
[#8135] Re: thread mystery — Hugh Sasse <hgs@...> 2006/07/06

On Thu, 6 Jul 2006, ara.t.howard@noaa.gov wrote:

[#8132] rdoc, C extensions, stop and start — "Daniel Berger" <Daniel.Berger@...>

Hi,

4 messages 2006/07/05
[#8158] Re: [PATCH] rdoc, C extensions, stop and start — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/07/06

Hi,
[#8160] Re: [PATCH] rdoc, C extensions, stop and start — "Austin Ziegler" <halostatue@...> 2006/07/06

On 7/6/06, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#8173] Re: [PATCH] rdoc, C extensions, stop and start — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/07/08

Hi,

[#8133] sync.rb memory corruption — ara.t.howard@...

2 messages 2006/07/05
[#8147] Re: [BUG] sync.rb memory corruption — nobu@... 2006/07/06

Hi,

[#8136] Confused exception handling in Continuation Context — "Robert Dober" <robert.dober@...>

Hi all

13 messages 2006/07/06
[#8137] Re: [Bug?] Confused exception handling in Continuation Context — nobu@... 2006/07/06

Hi,
[#8139] Re: [Bug?] Confused exception handling in Continuation Context — "Robert Dober" <robert.dober@...> 2006/07/06

On 7/6/06, nobu@ruby-lang.org <nobu@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#8138] Re: [Bug?] Confused exception handling in Continuation Context — Pit Capitain <pit@...> 2006/07/06

Robert Dober schrieb:
[#8140] Re: [Bug?] Confused exception handling in Continuation Context — "Robert Dober" <robert.dober@...> 2006/07/06

On 7/6/06, Pit Capitain <pit@capitain.de> wrote:
[#8148] Re: [Bug?] Confused exception handling in Continuation Context — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/07/06

Hi,
[#8155] Re: [Bug?] Confused exception handling in Continuation Context — "Robert Dober" <robert.dober@...> 2006/07/06

On 7/6/06, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#8156] Re: [Bug?] Confused exception handling in Continuation Context — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/07/06

Hi,
[#8157] Re: [Bug?] Confused exception handling in Continuation Context — "Robert Dober" <robert.dober@...> 2006/07/06

On 7/6/06, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#8159] Re: [Bug?] Confused exception handling in Continuation Context — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/07/06

Hi,
[#8150] Re: [Bug?] Confused exception handling in Continuation Context — Pit Capitain <pit@...> 2006/07/06

Robert Dober schrieb:
[#8154] Re: [Bug?] Confused exception handling in Continuation Context — "Robert Dober" <robert.dober@...> 2006/07/06

On 7/6/06, Pit Capitain <pit@capitain.de> wrote:
[#8163] Re: [Bug?] Confused exception handling in Continuation Context — Pit Capitain <pit@...> 2006/07/07

Robert Dober schrieb:

[#8141] Results of a build on Solaris9 — Hugh Sasse <hgs@...>

This is from the nightly snapshot, grabbed today, tested with the

2 messages 2006/07/06
[#8145] Re: Results of a build on Solaris9 — Hugh Sasse <hgs@...> 2006/07/06

I have managed to shrink the test results by clearing out unwanted

[#8142] thread/sync.rb memory corruption — ara.t.howard@...

7 messages 2006/07/06
[#8146] Re: [BUG] thread/sync.rb memory corruption — URABE Shyouhei <shyouhei@...> 2006/07/06

Could someone please confirm this can be reproduced on 1.8.5 pre1?
[#8149] Re: [BUG] thread/sync.rb memory corruption — Hugh Sasse <hgs@...> 2006/07/06

On Thu, 6 Jul 2006, URABE Shyouhei wrote:
[#8151] Re: [BUG] thread/sync.rb memory corruption — ara.t.howard@... 2006/07/06

On Fri, 7 Jul 2006, Hugh Sasse wrote:
[#8152] Re: [BUG] thread/sync.rb memory corruption — ara.t.howard@... 2006/07/06

On Fri, 7 Jul 2006 Ara.T.Howard@noaa.gov wrote:
[#8187] Re: [BUG] thread/sync.rb memory corruption — Hugh Sasse <hgs@...> 2006/07/10

How are these results? They seem to point to memory leaks in sync.rb
[#8153] Re: [BUG] thread/sync.rb memory corruption — Hugh Sasse <hgs@...> 2006/07/06

On Fri, 7 Jul 2006, ara.t.howard@noaa.gov wrote:

[#8161] --fqname option to test/unit/autorunner.rb — jonathan gold <dev@...>

Hello,

1 message 2006/07/06

[#8164] Solaris9 and nightly snapshot. — Hugh Sasse <hgs@...>

Attached are my test results for the nightly snapshot which seems to be

1 message 2006/07/07

[#8165] Re: [PATCH] --fqname option to test/unit/autorunner.rb — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...>

> -----Original Message-----

3 messages 2006/07/07
[#8189] Re: [PATCH] --fqname option to test/unit/autorunner.rb — jonathan gold <dev@...> 2006/07/10

Daniel --
[#8202] Re: [PATCH] --fqname option to test/unit/autorunner.rb — jonathan gold <dev@...> 2006/07/12

Daniel --

[#8166] Re: [PATCH] rdoc, C extensions, stop and start — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...>

2 messages 2006/07/07
[#8168] Re: [PATCH] rdoc, C extensions, stop and start — Hugh Sasse <hgs@...> 2006/07/07

On Fri, 7 Jul 2006, Berger, Daniel wrote:

[#8167] bug in printf — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #4970, was opened at 2006-07-07 14:18

9 messages 2006/07/07
[#8401] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-4970 ] bug in printf — nobu@... 2006/07/26

Hi,
[#8408] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-4970 ] bug in printf — "Jacob Fugal" <lukfugl@...> 2006/07/26

On 7/25/06, nobu@ruby-lang.org <nobu@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#8410] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-4970 ] bug in printf — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/07/26

Hi,
[#8411] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-4970 ] bug in printf — "Jacob Fugal" <lukfugl@...> 2006/07/26

On 7/26/06, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#8415] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-4970 ] bug in printf — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/07/26

Hi,
[#8418] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-4970 ] bug in printf — "Jacob Fugal" <lukfugl@...> 2006/07/27

On 7/26/06, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#8420] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-4970 ] bug in printf — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/07/28

Hi,
[#8404] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-4970 ] bug in printf — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/07/26

Hi,

[#8169] next in ensure body (Ruby 1.8.x) — "Dominik Bathon" <dbatml@...>

Hi,

5 messages 2006/07/07
[#8170] Re: [BUG] next in ensure body (Ruby 1.8.x) — ts <decoux@...> 2006/07/08

>>>>> "D" == Dominik Bathon <dbatml@gmx.de> writes:
[#8171] Re: [BUG] next in ensure body (Ruby 1.8.x) — "Dominik Bathon" <dbatml@...> 2006/07/08

On Sat, 08 Jul 2006 11:23:20 +0200, ts <decoux@moulon.inra.fr> wrote:
[#8172] Re: [BUG] next in ensure body (Ruby 1.8.x) — nobu@... 2006/07/08

Hi,
[#8174] Re: [BUG] next in ensure body (Ruby 1.8.x) — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/07/08

Hi,

[#8175] array.sort gives an error when the array contains a nil — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #4985, was opened at 2006-07-08 16:03

2 messages 2006/07/08
[#8176] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-4985 ] array.sort gives an error when the array contains a nil — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/07/08

Hi,

[#8177] Some rdoc for mkmf — Daniel Berger <djberg96@...>

Hi,

3 messages 2006/07/08
[#8179] Re: [PATCH] Some rdoc for mkmf — nobu@... 2006/07/09

Hi,
[#8183] Re: [PATCH] Some rdoc for mkmf — Daniel Berger <djberg96@...> 2006/07/09

--- nobu@ruby-lang.org wrote:

