[#68478] Looking for MRI projects for Ruby Google Summer of Code 2015 — Tony Arcieri <bascule@...>
Hi ruby-core,
10 messages
2015/03/10
[#68480] Re: Looking for MRI projects for Ruby Google Summer of Code 2015
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2015/03/10
I have.
[#68549] Re: Looking for MRI projects for Ruby Google Summer of Code 2015
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2015/03/17
I sent several ideas on previous, mail, but they are seems rejected?
[#68493] [Ruby trunk - Feature #10532] [PATCH] accept_nonblock supports "exception: false" — nobu@...
Issue #10532 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.
5 messages
2015/03/11
[#68503] Re: [Ruby trunk - Feature #10532] [PATCH] accept_nonblock supports "exception: false"
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2015/03/12
Committed as r49948.
[#68504] Re: [Ruby trunk - Feature #10532] [PATCH] accept_nonblock supports "exception: false"
— Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...>
2015/03/12
On 2015/03/12 12:08, Eric Wong wrote:
[#68506] Seven stacks (and two questions) — Jakub Trzebiatowski <jaktrze1@...>
The Ruby Hacking Guide says that Ruby has窶ヲ seven stacks. Is it an implementation choice (and it could be implemented with one stack), or is there really a need for seven logical stacks? For example, Lua has one stack, and still closures with upvalues are totally possible (it窶冱 like Ruby窶冱 blocks that can reference local variables of their enclosing method, but it works for any function with any upvalues).
5 messages
2015/03/12
[#68520] Possible regression in 2.1 and 2.2 in binding when combined with delegate? — Joe Swatosh <joe.swatosh@...>
# The following code
3 messages
2015/03/14
[#68604] GSOC project Cross-thread Fiber support — surya pratap singh raghuvanshi <oshosurya@...>
- *hi i am a third year computer science student interested in working
6 messages
2015/03/22
[#68606] Re: GSOC project Cross-thread Fiber support
— Tony Arcieri <bascule@...>
2015/03/22
Hi Surya,
[#68619] Re: GSOC project Cross-thread Fiber support
— surya pratap singh raghuvanshi <oshosurya@...>
2015/03/23
hi tony,
[ruby-core:68377] [Ruby trunk - Feature #10927] [Open] [PATCH] Add default empty string to string replacements
From:
zimbatm@...
Date:
2015-03-02 16:26:41 UTC
List:
ruby-core #68377
Issue #10927 has been reported by zimba tm.
----------------------------------------
Feature #10927: [PATCH] Add default empty string to string replacements
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/10927
* Author: zimba tm
* Status: Open
* Priority: Normal
* Assignee:
----------------------------------------
Hi ruby devs !
A common case for string substitution is to just remove the found items. This patch changes the `String#[g]sub[!]` methods to allow that.
Old usages:
"foo".sub("o", "") #=> "fo"
"foo".gsub("o", "") #=> "f"
New usages:
"foo".sub("o") #=> "fo"
"foo".gsub("o") #=> "f"
Applies to the bang versions as well.
This commit changes the return values of String#gsub! call with a single
argument and no block from an Enumerator to a String. The previous usage
would return an Enumerator containing each match, which is not a string
substitution. A suitable replacement should nonetheless be found before
merging this commit.
Before:
"foo".gsub("o") #=> #<Enumerator: "foo":gsub("o")>
Replacement:
???
---Files--------------------------------
0001-Add-a-default-empty-string-to-string-replacements.patch (2.2 KB)
--
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/