[#68478] Looking for MRI projects for Ruby Google Summer of Code 2015 — Tony Arcieri <bascule@...>
Hi ruby-core,
10 messages
2015/03/10
[#68480] Re: Looking for MRI projects for Ruby Google Summer of Code 2015
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2015/03/10
I have.
[#68549] Re: Looking for MRI projects for Ruby Google Summer of Code 2015
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2015/03/17
I sent several ideas on previous, mail, but they are seems rejected?
[#68493] [Ruby trunk - Feature #10532] [PATCH] accept_nonblock supports "exception: false" — nobu@...
Issue #10532 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.
5 messages
2015/03/11
[#68503] Re: [Ruby trunk - Feature #10532] [PATCH] accept_nonblock supports "exception: false"
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2015/03/12
Committed as r49948.
[#68504] Re: [Ruby trunk - Feature #10532] [PATCH] accept_nonblock supports "exception: false"
— Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...>
2015/03/12
On 2015/03/12 12:08, Eric Wong wrote:
[#68506] Seven stacks (and two questions) — Jakub Trzebiatowski <jaktrze1@...>
The Ruby Hacking Guide says that Ruby has=E2=80=A6 seven stacks. Is it =
5 messages
2015/03/12
[#68520] Possible regression in 2.1 and 2.2 in binding when combined with delegate? — Joe Swatosh <joe.swatosh@...>
# The following code
3 messages
2015/03/14
[#68604] GSOC project Cross-thread Fiber support — surya pratap singh raghuvanshi <oshosurya@...>
- *hi i am a third year computer science student interested in working
6 messages
2015/03/22
[#68606] Re: GSOC project Cross-thread Fiber support
— Tony Arcieri <bascule@...>
2015/03/22
Hi Surya,
[#68619] Re: GSOC project Cross-thread Fiber support
— surya pratap singh raghuvanshi <oshosurya@...>
2015/03/23
hi tony,
[ruby-core:68638] [Ruby trunk - Bug #10999] [PERF] bm_hash_aref_flo.rb
From:
ko1@...
Date:
2015-03-25 15:27:10 UTC
List:
ruby-core #68638
Issue #10999 has been updated by Koichi Sasada. Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote: > It is not a realistic benchmark, that integer parts are all different. Why? I think it is possible case (I agree not so much case). Maybe it is issue on Float#hash code. Adding different (more possible) case is nice, but modifying benchmark and solving issue is not good way. Of course, if benchmark has a bug (not intended behavior), it should be solved. ---------------------------------------- Bug #10999: [PERF] bm_hash_aref_flo.rb https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/10999#change-51938 * Author: Guo Xiang Tan * Status: Closed * Priority: Normal * Assignee: Nobuyoshi Nakada * ruby -v: 2.3.0dev (2015-03-18 trunk 49999) [x86_64-linux] * Backport: 2.0.0: DONTNEED, 2.1: DONTNEED, 2.2: REQUIRED ---------------------------------------- Before: 0.066s After [3bcf9fb53e4b9efabb15a3091fddfb68e5b6fbbe](https://github.com/ruby/ruby/commit/3bcf9fb): 0.094 To view the full graph, please visit http://rubybench.org/ruby/ruby/commits?result_type=hash_aref_flo&display_count=200. To issue is meant to highlight what we're seeing at RubyBench.org, feel free to close this issue if the trade offs were intended. -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/