[#68478] Looking for MRI projects for Ruby Google Summer of Code 2015 — Tony Arcieri <bascule@...>
Hi ruby-core,
10 messages
2015/03/10
[#68480] Re: Looking for MRI projects for Ruby Google Summer of Code 2015
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2015/03/10
I have.
[#68549] Re: Looking for MRI projects for Ruby Google Summer of Code 2015
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2015/03/17
I sent several ideas on previous, mail, but they are seems rejected?
[#68493] [Ruby trunk - Feature #10532] [PATCH] accept_nonblock supports "exception: false" — nobu@...
Issue #10532 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.
5 messages
2015/03/11
[#68503] Re: [Ruby trunk - Feature #10532] [PATCH] accept_nonblock supports "exception: false"
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2015/03/12
Committed as r49948.
[#68504] Re: [Ruby trunk - Feature #10532] [PATCH] accept_nonblock supports "exception: false"
— Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...>
2015/03/12
On 2015/03/12 12:08, Eric Wong wrote:
[#68506] Seven stacks (and two questions) — Jakub Trzebiatowski <jaktrze1@...>
The Ruby Hacking Guide says that Ruby has窶ヲ seven stacks. Is it an implementation choice (and it could be implemented with one stack), or is there really a need for seven logical stacks? For example, Lua has one stack, and still closures with upvalues are totally possible (it窶冱 like Ruby窶冱 blocks that can reference local variables of their enclosing method, but it works for any function with any upvalues).
5 messages
2015/03/12
[#68520] Possible regression in 2.1 and 2.2 in binding when combined with delegate? — Joe Swatosh <joe.swatosh@...>
# The following code
3 messages
2015/03/14
[#68604] GSOC project Cross-thread Fiber support — surya pratap singh raghuvanshi <oshosurya@...>
- *hi i am a third year computer science student interested in working
6 messages
2015/03/22
[#68606] Re: GSOC project Cross-thread Fiber support
— Tony Arcieri <bascule@...>
2015/03/22
Hi Surya,
[#68619] Re: GSOC project Cross-thread Fiber support
— surya pratap singh raghuvanshi <oshosurya@...>
2015/03/23
hi tony,
[ruby-core:68474] [Ruby trunk - Bug #10954] [Feedback] FreeBSD 9.1でコンパイルできない(libprocstatのチェックに漏れがある)
From:
nobu@...
Date:
2015-03-10 02:50:02 UTC
List:
ruby-core #68474
Issue #10954 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.
Status changed from Open to Feedback
これでどうでしょうか。
~~~diff
diff --git i/configure.in w/configure.in
index 88a13a3..e278261 100644
--- i/configure.in
+++ w/configure.in
@@ -3143,6 +3143,9 @@ fi
AS_CASE(["$target_os"],
[freebsd*], [
AC_CHECK_LIB([procstat], [procstat_open_sysctl])
+ if test "x$ac_cv_lib_procstat_procstat_open_sysctl" = xyes; then
+ AC_CHECK_FUNCS(procstat_getvmmap)
+ fi
])
AS_CASE(["$target_cpu-$target_os"],
[*-darwin*], [
diff --git i/vm_dump.c w/vm_dump.c
index a0d8bcb..6470aee 100644
--- i/vm_dump.c
+++ w/vm_dump.c
@@ -735,7 +735,11 @@ procstat_vm(struct procstat *procstat, struct kinfo_proc *kipp)
ptrwidth, "START", ptrwidth, "END", "PRT", "RES",
"PRES", "REF", "SHD", "FL", "TP", "PATH");
+#ifdef HAVE_PROCSTAT_GETVMMAP
freep = procstat_getvmmap(procstat, kipp, &cnt);
+#else
+ freep = kinfo_getvmmap(kipp->ki_pid, &cnt);
+#endif
if (freep == NULL)
return;
for (i = 0; i < cnt; i++) {
~~~
> (ところでfiddleのlibffiが-fPICを付けられていないのでビルドに失敗する問題が別にあるのですが、そちらはとりあえず2.2.2まで待ってみます。)
パッケージシステムにlibffiがあるならそちらでインストールしてください。
----------------------------------------
Bug #10954: FreeBSD 9.1でコンパイルできない(libprocstatのチェックに漏れがある)
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/10954#change-51815
* Author: t yama
* Status: Feedback
* Priority: Normal
* Assignee:
* ruby -v: ruby 2.2.1p85 (2015-02-26 revision 49769) [x86_64-freebsd9.1]
* Backport: 2.0.0: UNKNOWN, 2.1: UNKNOWN, 2.2: UNKNOWN
----------------------------------------
ruby-2.2.1.tar.bz2をFreeBSD 9.1でコンパイルすると、sh configureの後、makeで、
ruby-2.2.1/vm_dump.c:738: undefined reference to `procstat_getvmmap'
となります。
vm_dump.cの#ifdef HAVE_LIBPROCSTATを#if 0に書き換えるとコンパイルできます。
configureを見ると、procstat_open_sysctl()のチェックによりlibprocstatを判定していますが、FreeBSD 9.1ではこの関数は存在し、かつprocstat_getvmmapは存在しないため、正しくconfigureできていないことになると思います。
私自身がconfigureに詳しければPullReqを出せるのですが、申し訳ありません。
(ところでfiddleのlibffiが-fPICを付けられていないのでビルドに失敗する問題が別にあるのですが、そちらはとりあえず2.2.2まで待ってみます。)
--
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/