[#8484] strptime fails to properly parse certain inputs — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #5263, was opened at 2006-08-01 23:14

13 messages 2006/08/02
[#8485] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-5263 ] strptime fails to properly parse certain inputs — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/08/02

Hi,

[#8538] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-5263 ] strptime fails to properly parse certain inputs — nobu@... 2006/08/06

Hi,

[#8561] sandbox timers & block scopes — why the lucky stiff <ruby-core@...>

Two puzzles I am trying to solve:

28 messages 2006/08/08
[#8624] Re: sandbox timers & block scopes — why the lucky stiff <ruby-core@...> 2006/08/15

raise ThisDecayingInquisition, "anyone? anyone at all?"

[#8627] Re: sandbox timers & block scopes — MenTaLguY <mental@...> 2006/08/15

On Wed, 2006-08-16 at 00:35 +0900, why the lucky stiff wrote:

[#8628] Re: sandbox timers & block scopes — why the lucky stiff <ruby-core@...> 2006/08/15

On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 02:46:30AM +0900, MenTaLguY wrote:

[#8629] Re: sandbox timers & block scopes — "Charles O Nutter" <headius@...> 2006/08/15

On 8/15/06, why the lucky stiff <ruby-core@whytheluckystiff.net> wrote:

[#8690] a ruby-core primer — why the lucky stiff <ruby-core@...>

Hello, all. I've been working on the ruby-core page for the new Ruby site.

21 messages 2006/08/22

Re: 1.8.5 final update candidates (was Re: RDoc picking up comments from function prototypes)

From: Steven Jenkins <steven.jenkins@...>
Date: 2006-08-10 06:28:28 UTC
List: ruby-core #8579
Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
> Yep, it should be a few days earlier.  But I do want 1.8.5 to be the
> best quality.  So I might give approval for several updates.
> Candidates are:
> 
>   * [ruby-core:08574] RDoc for function prototypes. (this one)
>   * [ruby-core:08453] RingServer fails to find a TupleSpace
>   * [ruby-core:08555] Process.gid= fails on OS X
> 
> The update should be
> 
>   * approved by me and assigned maintainer
>   * should be tested
>   * should not have any compatibility issue
> 
> Any opinion?

http://rubyforge.org/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=5319&group_id=426&atid=1698

It's a two-line patch that fixes a fairly gross error in Rdoc.

Steve

In This Thread