[#68478] Looking for MRI projects for Ruby Google Summer of Code 2015 — Tony Arcieri <bascule@...>
Hi ruby-core,
10 messages
2015/03/10
[#68480] Re: Looking for MRI projects for Ruby Google Summer of Code 2015
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2015/03/10
I have.
[#68549] Re: Looking for MRI projects for Ruby Google Summer of Code 2015
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2015/03/17
I sent several ideas on previous, mail, but they are seems rejected?
[#68493] [Ruby trunk - Feature #10532] [PATCH] accept_nonblock supports "exception: false" — nobu@...
Issue #10532 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.
5 messages
2015/03/11
[#68503] Re: [Ruby trunk - Feature #10532] [PATCH] accept_nonblock supports "exception: false"
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2015/03/12
Committed as r49948.
[#68504] Re: [Ruby trunk - Feature #10532] [PATCH] accept_nonblock supports "exception: false"
— Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...>
2015/03/12
On 2015/03/12 12:08, Eric Wong wrote:
[#68506] Seven stacks (and two questions) — Jakub Trzebiatowski <jaktrze1@...>
The Ruby Hacking Guide says that Ruby has=E2=80=A6 seven stacks. Is it =
5 messages
2015/03/12
[#68520] Possible regression in 2.1 and 2.2 in binding when combined with delegate? — Joe Swatosh <joe.swatosh@...>
# The following code
3 messages
2015/03/14
[#68604] GSOC project Cross-thread Fiber support — surya pratap singh raghuvanshi <oshosurya@...>
- *hi i am a third year computer science student interested in working
6 messages
2015/03/22
[#68606] Re: GSOC project Cross-thread Fiber support
— Tony Arcieri <bascule@...>
2015/03/22
Hi Surya,
[#68619] Re: GSOC project Cross-thread Fiber support
— surya pratap singh raghuvanshi <oshosurya@...>
2015/03/23
hi tony,
[ruby-core:68701] Re: [Ruby trunk - Bug #10943] Singleton class expression (class << obj) should make be indivisual namespaces
From:
Aaron Patterson <tenderlove@...>
Date:
2015-03-30 22:16:22 UTC
List:
ruby-core #68701
On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 10:56:08AM +0000, ko1@atdot.net wrote: > This is bug fix, but it changes Ruby semantics largely. I'm not sure how > to treat it. I think it depends on the size of the patch. If it's large (like you say) then backport risk is high. If there's a smaller patch that just fixes [Bug #10871], maybe consider backporting that? [Bug #10871] is happening when running Rails in a threaded webserver, which is pretty common. But I don't think I've seen the same style of code in many cases. > Matz said that "we can not expect how affect this change for existing applications, so that no > need for older versions". > > Please discuss about it. I think we should go with your fixes in 2.3. If it breaks someone's code you can have them blame me! :) -- Aaron Patterson http://tenderlovemaking.com/