[#8178] merge to 1.8? — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>

I'd like permission to merge these changes to 1.8. I can't test the

2 messages 2006/07/08
[#8184] Re: merge to 1.8? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/07/09

Hi,

[#8180] Called method not removed after remove_method — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #4998, was opened at 2006-07-09 13:20

4 messages 2006/07/09
[#8181] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-4998 ] Called method not removed after remove_method — nobu@... 2006/07/09

Hi,
[#8182] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-4998 ] Called method not removed after remove_method — ts <decoux@...> 2006/07/09

>>>>> "n" == nobu <nobu@ruby-lang.org> writes:
[#8185] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-4998 ] Called method not removed after remove_method — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/07/09

Hi,

[#8188] Ruby/TK Iwidget combobox sub-classing — Lionel MAIAUX <lionel.maiaux@...>

Hello,

2 messages 2006/07/10
[#8190] Re: Ruby/TK Iwidget combobox sub-classing — Hidetoshi NAGAI <nagai@...> 2006/07/10

From: Lionel MAIAUX <lionel.maiaux@st.com>

[#8192] Installation kills <PATH> Environmental Variable — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #5016, was opened at 2006-07-10 22:11

1 message 2006/07/11

[#8194] rss patch -- mostly doc, plus English adjustments. — Hugh Sasse <hgs@...>

This is a patch set against the stable snapshot.

9 messages 2006/07/12
[#8195] Re: rss patch -- mostly doc, plus English adjustments. — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/07/12

Hi,
[#8204] Re: rss patch -- mostly doc, plus English adjustments. — Kouhei Sutou <kou@...> 2006/07/13

Hi,
[#8208] Re: rss patch -- mostly doc, plus English adjustments. — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2006/07/13

On Jul 13, 2006, at 4:38 AM, Kouhei Sutou wrote:
[#8220] Re: rss patch -- mostly doc, plus English adjustments. — Kouhei Sutou <kou@...> 2006/07/14

Hi,
[#8350] Re: rss patch -- mostly doc, plus English adjustments. — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2006/07/22

On Fri, 14 Jul 2006, Kouhei Sutou wrote:
[#8352] Re: rss patch -- mostly doc, plus English adjustments. — Kouhei Sutou <kou@...> 2006/07/22

Hi,
[#8218] Re: rss patch -- mostly doc, plus English adjustments. — Hugh Sasse <hgs@...> 2006/07/14

On Thu, 13 Jul 2006, Kouhei Sutou wrote:
[#8221] Re: rss patch -- mostly doc, plus English adjustments. — Kouhei Sutou <kou@...> 2006/07/14

Hi,

[#8196] SONY VIAOLAPTOP-------------$750USD,NOKIA N93-------------------$250USD — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #5032, was opened at 2006-07-12 18:41

5 messages 2006/07/12
[#8197] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-5032 ] SONY VIAOLAPTOP-------------$750USD,NOKIA N93-------------------$250USD — "Charles O Nutter" <headius@...> 2006/07/12

I think this is more of an enhancement...
[#8198] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-5032 ] SONY VIAOLAPTOP-------------$750USD,NOKIA N93-------------------$250USD — "Tom Copeland" <tom@...> 2006/07/12

> Subject: Re: [ ruby-Bugs-5032 ] SONY
[#8199] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-5032 ] SONY VIAOLAPTOP-------------$750USD,NOKIA N93-------------------$250USD — "Daniel Berger" <Daniel.Berger@...> 2006/07/12

Tom Copeland wrote:
[#8200] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-5032 ] SONY VIAOLAPTOP-------------$750USD,NOKIA N93-------------------$250USD — "Tom Copeland" <tom@...> 2006/07/12

>

[#8201] Please implement expect.rb for Windows Ruby — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #5036, was opened at 2006-07-12 14:44

7 messages 2006/07/12
[#8304] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-5036 ] Please implement expect.rb for Windows Ruby — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/07/20

Hi,
[#8305] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-5036 ] Please implement expect.rb for Windows Ruby — "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <znmeb@...> 2006/07/20

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#8307] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-5036 ] Please implement expect.rb for Windows Ruby — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/07/20

Hi,
[#8308] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-5036 ] Please implement expect.rb for Windows Ruby — Sam Roberts <sroberts@...> 2006/07/20

Quoting matz@ruby-lang.org, on Thu, Jul 20, 2006 at 02:05:26PM +0900:
[#8309] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-5036 ] Please implement expect.rb for Windows Ruby — "U.Nakamura" <usa@...> 2006/07/20

Hello,
[#8318] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-5036 ] Please implement expect.rb for Windows Ruby — "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <znmeb@...> 2006/07/20

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#8203] Re: [PATCH] --fqname option to test/unit/autorunner.rb — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...>

> -----Original Message-----

6 messages 2006/07/12
[#8206] Re: [PATCH] --fqname option to test/unit/autorunner.rb — jonathan gold <dev@...> 2006/07/13

Thanks again for getting back to me. Perhaps my original focus on the
[#8207] Re: [PATCH] --fqname option to test/unit/autorunner.rb — mathew <meta@...> 2006/07/13

Daniel Berger wrote:
[#8210] Re: [PATCH] --fqname option to test/unit/autorunner.rb — Sam Roberts <sroberts@...> 2006/07/13

On Fri, Jul 14, 2006 at 02:34:34AM +0900, jonathan gold wrote:
[#8213] Re: [PATCH] --fqname option to test/unit/autorunner.rb — "Daniel Berger" <Daniel.Berger@...> 2006/07/13

Sam Roberts wrote:
[#8215] Re: [PATCH] --fqname option to test/unit/autorunner.rb — jonathan gold <dev@...> 2006/07/13

Sam and Daniel --

[#8205] doc-patch for monitor. — Hugh Sasse <hgs@...>

A patch against:

1 message 2006/07/13

[#8209] Re: [PATCH] --fqname option to test/unit/autorunner.rb — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...>

> -----Original Message-----

1 message 2006/07/13

[#8211] Re: [PATCH] --fqname option to test/unit/autorunner.rb — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...>

1 message 2006/07/13

[#8219] Ruby problems calling VB COM using win32ole — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #5061, was opened at 2006-07-14 09:48

1 message 2006/07/14

[#8222] Rdoc patch for lib/prettyprint.rb — Hugh Sasse <hgs@...>

This is a first pass at converting the RDTool docs for lib/prettyprint.rb

5 messages 2006/07/14
[#8232] Re: Rdoc patch for lib/prettyprint.rb — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2006/07/15

In article <Pine.GSO.4.64.0607141504290.3480@brains.eng.cse.dmu.ac.uk>,
[#8237] Re: Rdoc patch for lib/prettyprint.rb — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/07/15

Hi,
[#8387] Re: Rdoc patch for lib/prettyprint.rb — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2006/07/25

On Jul 15, 2006, at 7:38 AM, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#8228] Re: Rdoc patch for lib/prettyprint.rb — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2006/07/14

[#8223] Unexpected pointer behavior with unpack — "Justin Bailey" <jgbailey@...>

I have had the opportunity to work [1] a lot with Ruby's ability to create

5 messages 2006/07/14
[#8225] Re: Unexpected pointer behavior with unpack — nobu@... 2006/07/14

Hi,
[#8226] Re: Unexpected pointer behavior with unpack — "Justin Bailey" <jgbailey@...> 2006/07/14

On 7/14/06, nobu@ruby-lang.org <nobu@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#8230] Re: Unexpected pointer behavior with unpack — nobu@... 2006/07/15

Hi,
[#8246] Re: Unexpected pointer behavior with unpack — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/07/18

Him

[#8224] Ruby 1.8.5 stable, Process::RLIM_SAVED_CUR issue — Daniel Berger <djberg96@...>

Hi,

3 messages 2006/07/14
[#8227] Re: Ruby 1.8.5 stable, Process::RLIM_SAVED_CUR issue — nobu@... 2006/07/14

Hi,
[#8231] Re: Ruby 1.8.5 stable, Process::RLIM_SAVED_CUR issue — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2006/07/15

