[#68478] Looking for MRI projects for Ruby Google Summer of Code 2015 — Tony Arcieri <bascule@...>
Hi ruby-core,
10 messages
2015/03/10
[#68480] Re: Looking for MRI projects for Ruby Google Summer of Code 2015
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2015/03/10
I have.
[#68549] Re: Looking for MRI projects for Ruby Google Summer of Code 2015
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2015/03/17
I sent several ideas on previous, mail, but they are seems rejected?
[#68493] [Ruby trunk - Feature #10532] [PATCH] accept_nonblock supports "exception: false" — nobu@...
Issue #10532 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.
5 messages
2015/03/11
[#68503] Re: [Ruby trunk - Feature #10532] [PATCH] accept_nonblock supports "exception: false"
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2015/03/12
Committed as r49948.
[#68504] Re: [Ruby trunk - Feature #10532] [PATCH] accept_nonblock supports "exception: false"
— Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...>
2015/03/12
On 2015/03/12 12:08, Eric Wong wrote:
[#68506] Seven stacks (and two questions) — Jakub Trzebiatowski <jaktrze1@...>
The Ruby Hacking Guide says that Ruby has窶ヲ seven stacks. Is it an implementation choice (and it could be implemented with one stack), or is there really a need for seven logical stacks? For example, Lua has one stack, and still closures with upvalues are totally possible (it窶冱 like Ruby窶冱 blocks that can reference local variables of their enclosing method, but it works for any function with any upvalues).
5 messages
2015/03/12
[#68520] Possible regression in 2.1 and 2.2 in binding when combined with delegate? — Joe Swatosh <joe.swatosh@...>
# The following code
3 messages
2015/03/14
[#68604] GSOC project Cross-thread Fiber support — surya pratap singh raghuvanshi <oshosurya@...>
- *hi i am a third year computer science student interested in working
6 messages
2015/03/22
[#68606] Re: GSOC project Cross-thread Fiber support
— Tony Arcieri <bascule@...>
2015/03/22
Hi Surya,
[#68619] Re: GSOC project Cross-thread Fiber support
— surya pratap singh raghuvanshi <oshosurya@...>
2015/03/23
hi tony,
[ruby-core:68660] [Ruby trunk - Bug #10015] Performance regression in Dir#[]
From:
adrien.siami@...
Date:
2015-03-27 23:20:34 UTC
List:
ruby-core #68660
Issue #10015 has been updated by Adrien Siami.
I've noticed a significant slowdown of a rails app when using ruby 2.2.1 rather than 2.1.5.
A slow page was running in 16 seconds with 2.2.1 where it was running in less than 3 seconds with 2.1.5
I tested this very simple benchmark :
~~~
require 'benchmark'
puts Benchmark.realtime {
800000.times do
Dir['/tmp']
end
}
~~~
it runs in 3.1289695860032225 secs with 2.2.1 and 2.403 secs with 2.1.5
Is this issue still present ?
----------------------------------------
Bug #10015: Performance regression in Dir#[]
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/10015#change-51953
* Author: Aaron Patterson
* Status: Closed
* Priority: Normal
* Assignee:
* ruby -v: ruby 2.2.0dev (2014-02-04 trunk 44802) [x86_64-darwin13.0]
* Backport: 2.0.0: UNKNOWN, 2.1: UNKNOWN
----------------------------------------
r44802 seems to have introduced a performance regression in Dir#[].
Here is the test program:
~~~ruby
require 'benchmark'
puts Benchmark.realtime {
glob = "minitest/*_plugin.rb{,.rb,.bundle}"
$LOAD_PATH.map { |load_path|
Dir["#{File.expand_path glob, load_path}"]
}.flatten.select { |file| File.file? file.untaint }
}
~~~
Here is the test time for me:
~~~
$ ruby -v test.rb
ruby 2.2.0dev (2014-02-04 trunk 44801) [x86_64-darwin13.0]
0.000341
$ ruby -v test.rb
ruby 2.2.0dev (2014-02-04 trunk 44802) [x86_64-darwin13.0]
0.009333
~~~
r44801 seems much faster than r44802.
--
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/