[#68478] Looking for MRI projects for Ruby Google Summer of Code 2015 — Tony Arcieri <bascule@...>
Hi ruby-core,
10 messages
2015/03/10
[#68480] Re: Looking for MRI projects for Ruby Google Summer of Code 2015
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2015/03/10
I have.
[#68549] Re: Looking for MRI projects for Ruby Google Summer of Code 2015
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2015/03/17
I sent several ideas on previous, mail, but they are seems rejected?
[#68493] [Ruby trunk - Feature #10532] [PATCH] accept_nonblock supports "exception: false" — nobu@...
Issue #10532 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.
5 messages
2015/03/11
[#68503] Re: [Ruby trunk - Feature #10532] [PATCH] accept_nonblock supports "exception: false"
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2015/03/12
Committed as r49948.
[#68504] Re: [Ruby trunk - Feature #10532] [PATCH] accept_nonblock supports "exception: false"
— Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...>
2015/03/12
On 2015/03/12 12:08, Eric Wong wrote:
[#68506] Seven stacks (and two questions) — Jakub Trzebiatowski <jaktrze1@...>
The Ruby Hacking Guide says that Ruby has窶ヲ seven stacks. Is it an implementation choice (and it could be implemented with one stack), or is there really a need for seven logical stacks? For example, Lua has one stack, and still closures with upvalues are totally possible (it窶冱 like Ruby窶冱 blocks that can reference local variables of their enclosing method, but it works for any function with any upvalues).
5 messages
2015/03/12
[#68520] Possible regression in 2.1 and 2.2 in binding when combined with delegate? — Joe Swatosh <joe.swatosh@...>
# The following code
3 messages
2015/03/14
[#68604] GSOC project Cross-thread Fiber support — surya pratap singh raghuvanshi <oshosurya@...>
- *hi i am a third year computer science student interested in working
6 messages
2015/03/22
[#68606] Re: GSOC project Cross-thread Fiber support
— Tony Arcieri <bascule@...>
2015/03/22
Hi Surya,
[#68619] Re: GSOC project Cross-thread Fiber support
— surya pratap singh raghuvanshi <oshosurya@...>
2015/03/23
hi tony,
[ruby-core:68545] [Ruby trunk - Bug #10821] mkmf.rb: Incorrect have_devel? test depending on run order
From:
nagachika00@...
Date:
2015-03-17 16:57:20 UTC
List:
ruby-core #68545
Issue #10821 has been updated by Tomoyuki Chikanaga. Backport changed from 2.0.0: DONE, 2.1: REQUIRED, 2.2: DONE to 2.0.0: DONE, 2.1: DONE, 2.2: DONE Backported into `ruby_2_1` branch at r49993. ---------------------------------------- Bug #10821: mkmf.rb: Incorrect have_devel? test depending on run order https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/10821#change-51864 * Author: Joshua Peek * Status: Closed * Priority: Normal * Assignee: * ruby -v: ruby 2.1.2p95 (2014-05-08 revision 45877) [x86_64-darwin14.0] * Backport: 2.0.0: DONE, 2.1: DONE, 2.2: DONE ---------------------------------------- have_devel? is usually lazily checked on the first call to try_do(). However, try_do() may be invoked within the scope of a with_ldflags or with_cflags block. If have_devel? is checked for the first time with altered test LDFLAGS or CFLAGS it may crash. ~~~ # extconf.rb $LDFLAGS = "-L/custom/path/to/lib try_ldflags "-Issl" # try_ldflags -> try_link -> try_do -> have_devel (with incorrect $LDFLAG in scope) ~~~ -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/