In article <1152894017.3563.18.camel@imperator.site>,

[#8229] open-uri fails under multithreading — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #5067, was opened at 2006-07-14 19:11

5 messages 2006/07/15
[#8233] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-5067 ] open-uri fails under multithreading — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2006/07/15

In article <20060715001125.5FD0B5240E0A@rubyforge.org>,
[#8234] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-5067 ] open-uri fails under multithreading — nobu@... 2006/07/15

Hi,
[#8235] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-5067 ] open-uri fails under multithreading — nobu@... 2006/07/15

Hi,
[#8236] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-5067 ] open-uri fails under multithreading — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/07/15

Hi,

[#8238] Freeze in Regexp#match — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #5081, was opened at 2006-07-16 16:35

2 messages 2006/07/16
[#8239] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-5081 ] Freeze in Regexp#match — "Nikolai Weibull" <now@...> 2006/07/16

On 7/16/06, noreply@rubyforge.org <noreply@rubyforge.org> wrote:

[#8240] install ruby1.84 on solaris8 Error! — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #5087, was opened at 2006-07-17 08:48

3 messages 2006/07/17
[#8241] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-5087 ] install ruby1.84 on solaris8 Error! — nobu@... 2006/07/17

Hi,
[#8242] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-5087 ] install ruby1.84 on solaris8 Error! — Hugh Sasse <hgs@...> 2006/07/17

On Mon, 17 Jul 2006, nobu@ruby-lang.org wrote:

[#8243] tuplespace - make comments visible to rdoc. — Hugh Sasse <hgs@...>

comments in rdoc conventionally don't start with two # marks and don't

8 messages 2006/07/17
[#8244] Re: tuplespace - make comments visible to rdoc. — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2006/07/17

On Jul 17, 2006, at 10:09 AM, Hugh Sasse wrote:
[#8245] Re: tuplespace - make comments visible to rdoc. — "Jan Svitok" <jan.svitok@...> 2006/07/17

That 'doesn't add anything' is meant to the last paragraph, as i understood it.
[#8247] Re: tuplespace - make comments visible to rdoc. — Hugh Sasse <hgs@...> 2006/07/18

On Tue, 18 Jul 2006, Jan Svitok wrote:
[#8250] Re: tuplespace - make comments visible to rdoc. — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2006/07/18

On Jul 18, 2006, at 2:11 AM, Hugh Sasse wrote:
[#8254] Re: tuplespace - make comments visible to rdoc. — Hugh Sasse <hgs@...> 2006/07/18

On Wed, 19 Jul 2006, Eric Hodel wrote:
[#8256] Re: tuplespace - make comments visible to rdoc. — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2006/07/18

On Jul 18, 2006, at 10:35 AM, Hugh Sasse wrote:
[#8277] Re: tuplespace - make comments visible to rdoc. — Hugh Sasse <hgs@...> 2006/07/19

On Wed, 19 Jul 2006, Eric Hodel wrote:

[#8248] One-Click Installer: MinGW? or VC2005? — "Curt Hibbs" <ml.chibbs@...>

I just posted this to ruby-talk. But I would also like to discuss this

33 messages 2006/07/18
[#8249] Re: One-Click Installer: MinGW? or VC2005? — "Francis Cianfrocca" <garbagecat10@...> 2006/07/18

On 7/18/06, Curt Hibbs <ml.chibbs@gmail.com> wrote:
[#8251] Re: One-Click Installer: MinGW? or VC2005? — "U.Nakamura" <usa@...> 2006/07/18

Hello,
[#8265] Re: One-Click Installer: MinGW? or VC2005? — "Bill Kelly" <billk@...> 2006/07/19

[#8312] Re: One-Click Installer: MinGW? or VC2005? — Kaspar Schiess <eule@...> 2006/07/20

Dear Curt,
[#8316] Re: One-Click Installer: MinGW? or VC2005? — "Curt Hibbs" <ml.chibbs@...> 2006/07/20

On 7/20/06, Kaspar Schiess <eule@space.ch> wrote:
[#8324] Re: One-Click Installer: MinGW? or VC2005? — "Tim Morgan" <tmorgan99@...> 2006/07/20

I was wondering if the toolchain could be built around rake?
[#8325] Re: One-Click Installer: MinGW? or VC2005? — "Curt Hibbs" <ml.chibbs@...> 2006/07/20

The One-Click Ruby Installer's build process is, in fact, controlled via
[#8326] Re: One-Click Installer: MinGW? or VC2005? — "Tim Morgan" <tmorgan99@...> 2006/07/20

I was rather hoping the Rake's reach could extend to the be a compelling
[#8328] Re: One-Click Installer: MinGW? or VC2005? — "Curt Hibbs" <ml.chibbs@...> 2006/07/20

Extension authors are free to use Rake if they choose.
[#8264] Re: One-Click Installer: MinGW? or VC2005? — Charlie Savage <cfis@...> 2006/07/19

From my experience using both tool chains on Windows (for the ruby-prof
[#8266] Re: One-Click Installer: MinGW? or VC2005? — "Curt Hibbs" <ml.chibbs@...> 2006/07/19

Tim, I'm going to top reply since your post was so long. I'm interested in
[#8267] Re: One-Click Installer: MinGW? or VC2005? — Charlie Savage <cfis@...> 2006/07/19

> Tim, I'm going to top reply since your post was so long. I'm interested in
[#8269] Re: One-Click Installer: MinGW? or VC2005? — nobu@... 2006/07/19

Hi,
[#8270] Re: One-Click Installer: MinGW? or VC2005? — Charlie Savage <cfis@...> 2006/07/19

> And you have to count external DLLs - Iconv, SSLeay, PDcurses,
[#8276] Re: One-Click Installer: MinGW? or VC2005? — "Curt Hibbs" <ml.chibbs@...> 2006/07/19

On 7/19/06, Charlie Savage <cfis@savagexi.com> wrote:
[#8278] Re: One-Click Installer: MinGW? or VC2005? — "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <znmeb@...> 2006/07/19

Curt Hibbs wrote:
[#8280] Re: One-Click Installer: MinGW? or VC2005? — "Curt Hibbs" <ml.chibbs@...> 2006/07/19

On 7/19/06, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky <znmeb@cesmail.net> wrote:
[#8302] Re: One-Click Installer: MinGW? or VC2005? — "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <znmeb@...> 2006/07/20

Curt Hibbs wrote:
[#8306] Re: One-Click Installer: MinGW? or VC2005? — "Curt Hibbs" <ml.chibbs@...> 2006/07/20

On 7/19/06, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky <znmeb@cesmail.net> wrote:
[#8338] Re: One-Click Installer: MinGW? or VC2005? — "Austin Ziegler" <halostatue@...> 2006/07/21

On 7/19/06, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky <znmeb@cesmail.net> wrote:
[#8347] Re: One-Click Installer: MinGW? or VC2005? — Tom Copeland <tom@...> 2006/07/21

On Sat, 2006-07-22 at 00:39 +0900, Austin Ziegler wrote:
[#8348] Re: One-Click Installer: MinGW? or VC2005? — "Austin Ziegler" <halostatue@...> 2006/07/21

On 7/21/06, Tom Copeland <tom@infoether.com> wrote:
[#8349] Re: One-Click Installer: MinGW? or VC2005? — Tom Copeland <tom@...> 2006/07/22

On Sat, 2006-07-22 at 08:11 +0900, Austin Ziegler wrote:
[#8335] Re: One-Click Installer: MinGW? or VC2005? — ara.t.howard@... 2006/07/21

On Wed, 19 Jul 2006, Charlie Savage wrote:
[#8253] Re: One-Click Installer: MinGW? or VC2005? — "U.Nakamura" <usa@...> 2006/07/18

Hello,
[#8255] Re: One-Click Installer: MinGW? or VC2005? — "Curt Hibbs" <ml.chibbs@...> 2006/07/18

