[#68478] Looking for MRI projects for Ruby Google Summer of Code 2015 — Tony Arcieri <bascule@...>
Hi ruby-core,
10 messages
2015/03/10
[#68480] Re: Looking for MRI projects for Ruby Google Summer of Code 2015
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2015/03/10
I have.
[#68549] Re: Looking for MRI projects for Ruby Google Summer of Code 2015
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2015/03/17
I sent several ideas on previous, mail, but they are seems rejected?
[#68493] [Ruby trunk - Feature #10532] [PATCH] accept_nonblock supports "exception: false" — nobu@...
Issue #10532 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.
5 messages
2015/03/11
[#68503] Re: [Ruby trunk - Feature #10532] [PATCH] accept_nonblock supports "exception: false"
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2015/03/12
Committed as r49948.
[#68504] Re: [Ruby trunk - Feature #10532] [PATCH] accept_nonblock supports "exception: false"
— Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...>
2015/03/12
On 2015/03/12 12:08, Eric Wong wrote:
[#68506] Seven stacks (and two questions) — Jakub Trzebiatowski <jaktrze1@...>
The Ruby Hacking Guide says that Ruby has窶ヲ seven stacks. Is it an implementation choice (and it could be implemented with one stack), or is there really a need for seven logical stacks? For example, Lua has one stack, and still closures with upvalues are totally possible (it窶冱 like Ruby窶冱 blocks that can reference local variables of their enclosing method, but it works for any function with any upvalues).
5 messages
2015/03/12
[#68520] Possible regression in 2.1 and 2.2 in binding when combined with delegate? — Joe Swatosh <joe.swatosh@...>
# The following code
3 messages
2015/03/14
[#68604] GSOC project Cross-thread Fiber support — surya pratap singh raghuvanshi <oshosurya@...>
- *hi i am a third year computer science student interested in working
6 messages
2015/03/22
[#68606] Re: GSOC project Cross-thread Fiber support
— Tony Arcieri <bascule@...>
2015/03/22
Hi Surya,
[#68619] Re: GSOC project Cross-thread Fiber support
— surya pratap singh raghuvanshi <oshosurya@...>
2015/03/23
hi tony,
[ruby-core:68511] Re: [Ruby trunk - Feature #10532] [PATCH] accept_nonblock supports "exception: false"
From:
Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
Date:
2015-03-12 19:37:12 UTC
List:
ruby-core #68511
Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org> wrote: > On 2015/03/12 17:38, Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote: > > On 2015/03/12 12:08, Eric Wong wrote: > >> I think the st_delete call in rb_get_kwargs interacts badly with with > >> keyword optimizations ko1 did in 2.2. My work-in-progress patch > >> gets stuck on the OpenSSL read_nonblock (from > >> ext/openssl/lib/openssl/buffering.rb) in test/openssl/test_ssl.rb > > > > It is an intentional behavior. > > > > Add this after `rb_get_kwargs()` call. > > > > if (except != Qundef) > > rb_hash_aset(opts, ID2SYM(id_exception), except); That seems tricky. We should to document it, at least: diff --git a/README.EXT b/README.EXT index f24029c..f87ad85 100644 --- a/README.EXT +++ b/README.EXT @@ -1308,7 +1308,8 @@ rb_scan_args(int argc, VALUE *argv, const char *fmt, ...) :: int rb_get_kwargs(VALUE keyword_hash, const ID *table, int required, int optional, VALUE *values) Retrieves argument VALUEs bound to keywords, which directed by +table+ - into +values+. First +required+ number of IDs referred by +table+ are + into +values+, deleting retrieved entries from +keyword_hash+ along + the way. First +required+ number of IDs referred by +table+ are mandatory, and succeeding +optional+ (- +optional+ - 1 if +optional+ is negative) number of IDs are optional. If a mandatory key is not contained in +keyword_hash+, raises "missing @@ -1316,7 +1317,8 @@ int rb_get_kwargs(VALUE keyword_hash, const ID *table, int required, int optiona +keyword_hash+, the corresponding element in +values+ is not changed. If +optional+ is negative, rest of +keyword_hash+ are stored in the next to optional +values+ as a new Hash, otherwise raises "unknown - keyword" +ArgumentError+. + keyword" +ArgumentError+. If +values+ is NULL, +keyword_hash+ is + not modified and only error checking is performed. VALUE rb_extract_keywords(VALUE *original_hash) I'll commit the above unless somebody else has better ideas. > Or you can just `rb_hash_lookup2(opts, ID2SYM(id_exception), Qundef)`, > if you want to pass the whole options without checking. Alright, I'll do that (not much different from current rb_hash_aref).