[#68478] Looking for MRI projects for Ruby Google Summer of Code 2015 — Tony Arcieri <bascule@...>
Hi ruby-core,
10 messages
2015/03/10
[#68480] Re: Looking for MRI projects for Ruby Google Summer of Code 2015
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2015/03/10
I have.
[#68549] Re: Looking for MRI projects for Ruby Google Summer of Code 2015
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2015/03/17
I sent several ideas on previous, mail, but they are seems rejected?
[#68493] [Ruby trunk - Feature #10532] [PATCH] accept_nonblock supports "exception: false" — nobu@...
Issue #10532 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.
5 messages
2015/03/11
[#68503] Re: [Ruby trunk - Feature #10532] [PATCH] accept_nonblock supports "exception: false"
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2015/03/12
Committed as r49948.
[#68504] Re: [Ruby trunk - Feature #10532] [PATCH] accept_nonblock supports "exception: false"
— Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...>
2015/03/12
On 2015/03/12 12:08, Eric Wong wrote:
[#68506] Seven stacks (and two questions) — Jakub Trzebiatowski <jaktrze1@...>
The Ruby Hacking Guide says that Ruby has窶ヲ seven stacks. Is it an implementation choice (and it could be implemented with one stack), or is there really a need for seven logical stacks? For example, Lua has one stack, and still closures with upvalues are totally possible (it窶冱 like Ruby窶冱 blocks that can reference local variables of their enclosing method, but it works for any function with any upvalues).
5 messages
2015/03/12
[#68520] Possible regression in 2.1 and 2.2 in binding when combined with delegate? — Joe Swatosh <joe.swatosh@...>
# The following code
3 messages
2015/03/14
[#68604] GSOC project Cross-thread Fiber support — surya pratap singh raghuvanshi <oshosurya@...>
- *hi i am a third year computer science student interested in working
6 messages
2015/03/22
[#68606] Re: GSOC project Cross-thread Fiber support
— Tony Arcieri <bascule@...>
2015/03/22
Hi Surya,
[#68619] Re: GSOC project Cross-thread Fiber support
— surya pratap singh raghuvanshi <oshosurya@...>
2015/03/23
hi tony,
[ruby-core:68460] [Ruby trunk - Feature #10949] Time is shady
From:
ko1@...
Date:
2015-03-08 22:08:30 UTC
List:
ruby-core #68460
Issue #10949 has been updated by Koichi Sasada. We use a terminology "WB unprotected object" (past we had said "shady object"). If there is a non-bug, perfect patch, it is welcome. I didn't touch Time objects because I assume they are short-lived objects. If this assumption is not true, please tell me (with age data). You can check ages by allocation_tracer gem. ---------------------------------------- Feature #10949: Time is shady https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/10949#change-51805 * Author: Sylvain Joyeux * Status: Open * Priority: Normal * Assignee: ---------------------------------------- Ruby's built-in Time object is shady. Unfortunately, it is an object that can commonly be created in big numbers (think logs or stuff like that), and since they don't store relationship with other objects they are perfect candidate for the oldgen. I don't really know if there is a kind of policy about which built-in Ruby objects should be sunny or not, so I just put this as a feature request (as opposed to having it as a bug) -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/