On 7/18/06, U.Nakamura <usa@garbagecollect.jp> wrote:
[#8334] Re: One-Click Installer: MinGW? or VC2005? — ara.t.howard@... 2006/07/21

On Wed, 19 Jul 2006, Curt Hibbs wrote:
[#8336] Re: One-Click Installer: MinGW? or VC2005? — "Austin Ziegler" <halostatue@...> 2006/07/21

On 7/18/06, U.Nakamura <usa@garbagecollect.jp> wrote:
[#8337] Re: One-Click Installer: MinGW? or VC2005? — ara.t.howard@... 2006/07/21

On Sat, 22 Jul 2006, Austin Ziegler wrote:
[#8362] Re: One-Click Installer: MinGW? or VC2005? — nobu@... 2006/07/23

Hi,
[#8365] Re: One-Click Installer: MinGW? or VC2005? — ara.t.howard@... 2006/07/23

On Sun, 23 Jul 2006 nobu@ruby-lang.org wrote:
[#8339] Re: One-Click Installer: MinGW? or VC2005? — "U.Nakamura" <usa@...> 2006/07/21

Hello,

[#8252] Another look at RSS... — Hugh Sasse <hgs@...>

I've had another look at lib/rss and the patch below is mostly doc

3 messages 2006/07/18
[#8281] Re: Another look at RSS... — Kouhei Sutou <kou@...> 2006/07/19

Hi,
[#8284] Re: Another look at RSS... — Hugh Sasse <hgs@...> 2006/07/19

On Thu, 20 Jul 2006, Kouhei Sutou wrote:

[#8262] Instability around popen due to missing rb_thread_atfork — <noreply@...>

Patches item #5111, was opened at 2006-07-18 22:36

7 messages 2006/07/18
[#8268] Re: [ ruby-Patches-5111 ] Instability around popen due to missing rb_thread_atfork — nobu@... 2006/07/19

Hi,
[#8370] Re: [ ruby-Patches-5111 ] Instability around popen due to missing rb_thread_atfork — Jonathan Paisley <jp-www@...> 2006/07/23

On 19 Jul 2006, at 8:25, <nobu@ruby-lang.org> <nobu@ruby-lang.org>
[#8400] Re: [ ruby-Patches-5111 ] Instability around popen due to missing rb_thread_atfork — nobu@... 2006/07/26

Hi,
[#12004] Re: [ ruby-Patches-5111 ] Instability around popen due to missing rb_thread_atfork — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...> 2007/08/27

Hi nobu,
[#12006] Re: [ ruby-Patches-5111 ] Instability around popen due to missing rb_thread_atfork — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2007/08/27

Hi,
[#8414] Re: [ ruby-Patches-5111 ] Instability around popen due to missing rb_thread_atfork — Jonathan Paisley <jp-www@...> 2006/07/26

On 26 Jul 2006, at 2:13, <nobu@ruby-lang.org> wrote:

[#8271] my sandboxing extension!! — why the lucky stiff <ruby-core@...>

I have (what feels like) very exciting news. I finally sat down to code up my

17 messages 2006/07/19
[#8272] Re: [YAY] my sandboxing extension!! — Mauricio Fernandez <mfp@...> 2006/07/19

On Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 06:40:34PM +0900, why the lucky stiff wrote:
[#8279] Re: [YAY] my sandboxing extension!! — why the lucky stiff <ruby-core@...> 2006/07/19

On Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 08:00:15PM +0900, Mauricio Fernandez wrote:
[#8322] Re: [YAY] my sandboxing extension!! — Mauricio Fernandez <mfp@...> 2006/07/20

On Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 11:18:27PM +0900, why the lucky stiff wrote:
[#8343] Re: [YAY] my sandboxing extension!! — "Charles O Nutter" <headius@...> 2006/07/21

Jumping in from a JRuby perspective:
[#8345] Re: [YAY] my sandboxing extension!! — why the lucky stiff <ruby-core@...> 2006/07/21

On Sat, Jul 22, 2006 at 02:50:24AM +0900, Charles O Nutter wrote:
[#8346] Re: [YAY] my sandboxing extension!! — "Charles O Nutter" <headius@...> 2006/07/21

On 7/21/06, why the lucky stiff <ruby-core@whytheluckystiff.net> wrote:
[#8283] Re: [YAY] my sandboxing extension!! — why the lucky stiff <ruby-core@...> 2006/07/19

Okay, it turns out that, in order for this to work, I also need the following
[#8310] Re: [YAY] my sandboxing extension!! — why the lucky stiff <ruby-core@...> 2006/07/20

On Thu, Jul 20, 2006 at 12:26:29AM +0900, why the lucky stiff wrote:
[#8311] Re: [YAY] my sandboxing extension!! — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/07/20

Hi,
[#8313] Re: [YAY] my sandboxing extension!! — why the lucky stiff <ruby-core@...> 2006/07/20

On Thu, Jul 20, 2006 at 03:11:34PM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#8314] Re: [YAY] my sandboxing extension!! — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/07/20

Hi,
[#8315] Re: [YAY] my sandboxing extension!! — "Nikolai Weibull" <now@...> 2006/07/20

On 7/20/06, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#8366] Re: [YAY] my sandboxing extension!! — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2006/07/23

On Thu, 20 Jul 2006, Nikolai Weibull wrote:
[#8369] Re: [YAY] my sandboxing extension!! — "Nikolai Weibull" <now@...> 2006/07/23

On 7/23/06, Mathieu Bouchard <matju@artengine.ca> wrote:
[#8371] Re: [YAY] my sandboxing extension!! — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2006/07/23

On Mon, 24 Jul 2006, Nikolai Weibull wrote:
[#8372] Re: [YAY] my sandboxing extension!! — "Nikolai Weibull" <now@...> 2006/07/23

On 7/23/06, Mathieu Bouchard <matju@artengine.ca> wrote:

[#8273] Regular-Expressions Problem/Bug — Reto Schuettel <reto-ruby-core@...>

Hi

11 messages 2006/07/19
[#8275] Re: Regular-Expressions Problem/Bug — Hugh Sasse <hgs@...> 2006/07/19

On Wed, 19 Jul 2006, Reto Schuettel wrote:
[#8286] Re: Regular-Expressions Problem/Bug — Reto Schuettel <reto-ruby-core@...> 2006/07/19

Hi
[#8287] Re: Regular-Expressions Problem/Bug — ts <decoux@...> 2006/07/19

>>>>> "R" == Reto Schuettel <reto-ruby-core@schuettel.ch> writes:
[#8288] Re: Regular-Expressions Problem/Bug — Hugh Sasse <hgs@...> 2006/07/19

On Thu, 20 Jul 2006, ts wrote:
[#8289] Re: Regular-Expressions Problem/Bug — Reto Schuettel <reto-ruby-core@...> 2006/07/19

Hi
[#8293] Re: Regular-Expressions Problem/Bug — ts <decoux@...> 2006/07/19

>>>>> "R" == Reto Schuettel <reto-ruby-core@schuettel.ch> writes:
[#8354] Re: Regular-Expressions Problem/Bug — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2006/07/22

On Thu, 20 Jul 2006, Reto Schuettel wrote:
[#8665] Re: Regular-Expressions Problem/Bug — Reto Schuettel <reto-ruby-core@...> 2006/08/20

Hi Mathieu
[#8274] Re: Regular-Expressions Problem/Bug — "Jan Svitok" <jan.svitok@...> 2006/07/19

Python handles this immediately, even if I added two orders to the length.
[#8353] Re: Regular-Expressions Problem/Bug — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2006/07/22

On Wed, 19 Jul 2006, Reto Schuettel wrote:

[#8282] PTY on Solaris multi-processor systems — Reto Schuettel <reto-ruby-core@...>

Hi

4 messages 2006/07/19
[#8291] Re: PTY on Solaris multi-processor systems — Hugh Sasse <hgs@...> 2006/07/19

