[#68478] Looking for MRI projects for Ruby Google Summer of Code 2015 — Tony Arcieri <bascule@...>
Hi ruby-core,
10 messages
2015/03/10
[#68480] Re: Looking for MRI projects for Ruby Google Summer of Code 2015
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2015/03/10
I have.
[#68549] Re: Looking for MRI projects for Ruby Google Summer of Code 2015
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2015/03/17
I sent several ideas on previous, mail, but they are seems rejected?
[#68493] [Ruby trunk - Feature #10532] [PATCH] accept_nonblock supports "exception: false" — nobu@...
Issue #10532 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.
5 messages
2015/03/11
[#68503] Re: [Ruby trunk - Feature #10532] [PATCH] accept_nonblock supports "exception: false"
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2015/03/12
Committed as r49948.
[#68504] Re: [Ruby trunk - Feature #10532] [PATCH] accept_nonblock supports "exception: false"
— Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...>
2015/03/12
On 2015/03/12 12:08, Eric Wong wrote:
[#68506] Seven stacks (and two questions) — Jakub Trzebiatowski <jaktrze1@...>
The Ruby Hacking Guide says that Ruby has窶ヲ seven stacks. Is it an implementation choice (and it could be implemented with one stack), or is there really a need for seven logical stacks? For example, Lua has one stack, and still closures with upvalues are totally possible (it窶冱 like Ruby窶冱 blocks that can reference local variables of their enclosing method, but it works for any function with any upvalues).
5 messages
2015/03/12
[#68520] Possible regression in 2.1 and 2.2 in binding when combined with delegate? — Joe Swatosh <joe.swatosh@...>
# The following code
3 messages
2015/03/14
[#68604] GSOC project Cross-thread Fiber support — surya pratap singh raghuvanshi <oshosurya@...>
- *hi i am a third year computer science student interested in working
6 messages
2015/03/22
[#68606] Re: GSOC project Cross-thread Fiber support
— Tony Arcieri <bascule@...>
2015/03/22
Hi Surya,
[#68619] Re: GSOC project Cross-thread Fiber support
— surya pratap singh raghuvanshi <oshosurya@...>
2015/03/23
hi tony,
[ruby-core:68544] [Ruby trunk - Bug #10765] Module#remove_method remove refined method entry.
From:
nagachika00@...
Date:
2015-03-17 16:13:07 UTC
List:
ruby-core #68544
Issue #10765 has been updated by Tomoyuki Chikanaga.
Backport changed from 2.0.0: DONE, 2.1: REQUIRED, 2.2: DONE to 2.0.0: DONE, 2.1: DONE, 2.2: DONE
Backported into `ruby_2_1` branch at r49992.
----------------------------------------
Bug #10765: Module#remove_method remove refined method entry.
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/10765#change-51863
* Author: Seiei Higa
* Status: Closed
* Priority: Normal
* Assignee: Shugo Maeda
* ruby -v: ruby 2.3.0dev (2015-01-21 trunk 49326) [x86_64-darwin14]
* Backport: 2.0.0: DONE, 2.1: DONE, 2.2: DONE
----------------------------------------
`Module#remove_method` should raise a `NameError`
if method is not defined in refined class, such as [`undef`](https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/8966).
But if method is defined in refined class, `Module#remove_method` should keep refined method and remove original method.
I confirmed by following examples in ruby-trunk, 2.2.0, 2.1.5, 2.0.0-p598
``` ruby
class C
def foo
"C#foo"
end
end
module RefinementBug
refine C do
def foo
"RefinementBug#foo"
end
end
end
using RefinementBug
class C
remove_method :foo
end
puts C.new.foo
# expected:
# RefinementBug#foo
#
# actual:
# bug.rb:21:in `<main>': undefined method `foo' for #<C:0x007f9e5c087b48> (NoMethodError)
```
``` ruby
class C
end
module RefinementBug
refine C do
def foo
end
end
end
using RefinementBug
class C
remove_method :foo
end
# expected:
# bug2.rb:14:in `remove_method': method `foo' not defined in C (NameError)
# from bug2.rb:14:in `<class:C>'
# from bug2.rb:13:in `<main>'
#
# actual:
# # => nothing raised.
```
---Files--------------------------------
bug2.rb (327 Bytes)
bug.rb (342 Bytes)
0001-vm_method.c-fix-remove-refined-method.patch (2.68 KB)
--
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/