[#68478] Looking for MRI projects for Ruby Google Summer of Code 2015 — Tony Arcieri <bascule@...>
Hi ruby-core,
10 messages
2015/03/10
[#68480] Re: Looking for MRI projects for Ruby Google Summer of Code 2015
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2015/03/10
I have.
[#68549] Re: Looking for MRI projects for Ruby Google Summer of Code 2015
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2015/03/17
I sent several ideas on previous, mail, but they are seems rejected?
[#68493] [Ruby trunk - Feature #10532] [PATCH] accept_nonblock supports "exception: false" — nobu@...
Issue #10532 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.
5 messages
2015/03/11
[#68503] Re: [Ruby trunk - Feature #10532] [PATCH] accept_nonblock supports "exception: false"
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2015/03/12
Committed as r49948.
[#68504] Re: [Ruby trunk - Feature #10532] [PATCH] accept_nonblock supports "exception: false"
— Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...>
2015/03/12
On 2015/03/12 12:08, Eric Wong wrote:
[#68506] Seven stacks (and two questions) — Jakub Trzebiatowski <jaktrze1@...>
The Ruby Hacking Guide says that Ruby has窶ヲ seven stacks. Is it an implementation choice (and it could be implemented with one stack), or is there really a need for seven logical stacks? For example, Lua has one stack, and still closures with upvalues are totally possible (it窶冱 like Ruby窶冱 blocks that can reference local variables of their enclosing method, but it works for any function with any upvalues).
5 messages
2015/03/12
[#68520] Possible regression in 2.1 and 2.2 in binding when combined with delegate? — Joe Swatosh <joe.swatosh@...>
# The following code
3 messages
2015/03/14
[#68604] GSOC project Cross-thread Fiber support — surya pratap singh raghuvanshi <oshosurya@...>
- *hi i am a third year computer science student interested in working
6 messages
2015/03/22
[#68606] Re: GSOC project Cross-thread Fiber support
— Tony Arcieri <bascule@...>
2015/03/22
Hi Surya,
[#68619] Re: GSOC project Cross-thread Fiber support
— surya pratap singh raghuvanshi <oshosurya@...>
2015/03/23
hi tony,
[ruby-core:68666] [Ruby trunk - Feature #11007] Prime.each.with_index should accept offset
From:
nobu@...
Date:
2015-03-28 03:02:20 UTC
List:
ruby-core #68666
Issue #11007 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.
`Kernel#proc` captures the block given to the caller.
~~~ruby
def with_index(offset = 0)
return enum_for(:with_index) unless block_given?
# if offset == 0, use each_with_index, which is faster because of C implementation.
return each_with_index(&proc) if offset == 0
each do |prime|
yield prime, offset
offset += 1
end
end
~~~
and `enum = Prime.each` is needed before loop again.
It's better to split the test.
----------------------------------------
Feature #11007: Prime.each.with_index should accept offset
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/11007#change-51959
* Author: T Yamada
* Status: Open
* Priority: Normal
* Assignee: Marc-Andre Lafortune
----------------------------------------
I'd like to execute following code:
~~~
Prime.each(10).with_index(1){|e,i|
print i,' ',e,"\n"
}
~~~
Expected output:
~~~
1 2
2 3
3 5
4 7
~~~
I have attached a patch.
---Files--------------------------------
prime.diff (1.09 KB)
--
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/