On Thu, 20 Jul 2006, Reto Schuettel wrote:
[#8301] Re: PTY on Solaris multi-processor systems — nobu@... 2006/07/20

Hi,
[#8405] Re: PTY on Solaris multi-processor systems — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/07/26

Hi,

[#8290] Patch to Ruby in 2005 — "John Fletcher" <J.P.Fletcher@...>

According to the ChangeLog in Ruby 1.8.4 the

5 messages 2006/07/19
[#8321] Re: Patch to Ruby in 2005 — nobu@... 2006/07/20

Hi,
[#8375] Re: Patch to Ruby in 2005 — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/07/24

Hi,
[#8376] Re: Patch to Ruby in 2005 — nobu@... 2006/07/24

Hi,
[#8377] Re: Patch to Ruby in 2005 — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/07/24

Hi,

[#8294] MySQL-Front is now not available — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #5134, was opened at 2006-07-19 16:45

2 messages 2006/07/19
[#8303] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-5134 ] MySQL-Front is now not available — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/07/20

Hi,

[#8299] Interest in NTLM/Negotiate patch for net/http? — "Justin Bailey" <jgbailey@...>

My workplace recently installed Microsoft's ISA server, which proxies all

4 messages 2006/07/20
[#8300] Re: Interest in NTLM/Negotiate patch for net/http? — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2006/07/20

On Jul 19, 2006, at 5:01 PM, Justin Bailey wrote:
[#8323] Re: Interest in NTLM/Negotiate patch for net/http? — "Justin Bailey" <jgbailey@...> 2006/07/20

On 7/19/06, Eric Hodel <drbrain@segment7.net> wrote:
[#8386] Re: Interest in NTLM/Negotiate patch for net/http? — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2006/07/25

On Jul 20, 2006, at 1:07 PM, Justin Bailey wrote:

[#8317] rdoc chokes on Stable Snapshot. — Hugh Sasse <hgs@...>

1 message 2006/07/20

[#8319] Interest in NTLM/Negotiate patch for net/http? — "Justin Bailey" <jgbailey@...>

My workplace recently installed Microsoft's ISA server, which proxies all

2 messages 2006/07/20
[#8320] Re: Interest in NTLM/Negotiate patch for net/http? — Aredridel <aredridel@...> 2006/07/20

> I'm wondering if there is interest from the core team on a patch which

[#8327] - Win32 NTLM/Negotiate Authentication Support for Net::HTTP — "Justin Bailey" <jgbailey@...>

These two files represent a patch which allows Net::HTTP to authenticate

1 message 2006/07/20

[#8329] Trace API bug — "Kent Sibilev" <ksruby@...>

Hi Everyone,

4 messages 2006/07/21
[#8330] Re: Trace API bug — "Kent Sibilev" <ksruby@...> 2006/07/21

Does this patch make any sense?
[#8439] Re: Trace API bug — "Kent Sibilev" <ksruby@...> 2006/07/29

Anyone?
[#8440] Re: Trace API bug — nobu@... 2006/07/30

Hi,

[#8331] (Fwd) Re: Patch to Ruby in 2005 — "John Fletcher" <J.P.Fletcher@...>

Hi

8 messages 2006/07/21
[#8332] Re: (Fwd) Re: Patch to Ruby in 2005 — nobu@... 2006/07/21

Hi,
[#8351] Patch to Ruby in 2003 — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2006/07/22

On Fri, 21 Jul 2006, nobu@ruby-lang.org wrote:
[#8357] Re: Patch to Ruby in 2003 — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/07/22

Hi,
[#8358] Re: Patch to Ruby in 2003 — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2006/07/22

On Sun, 23 Jul 2006, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#8361] Re: Patch to Ruby in 2003 — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2006/07/23

In article <Pine.LNX.4.64.0607221126100.30944@localhost.localdomain>,
[#8359] Re: Patch to Ruby in 2003 — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/07/22

Hi,
[#9062] Re: Patch to Ruby in 2003 — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2006/10/09

On Sun, 23 Jul 2006, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#8333] Re: One-Click Installer: MinGW? or VC2005? — "Austin Ziegler" <halostatue@...>

On 7/18/06, Curt Hibbs <ml.chibbs@gmail.com> wrote:

1 message 2006/07/21

[#8340] Bug in Date.parse or OCI8 ? — "Daniel Berger" <Daniel.Berger@...>

Hi all,

2 messages 2006/07/21
[#8341] Re: Bug in Date.parse or OCI8 ? — "Daniel Berger" <Daniel.Berger@...> 2006/07/21

Daniel Berger wrote:

[#8342] sandbox r28 + rb_get_method_body? — why the lucky stiff <ruby-core@...>

For interested persons who are running the very latest ruby_1_8 branch, here are

3 messages 2006/07/21
[#8398] Re: sandbox r28 + rb_get_method_body? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/07/25

Hi,
[#8409] Re: sandbox r28 + rb_get_method_body? — why the lucky stiff <ruby-core@...> 2006/07/26

On Wed, Jul 26, 2006 at 08:45:55AM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#8344] Re: Replacing ' with \' using gsub — "Jan Svitok" <jan.svitok@...>

On 7/21/06, ts <decoux@moulon.inra.fr> wrote:

1 message 2006/07/21

[#8356] Process.getrlimit, setrlimit, and a request — Daniel Berger <djberg96@...>

Hi,

1 message 2006/07/22

[#8360] NOKIA N93-------------------$250USD,NOKIA 3250-------------------$230USD — tyler little <devlists-ruby-core@...>

1 message 2006/07/22

[#8363] crash when loading shared objects with irb -rreadline — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net>

$ irb -rreadline

2 messages 2006/07/23
[#8364] Re: crash when loading shared objects with irb -rreadline — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2006/07/23

On Jul 23, 2006, at 12:49 AM, Eric Hodel wrote:

[#8367] "make clean" doesn't work — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...>

2 messages 2006/07/23
[#8368] Re: "make clean" doesn't work — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2006/07/23

On Mon, 24 Jul 2006, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:

[#8373] Re: One-Click Installer: MinGW? or VC2005? — "Curt Hibbs" <ml.chibbs@...>

I would like to thank everyone who posted to this thread. You have really

1 message 2006/07/24

[#8374] RUBY 1.8 CVS HEAD: make test-all failures — ville.mattila@...

1 message 2006/07/24

[#8378] .document patches. — Hugh Sasse <hgs@...>

These are to include more things in what gets docuemnted.

1 message 2006/07/24

[#8379] rdoc grows to large size. — Hugh Sasse <hgs@...>

While working on that .document patch I noticed that rdoc grew to

10 messages 2006/07/24
[#8380] Re: rdoc grows to large size. — "Charles O Nutter" <headius@...> 2006/07/24

We have noticed this with JRuby as well; generating RDoc for gems take a
[#8381] Re: rdoc grows to large size. — Marcus Rueckert <mrueckert@...> 2006/07/24

On 2006-07-24 22:09:00 +0900, Hugh Sasse wrote:
[#8385] Re: rdoc grows to large size. — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2006/07/25

On Jul 24, 2006, at 6:09 AM, Hugh Sasse wrote:
[#8388] Re: rdoc grows to large size. — Hugh Sasse <hgs@...> 2006/07/25

On Tue, 25 Jul 2006, Eric Hodel wrote:
[#8389] Re: rdoc grows to large size. — "Charles O Nutter" <headius@...> 2006/07/25

I've studied the rdoc code a bit (only so much as to maintain my sanity) and
[#8390] Re: rdoc grows to large size. — Hugh Sasse <hgs@...> 2006/07/25

On Tue, 25 Jul 2006, Charles O Nutter wrote:
[#8393] Re: rdoc grows to large size. — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2006/07/25

On Jul 25, 2006, at 3:21 AM, Hugh Sasse wrote:
[#8395] Re: rdoc grows to large size. — "Charles O Nutter" <headius@...> 2006/07/25

