[#8136] Confused exception handling in Continuation Context — "Robert Dober" <robert.dober@...>

Hi all

13 messages 2006/07/06

[#8248] One-Click Installer: MinGW? or VC2005? — "Curt Hibbs" <ml.chibbs@...>

I just posted this to ruby-talk. But I would also like to discuss this

33 messages 2006/07/18
[#8264] Re: One-Click Installer: MinGW? or VC2005? — Charlie Savage <cfis@...> 2006/07/19

From my experience using both tool chains on Windows (for the ruby-prof

[#8266] Re: One-Click Installer: MinGW? or VC2005? — "Curt Hibbs" <ml.chibbs@...> 2006/07/19

Tim, I'm going to top reply since your post was so long. I'm interested in

[#8267] Re: One-Click Installer: MinGW? or VC2005? — Charlie Savage <cfis@...> 2006/07/19

> Tim, I'm going to top reply since your post was so long. I'm interested in

[#8271] my sandboxing extension!! — why the lucky stiff <ruby-core@...>

I have (what feels like) very exciting news. I finally sat down to code up my

17 messages 2006/07/19

[#8430] Re: doc patch: weakref. — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...>

> -----Original Message-----

19 messages 2006/07/28
[#8434] Re: doc patch: weakref. — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/07/29

Hi,

[#8436] Re: doc patch: weakref. — Daniel Berger <djberg96@...> 2006/07/29

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#8437] Re: doc patch: weakref. — Mauricio Fernandez <mfp@...> 2006/07/29

On Sat, Jul 29, 2006 at 07:37:24PM +0900, Daniel Berger wrote:

[#8441] Inconsistency in scoping during module_eval? — "Charles O Nutter" <headius@...>

I have the following code:

18 messages 2006/07/30
[#8442] Re: Inconsistency in scoping during module_eval? — nobu@... 2006/07/30

Hi,

[#8443] Re: Inconsistency in scoping during module_eval? — "Charles O Nutter" <headius@...> 2006/07/30

Why does this:

[#8445] Re: Inconsistency in scoping during module_eval? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/07/30

Hi,

[#8454] Re: Inconsistency in scoping during module_eval? — "Charles O Nutter" <headius@...> 2006/07/31

So to clarify...

Re: Patch for Unix socket peer credentials

From: Sam Roberts <sroberts@...>
Date: 2006-07-24 19:40:02 UTC
List: ruby-core #8384
On Sat, Jul 22, 2006 at 03:54:19PM +0900, Tanaka Akira wrote:
> > Are negative values allowed on Linux? AFAICT, if the credentials aren't 
> > available on Linux, say when I check a TCPServer socket's credentials
> > after accepting a connection from another host, the system call returns
> > 0 but sets the uid & gid to -1:

Whether allowed or not by the OS, returning -1 in the hash as :uid and
:gid seems reasonable, it makes the Socket method behave like the
underlying system call, so less surprising to users, and if they want to
know what -1 means, they can read the man page for their system.

At least some binutils don't seem to think a uid can be negative,

  GNU coreutils 5.93, id.c:print_user() ... printf ("%lu", (unsigned long int) uid)


Perhaps more interesting to this list, ruby's File::chown doesn't allow -1 as a
uid or gid, though it does allow other negative values:

    File.chown(owner_int, group_int, file_name,... ) -> integer
    ...
    A +nil+ or -1 owner or group id is ignored.
    ...

root:/tmp # ruby -e'File.chown(-2, -2, "neg2")'
root:/tmp # ls -l neg2
-rw-r--r-- 1 4294967294 4294967294 0 2006-07-24 12:15 neg2
root:/tmp # ruby -e'File.chown(-1, -3, "neg2")'
root:/tmp # ls -l neg2
-rw-r--r-- 1 4294967294 4294967293 0 2006-07-24 12:15 neg2
root:/tmp # ruby -e'File.chown(-3, -1, "neg2")'
root:/tmp # ls -l neg2
-rw-r--r-- 1 4294967293 4294967293 0 2006-07-24 12:15 neg2


Maybe only nil should be ignored?

Cheers,
Sam


In This Thread