[#68478] Looking for MRI projects for Ruby Google Summer of Code 2015 — Tony Arcieri <bascule@...>
Hi ruby-core,
10 messages
2015/03/10
[#68480] Re: Looking for MRI projects for Ruby Google Summer of Code 2015
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2015/03/10
I have.
[#68549] Re: Looking for MRI projects for Ruby Google Summer of Code 2015
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2015/03/17
I sent several ideas on previous, mail, but they are seems rejected?
[#68493] [Ruby trunk - Feature #10532] [PATCH] accept_nonblock supports "exception: false" — nobu@...
Issue #10532 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.
5 messages
2015/03/11
[#68503] Re: [Ruby trunk - Feature #10532] [PATCH] accept_nonblock supports "exception: false"
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2015/03/12
Committed as r49948.
[#68504] Re: [Ruby trunk - Feature #10532] [PATCH] accept_nonblock supports "exception: false"
— Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...>
2015/03/12
On 2015/03/12 12:08, Eric Wong wrote:
[#68506] Seven stacks (and two questions) — Jakub Trzebiatowski <jaktrze1@...>
The Ruby Hacking Guide says that Ruby has窶ヲ seven stacks. Is it an implementation choice (and it could be implemented with one stack), or is there really a need for seven logical stacks? For example, Lua has one stack, and still closures with upvalues are totally possible (it窶冱 like Ruby窶冱 blocks that can reference local variables of their enclosing method, but it works for any function with any upvalues).
5 messages
2015/03/12
[#68520] Possible regression in 2.1 and 2.2 in binding when combined with delegate? — Joe Swatosh <joe.swatosh@...>
# The following code
3 messages
2015/03/14
[#68604] GSOC project Cross-thread Fiber support — surya pratap singh raghuvanshi <oshosurya@...>
- *hi i am a third year computer science student interested in working
6 messages
2015/03/22
[#68606] Re: GSOC project Cross-thread Fiber support
— Tony Arcieri <bascule@...>
2015/03/22
Hi Surya,
[#68619] Re: GSOC project Cross-thread Fiber support
— surya pratap singh raghuvanshi <oshosurya@...>
2015/03/23
hi tony,
[ruby-core:68363] [Ruby trunk - Feature #10548] remove callcc (Callcc is now going obsoleted. Please use Fiber.)
From:
me@...
Date:
2015-03-01 02:52:11 UTC
List:
ruby-core #68363
Issue #10548 has been updated by Stephen Prater. I agree with Yusuke. I'd be sorry to see it go - it does some neat tricks that are a lot harder to pull off with Fibers. Here for instance is a PoC reversible debugger: https://gist.github.com/stephenprater/ca312d24578455f36550 I don't think you can do that with Fibers, since the control flow with fibers is still always forward. prater ---------------------------------------- Feature #10548: remove callcc (Callcc is now going obsoleted. Please use Fiber.) https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/10548#change-51711 * Author: Masaya Tarui * Status: Open * Priority: Normal * Assignee: ---------------------------------------- We are paying a lot of costs for callcc's consistency. and currently, we can use Fiber in many situation. In https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/projects/ruby/wiki/DevelopersMeeting20140517Japan, matz agreed to remove callcc. If there is no refutation, remove callcc in the future version. -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/