On 7/25/06, Eric Hodel <drbrain@segment7.net> wrote:
[#8391] Re: rdoc grows to large size. — "Nikolai Weibull" <now@...> 2006/07/25

On 7/25/06, Charles O Nutter <headius@headius.com> wrote:

[#8382] :'foo-bar' causing warnings in rdoc parser — Florian Frank <flori@...>

Hi Thomas,

1 message 2006/07/24

[#8383] Win32 NTLM/Negotiate Authentication Support for Net::HTTP — <noreply@...>

Patches item #5177, was opened at 2006-07-24 08:28

1 message 2006/07/24

[#8392] ri patch for html format — "Kent Sibilev" <ksruby@...>

ri doesn't escape <,>, &, etc. characters when used with html formatter like

3 messages 2006/07/25
[#8679] Re: ri patch for html format — "Kent Sibilev" <ksruby@...> 2006/08/22

Anyone?
[#8730] Re: ri patch for html format — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2006/08/27

On Aug 22, 2006, at 7:01 AM, Kent Sibilev wrote:

[#8394] Re: rdoc grows to large size. — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...>

> -----Original Message-----

6 messages 2006/07/25
[#8403] Re: rdoc grows to large size. — Dave Howell <groups+2006@...> 2006/07/26

[#8406] Re: rdoc grows to large size. — Daniel Berger <djberg96@...> 2006/07/26

Dave Howell wrote:
[#8416] Re: rdoc grows to large size. — "Charles O Nutter" <headius@...> 2006/07/27

Rockit sounds like a pretty good option, but it requires C code that would
[#8396] Re: rdoc grows to large size. — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2006/07/25

On Wed, 26 Jul 2006, Berger, Daniel wrote:
[#8399] Re: rdoc grows to large size. — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2006/07/26

On Jul 25, 2006, at 9:56 AM, Berger, Daniel wrote:

[#8397] Re: rdoc grows to large size. — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...>

> -----Original Message-----

1 message 2006/07/25

[#8412] .document patch — Hugh Sasse <hgs@...>

The intent of the patch below is to improve the coverage of the rdoc

1 message 2006/07/26

[#8413] date.rb: DateTime.sec_fraction and day_fraction_to_time return incorrect second fraction — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #5203, was opened at 2006-07-26 14:15

2 messages 2006/07/26
[#8417] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-5203 ] date.rb: DateTime.sec_fraction and day_fraction_to_time return incorrect second fraction — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/07/27

Hi,

[#8419] irb: assignment to $stdout — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #5217, was opened at 2006-07-27 16:12

2 messages 2006/07/27
[#8421] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-5217 ] irb: assignment to $stdout — nobu@... 2006/07/28

Hi,

[#8422] Logger -- documentation patch — Hugh Sasse <hgs@...>

A patch against

1 message 2006/07/28

[#8423] doc patch: readbytes.rb — Hugh Sasse <hgs@...>

A patch against the stable snapshot.

5 messages 2006/07/28
[#8424] Re: doc patch: readbytes.rb — "Daniel Berger" <Daniel.Berger@...> 2006/07/28

Hugh Sasse wrote:
[#8426] Re: doc patch: readbytes.rb — Hugh Sasse <hgs@...> 2006/07/28

On Sat, 29 Jul 2006, Daniel Berger wrote:
[#8431] Re: doc patch: readbytes.rb — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2006/07/28

On Jul 28, 2006, at 10:27 AM, Hugh Sasse wrote:
[#8462] Re: doc patch: readbytes.rb — Hugh Sasse <hgs@...> 2006/07/31

On Sat, 29 Jul 2006, Eric Hodel wrote:

[#8425] Re: doc patch: readbytes.rb — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...>

> -----Original Message-----

1 message 2006/07/28

[#8427] RDoc picking up comments from function prototypes — Tilman Sauerbeck <tilman@...>

Hi,

8 messages 2006/07/28
[#8574] Re: RDoc picking up comments from function prototypes — Tilman Sauerbeck <tilman@...> 2006/08/09

Tilman Sauerbeck [2006-07-29 02:39]:
[#8601] Re: RDoc picking up comments from function prototypes — "Tanaka Akira" <akr@...> 2006/08/12

On 8/10/06, Tilman Sauerbeck <tilman@code-monkey.de> wrote:
[#8602] Re: RDoc picking up comments from function prototypes — Tilman Sauerbeck <tilman@...> 2006/08/12

Tanaka Akira [2006-08-12 14:26]:
[#8576] Re: RDoc picking up comments from function prototypes — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2006/08/09

On Aug 9, 2006, at 9:52 AM, Tilman Sauerbeck wrote:
[#8577] 1.8.5 final update candidates (was Re: RDoc picking up comments from function prototypes) — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/08/10

Hi,
[#8579] Re: 1.8.5 final update candidates (was Re: RDoc picking up comments from function prototypes) — Steven Jenkins <steven.jenkins@...> 2006/08/10

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#8586] Re: RDoc picking up comments from function prototypes — Tilman Sauerbeck <tilman@...> 2006/08/10

Eric Hodel [2006-08-10 02:24]:

[#8428] doc patch: weakref. — Hugh Sasse <hgs@...>

Here is a doc patch for weakref, against the stable snapshot as before.

2 messages 2006/07/28
[#8429] Re: doc patch: weakref. — Pit Capitain <pit@...> 2006/07/28

Hugh Sasse schrieb:

[#8430] Re: doc patch: weakref. — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...>

> -----Original Message-----

19 messages 2006/07/28
[#8434] Re: doc patch: weakref. — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/07/29

Hi,
[#8436] Re: doc patch: weakref. — Daniel Berger <djberg96@...> 2006/07/29

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#8438] Re: doc patch: weakref. — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/07/29

Hi,
[#8437] Re: doc patch: weakref. — Mauricio Fernandez <mfp@...> 2006/07/29

On Sat, Jul 29, 2006 at 07:37:24PM +0900, Daniel Berger wrote:
[#8463] Re: doc patch: weakref. — Hugh Sasse <hgs@...> 2006/07/31

On Sun, 30 Jul 2006, Mauricio Fernandez wrote:
[#8467] Re: doc patch: weakref. — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2006/07/31

On Jul 31, 2006, at 3:20 AM, Hugh Sasse wrote:
[#8470] Re: doc patch: weakref. — Hugh Sasse <hgs@...> 2006/08/01

On Tue, 1 Aug 2006, Eric Hodel wrote:
[#8481] Re: doc patch: weakref. — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2006/08/01

On Aug 1, 2006, at 2:13 AM, Hugh Sasse wrote:
[#8487] Re: doc patch: weakref. — Hugh Sasse <hgs@...> 2006/08/02

On Wed, 2 Aug 2006, Eric Hodel wrote:
[#8488] Re: doc patch: weakref. — mathew <meta@...> 2006/08/02

Hugh Sasse wrote:
[#8490] Re: doc patch: weakref. — Hugh Sasse <hgs@...> 2006/08/02

On Thu, 3 Aug 2006, mathew wrote:
[#8491] Re: doc patch: weakref. — mathew <meta@...> 2006/08/02

Hugh Sasse wrote:
[#8492] Re: doc patch: weakref. — Hugh Sasse <hgs@...> 2006/08/02

On Thu, 3 Aug 2006, mathew wrote:
[#8519] Re: doc patch: weakref. — mathew <meta@...> 2006/08/03

Hugh Sasse wrote:
[#8495] Re: doc patch: weakref. — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2006/08/02

On Aug 2, 2006, at 2:53 AM, Hugh Sasse wrote:
[#8500] Re: doc patch: weakref. — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/08/03

Hi,
[#8493] Re: doc patch: weakref.rb - against HEAD — Hugh Sasse <hgs@...> 2006/08/02

[#8451] Re: doc patch: weakref. — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2006/07/30

On Sun, 30 Jul 2006, Mauricio Fernandez wrote:

[#8432] Problem with ruby 1.9 — "Vincent Isambart" <vincent.isambart@...>

Hello,

3 messages 2006/07/29
[#8433] Re: Problem with ruby 1.9 — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2006/07/29

