[#8136] Confused exception handling in Continuation Context — "Robert Dober" <robert.dober@...>

Hi all

13 messages 2006/07/06

[#8248] One-Click Installer: MinGW? or VC2005? — "Curt Hibbs" <ml.chibbs@...>

I just posted this to ruby-talk. But I would also like to discuss this

33 messages 2006/07/18
[#8264] Re: One-Click Installer: MinGW? or VC2005? — Charlie Savage <cfis@...> 2006/07/19

From my experience using both tool chains on Windows (for the ruby-prof

[#8266] Re: One-Click Installer: MinGW? or VC2005? — "Curt Hibbs" <ml.chibbs@...> 2006/07/19

Tim, I'm going to top reply since your post was so long. I'm interested in

[#8267] Re: One-Click Installer: MinGW? or VC2005? — Charlie Savage <cfis@...> 2006/07/19

> Tim, I'm going to top reply since your post was so long. I'm interested in

[#8271] my sandboxing extension!! — why the lucky stiff <ruby-core@...>

I have (what feels like) very exciting news. I finally sat down to code up my

17 messages 2006/07/19

[#8430] Re: doc patch: weakref. — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...>

> -----Original Message-----

19 messages 2006/07/28
[#8434] Re: doc patch: weakref. — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/07/29

Hi,

[#8436] Re: doc patch: weakref. — Daniel Berger <djberg96@...> 2006/07/29

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#8437] Re: doc patch: weakref. — Mauricio Fernandez <mfp@...> 2006/07/29

On Sat, Jul 29, 2006 at 07:37:24PM +0900, Daniel Berger wrote:

[#8441] Inconsistency in scoping during module_eval? — "Charles O Nutter" <headius@...>

I have the following code:

18 messages 2006/07/30
[#8442] Re: Inconsistency in scoping during module_eval? — nobu@... 2006/07/30

Hi,

[#8443] Re: Inconsistency in scoping during module_eval? — "Charles O Nutter" <headius@...> 2006/07/30

Why does this:

[#8445] Re: Inconsistency in scoping during module_eval? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/07/30

Hi,

[#8454] Re: Inconsistency in scoping during module_eval? — "Charles O Nutter" <headius@...> 2006/07/31

So to clarify...

Re: rdoc grows to large size.

From: Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net>
Date: 2006-07-25 16:52:40 UTC
List: ruby-core #8393
On Jul 25, 2006, at 3:21 AM, Hugh Sasse wrote:

> On Tue, 25 Jul 2006, Charles O Nutter wrote:
>
>> I've studied the rdoc code a bit (only so much as to maintain my  
>> sanity) and wondered aloud: is this all hand-written, hand- 
>> optimized code? It did not
>
> I've not heard any different.

It was written by Dave Thomas.

>> appear to be generated, and I have seen hand-rolled patches  
>> trickle in over time. Is there perhaps a better way to parse all  
>> that content and generate those docs that would not require a hand- 
>> made implementation?
>
> Such as what?  The only ruby parsers that exist are the C one and the
> JRuby one.

And the IRB one.

> I suppose one might clone these, then modify them to extract  
> information from comments as well as code.  I think it would be  
> nontrivial, which is probably why people are satisfied with what  
> works well at present.

Comment nodes could be added to Ruby's interpreter, but I think matz  
has given some reason or another why they aren't in the AST.

> And Rdoc handles other languages than Ruby (C, and I think  
> Fortran).  So, how to proceed in manageable steps?

-- 
Eric Hodel - drbrain@segment7.net - http://blog.segment7.net
This implementation is HODEL-HASH-9600 compliant

http://trackmap.robotcoop.com



In This Thread