In article <7d9a1f530607290135y2901da9cxd18c7227c79f0553@mail.gmail.com>,
[#8435] Re: Problem with ruby 1.9 — "Vincent Isambart" <vincent.isambart@...> 2006/07/29

Hi,

[#8441] Inconsistency in scoping during module_eval? — "Charles O Nutter" <headius@...>

I have the following code:

18 messages 2006/07/30
[#8442] Re: Inconsistency in scoping during module_eval? — nobu@... 2006/07/30

Hi,
[#8443] Re: Inconsistency in scoping during module_eval? — "Charles O Nutter" <headius@...> 2006/07/30

Why does this:
[#8444] Re: Inconsistency in scoping during module_eval? — nobu@... 2006/07/30

Hi,
[#8445] Re: Inconsistency in scoping during module_eval? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/07/30

Hi,
[#8446] Re: Inconsistency in scoping during module_eval? — "Matt Todd" <chiology@...> 2006/07/30

Does it matter that you're using module_eval inside of a class definition?
[#8450] Re: Inconsistency in scoping during module_eval? — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2006/07/30

On Sun, 30 Jul 2006, Matt Todd wrote:
[#8454] Re: Inconsistency in scoping during module_eval? — "Charles O Nutter" <headius@...> 2006/07/31

So to clarify...
[#8455] Re: Inconsistency in scoping during module_eval? — "Matt Todd" <chiology@...> 2006/07/31

I don't want to take this thread off-course, but what I meant was
[#8458] Re: Inconsistency in scoping during module_eval? — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2006/07/31

On Mon, 31 Jul 2006, Matt Todd wrote:
[#8459] Re: Inconsistency in scoping during module_eval? — "Charles O Nutter" <headius@...> 2006/07/31

On 7/30/06, Mathieu Bouchard <matju@artengine.ca> wrote:
[#8460] Re: Inconsistency in scoping during module_eval? — "Matt Todd" <chiology@...> 2006/07/31

Awesome. Thank you very much for your responses. Curious. I knew a
[#8461] Re: Inconsistency in scoping during module_eval? — "Jan Svitok" <jan.svitok@...> 2006/07/31

On 7/31/06, Matt Todd <chiology@gmail.com> wrote:
[#8468] Re: Inconsistency in scoping during module_eval? — "Matt Todd" <chiology@...> 2006/08/01

Yes, absolutely. However, if everything is an object (including a
[#8469] Re: Inconsistency in scoping during module_eval? — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2006/08/01

On Tue, 1 Aug 2006, Matt Todd wrote:
[#8471] Re: Inconsistency in scoping during module_eval? — dblack@... 2006/08/01

Hi --
[#8472] Re: Inconsistency in scoping during module_eval? — "Matt Todd" <chiology@...> 2006/08/01

I think I'll just take an afternoon (or 20) and experiment until I
[#8456] Re: Inconsistency in scoping during module_eval? — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2006/07/31

On Mon, 31 Jul 2006, Charles O Nutter wrote:

[#8447] #if should be #ifdef in ruby.h — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #5243, was opened at 2006-07-30 16:31

6 messages 2006/07/30
[#8448] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-5243 ] #if should be #ifdef in ruby.h — URABE Shyouhei <shyouhei@...> 2006/07/30

noreply@rubyforge.org wrote:
[#8449] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-5243 ] #if should be #ifdef in ruby.h — "Nikolai Weibull" <now@...> 2006/07/30

On 7/31/06, URABE Shyouhei <shyouhei@ice.uec.ac.jp> wrote:
[#8452] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-5243 ] #if should be #ifdef in ruby.h — URABE Shyouhei <shyouhei@...> 2006/07/30

Hi,
[#8464] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-5243 ] #if should be #ifdef in ruby.h — "Nikolai Weibull" <now@...> 2006/07/31

On 7/31/06, URABE Shyouhei <shyouhei@ice.uec.ac.jp> wrote:
[#8465] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-5243 ] #if should be #ifdef in ruby.h — URABE Shyouhei <shyouhei@...> 2006/07/31

Hi,

[#8453] RingServer fails to find a TupleSpace when TupleSpace resides in the same ruby process with RingServer — <noreply@...>

Patches item #5244, was opened at 2006-07-31 00:17

1 message 2006/07/31

[#8457] bypassing method lookup/call overhead — "Eric Mahurin" <eric.mahurin@...>

From performance testing that I've looked at with a C extension, it

1 message 2006/07/31

[#8466] Multi-Line Date Formate Patch — James Edward Gray II <james@...>

It was pointed out to me that the following code is surprising:

10 messages 2006/07/31
[#8474] Re: Multi-Line Date Formate Patch — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2006/08/01

On Jul 31, 2006, at 8:26 AM, James Edward Gray II wrote:
[#8475] Re: Multi-Line Date Formate Patch — nobu@... 2006/08/01

Hi,
[#8476] Re: Multi-Line Date Formate Patch — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2006/08/01

On Aug 1, 2006, at 9:50 AM, nobu@ruby-lang.org wrote:
[#8508] Re: Multi-Line Date Formate Patch — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2006/08/03

On Aug 1, 2006, at 10:12 AM, James Edward Gray II wrote:
[#8509] Re: Multi-Line Date Formate Patch — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/08/03

Hi,
[#8510] Re: Multi-Line Date Formate Patch — nobu@... 2006/08/03

Hi,
[#8511] Re: Multi-Line Date Formate Patch — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2006/08/03

On Aug 3, 2006, at 11:26 AM, nobu@ruby-lang.org wrote:
[#8482] Re: Multi-Line Date Formate Patch — nobu@... 2006/08/02

Hi,
[#8483] Re: Multi-Line Date Formate Patch — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2006/08/02

On Aug 1, 2006, at 9:12 PM, nobu@ruby-lang.org wrote:

Re: [BUG] thread/sync.rb memory corruption

From: Hugh Sasse <hgs@...>
Date: 2006-07-10 12:57:48 UTC
List: ruby-core #8187 
How are these results?   They seem to point to memory leaks in sync.rb

        Hugh

Attachments (2)

typescript (6.23 KB, text/plain) 
Script started on Mon Jul 10 13:44:09 2006
brains hgs 11 %> ./syncbug.rb 


ruby 1.8.5 (2006-07-04) [sparc-solaris2.9]

c-return (eval):2  singleton_method_added   Kernel

c-return (eval):5  singleton_method_added   Kernel

c-return (eval):6  singleton_method_added   Kernel

  return /apps/hgs/RUBY-STABLE-SNAPSHOT-BRAINS/lib/ruby/1.8/sync.rb:88 define_aliases   Sync_m

c-return ./syncbug.rb:151        new    Class

c-return /apps/hgs/RUBY-STABLE-SNAPSHOT-BRAINS/lib/ruby/1.8/sync.rb:261        ===   Symbol

c-return /apps/hgs/RUBY-STABLE-SNAPSHOT-BRAINS/lib/ruby/1.8/sync.rb:280        ===   Symbol

c-return /apps/hgs/RUBY-STABLE-SNAPSHOT-BRAINS/lib/ruby/1.8/sync.rb:281         ==   Kernel

c-return /apps/hgs/RUBY-STABLE-SNAPSHOT-BRAINS/lib/ruby/1.8/sync.rb:152  critical=   Thread

c-return /apps/hgs/RUBY-STABLE-SNAPSHOT-BRAINS/lib/ruby/1.8/sync.rb:163         ==   Kernel

c-return /apps/hgs/RUBY-STABLE-SNAPSHOT-BRAINS/lib/ruby/1.8/sync.rb:172    current   Thread

c-return /apps/hgs/RUBY-STABLE-SNAPSHOT-BRAINS/lib/ruby/1.8/sync.rb:201          >   Fixnum

  return ./syncbug.rb:109 add_observer        A

c-return /apps/hgs/RUBY-STABLE-SNAPSHOT-BRAINS/lib/ruby/1.8/sync.rb:141         ==   Kernel

c-return /apps/hgs/RUBY-STABLE-SNAPSHOT-BRAINS/lib/ruby/1.8/sync.rb:143  critical=   Thread

c-return /apps/hgs/RUBY-STABLE-SNAPSHOT-BRAINS/lib/ruby/1.8/sync.rb:280        ===   Symbol

c-return /apps/hgs/RUBY-STABLE-SNAPSHOT-BRAINS/lib/ruby/1.8/sync.rb:281         ==   Kernel

c-return /apps/hgs/RUBY-STABLE-SNAPSHOT-BRAINS/lib/ruby/1.8/sync.rb:284    current   Thread

c-return ./syncbug.rb:97         []      ENV

c-return ./syncbug.rb:118 initialize   Thread

c-return /apps/hgs/RUBY-STABLE-SNAPSHOT-BRAINS/lib/ruby/1.8/sync.rb:167        ===   Symbol

c-return /apps/hgs/RUBY-STABLE-SNAPSHOT-BRAINS/lib/ruby/1.8/sync.rb:172         ==   Kernel

c-return /apps/hgs/RUBY-STABLE-SNAPSHOT-BRAINS/lib/ruby/1.8/sync.rb:175    current   Thread

c-return /apps/hgs/RUBY-STABLE-SNAPSHOT-BRAINS/lib/ruby/1.8/sync.rb:201          >   Fixnum

pmap: cannot examine 29355: process is traced

c-return ./syncbug.rb:118 initialize   Thread

pmap: cannot examine 29355: process is traced

c-return /apps/hgs/RUBY-STABLE-SNAPSHOT-BRAINS/lib/ruby/1.8/sync.rb:281         ==   Kernel

  return /apps/hgs/RUBY-STABLE-SNAPSHOT-BRAINS/lib/ruby/1.8/sync.rb:260 sync_try_lock_sub   Sync_m

c-return /apps/hgs/RUBY-STABLE-SNAPSHOT-BRAINS/lib/ruby/1.8/sync.rb:152  critical=   Thread

  return /apps/hgs/RUBY-STABLE-SNAPSHOT-BRAINS/lib/ruby/1.8/sync.rb:141  sync_lock   Sync_m

pmap: cannot examine 29355: process is traced

  return ./syncbug.rb:104       meth        A

c-return ./syncbug.rb:118 initialize   Thread

  return ./syncbug.rb:119     notify        B

c-return /apps/hgs/RUBY-STABLE-SNAPSHOT-BRAINS/lib/ruby/1.8/sync.rb:141         ==   Kernel

  return ./syncbug.rb:119     notify        B

c-return ./syncbug.rb:118 initialize   Thread

  return ./syncbug.rb:119     notify        B

c-return /apps/hgs/RUBY-STABLE-SNAPSHOT-BRAINS/lib/ruby/1.8/sync.rb:167        ===   Symbol

c-return /apps/hgs/RUBY-STABLE-SNAPSHOT-BRAINS/lib/ruby/1.8/sync.rb:173          -   Fixnum

c-return /apps/hgs/RUBY-STABLE-SNAPSHOT-BRAINS/lib/ruby/1.8/sync.rb:173         ==   Fixnum

c-return /apps/hgs/RUBY-STABLE-SNAPSHOT-BRAINS/lib/ruby/1.8/sync.rb:175       hash   Kernel

c-return /apps/hgs/RUBY-STABLE-SNAPSHOT-BRAINS/lib/ruby/1.8/sync.rb:215  critical=   Thread

c-return ./syncbug.rb:118 initialize   Thread

c-return ./syncbug.rb:118        new   Thread

c-return /apps/hgs/RUBY-STABLE-SNAPSHOT-BRAINS/lib/ruby/1.8/sync.rb:173         ==   Fixnum

c-return /apps/hgs/RUBY-STABLE-SNAPSHOT-BRAINS/lib/ruby/1.8/sync.rb:175    current   Thread

c-return /apps/hgs/RUBY-STABLE-SNAPSHOT-BRAINS/lib/ruby/1.8/sync.rb:175       hash   Kernel

c-return /apps/hgs/RUBY-STABLE-SNAPSHOT-BRAINS/lib/ruby/1.8/sync.rb:201          >   Fixnum

c-return /apps/hgs/RUBY-STABLE-SNAPSHOT-BRAINS/lib/ruby/1.8/sync.rb:215  critical=   Thread

pmap: cannot examine 29355: process is traced

c-return /apps/hgs/RUBY-STABLE-SNAPSHOT-BRAINS/lib/ruby/1.8/sync.rb:281         ==   Kernel

c-return /apps/hgs/RUBY-STABLE-SNAPSHOT-BRAINS/lib/ruby/1.8/sync.rb:284    current   Thread

  return /apps/hgs/RUBY-STABLE-SNAPSHOT-BRAINS/lib/ruby/1.8/sync.rb:260 sync_try_lock_sub   Sync_m

c-return /apps/hgs/RUBY-STABLE-SNAPSHOT-BRAINS/lib/ruby/1.8/sync.rb:152  critical=   Thread

  return /apps/hgs/RUBY-STABLE-SNAPSHOT-BRAINS/lib/ruby/1.8/sync.rb:157 sync_unlock   Sync_m

  return /apps/hgs/RUBY-STABLE-SNAPSHOT-BRAINS/lib/ruby/1.8/sync.rb:233 synchronize   Sync_m

  return ./syncbug.rb:104       meth        A

c-return ./syncbug.rb:118 initialize   Thread

pmap: cannot examine 29355: process is traced

pmap: cannot examine 29355: process is traced

c-return ./syncbug.rb:118 initialize   Thread

c-return /apps/hgs/RUBY-STABLE-SNAPSHOT-BRAINS/lib/ruby/1.8/sync.rb:167        ===   Symbol

c-return /apps/hgs/RUBY-STABLE-SNAPSHOT-BRAINS/lib/ruby/1.8/sync.rb:172    current   Thread

c-return /apps/hgs/RUBY-STABLE-SNAPSHOT-BRAINS/lib/ruby/1.8/sync.rb:172         ==   Kernel

c-return /apps/hgs/RUBY-STABLE-SNAPSHOT-BRAINS/lib/ruby/1.8/sync.rb:173         ==   Fixnum

pmap: cannot examine 29355: process is traced

pmap: cannot examine 29355: process is traced

pmap: cannot examine 29355: process is traced

  return ./syncbug.rb:119     notify        B

c-return ./syncbug.rb:118 initialize   Thread

pmap: cannot examine 29355: process is traced

  return ./syncbug.rb:119     notify        B

c-return /apps/hgs/RUBY-STABLE-SNAPSHOT-BRAINS/lib/ruby/1.8/sync.rb:173          -   Fixnum

c-return /apps/hgs/RUBY-STABLE-SNAPSHOT-BRAINS/lib/ruby/1.8/sync.rb:173         ==   Fixnum

c-return /apps/hgs/RUBY-STABLE-SNAPSHOT-BRAINS/lib/ruby/1.8/sync.rb:175       hash   Kernel

c-return /apps/hgs/RUBY-STABLE-SNAPSHOT-BRAINS/lib/ruby/1.8/sync.rb:175   include?     Hash

c-return /apps/hgs/RUBY-STABLE-SNAPSHOT-BRAINS/lib/ruby/1.8/sync.rb:201       size    Array

c-return /apps/hgs/RUBY-STABLE-SNAPSHOT-BRAINS/lib/ruby/1.8/sync.rb:201          >   Fixnum

c-return /apps/hgs/RUBY-STABLE-SNAPSHOT-BRAINS/lib/ruby/1.8/sync.rb:215  critical=   Thread



brains hgs 12 %> exit


exit


script done on Mon Jul 10 13:46:20 2006
syncbug.rb (2.43 KB, application/x-sh)

In This Thread

Prev Next