[#68478] Looking for MRI projects for Ruby Google Summer of Code 2015 — Tony Arcieri <bascule@...>
Hi ruby-core,
10 messages
2015/03/10
[#68480] Re: Looking for MRI projects for Ruby Google Summer of Code 2015
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2015/03/10
I have.
[#68549] Re: Looking for MRI projects for Ruby Google Summer of Code 2015
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2015/03/17
I sent several ideas on previous, mail, but they are seems rejected?
[#68493] [Ruby trunk - Feature #10532] [PATCH] accept_nonblock supports "exception: false" — nobu@...
Issue #10532 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.
5 messages
2015/03/11
[#68503] Re: [Ruby trunk - Feature #10532] [PATCH] accept_nonblock supports "exception: false"
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2015/03/12
Committed as r49948.
[#68504] Re: [Ruby trunk - Feature #10532] [PATCH] accept_nonblock supports "exception: false"
— Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...>
2015/03/12
On 2015/03/12 12:08, Eric Wong wrote:
[#68506] Seven stacks (and two questions) — Jakub Trzebiatowski <jaktrze1@...>
The Ruby Hacking Guide says that Ruby has窶ヲ seven stacks. Is it an implementation choice (and it could be implemented with one stack), or is there really a need for seven logical stacks? For example, Lua has one stack, and still closures with upvalues are totally possible (it窶冱 like Ruby窶冱 blocks that can reference local variables of their enclosing method, but it works for any function with any upvalues).
5 messages
2015/03/12
[#68520] Possible regression in 2.1 and 2.2 in binding when combined with delegate? — Joe Swatosh <joe.swatosh@...>
# The following code
3 messages
2015/03/14
[#68604] GSOC project Cross-thread Fiber support — surya pratap singh raghuvanshi <oshosurya@...>
- *hi i am a third year computer science student interested in working
6 messages
2015/03/22
[#68606] Re: GSOC project Cross-thread Fiber support
— Tony Arcieri <bascule@...>
2015/03/22
Hi Surya,
[#68619] Re: GSOC project Cross-thread Fiber support
— surya pratap singh raghuvanshi <oshosurya@...>
2015/03/23
hi tony,
[ruby-core:68433] [Ruby trunk - Bug #10941] SIGSEGV caused by Rake on Windows
From:
usa@...
Date:
2015-03-05 16:44:00 UTC
List:
ruby-core #68433
Issue #10941 has been updated by Usaku NAKAMURA.
Backport changed from 2.0.0: DONTNEED, 2.1: REQUIRED, 2.2: REQUIRED to 2.0.0: DONTNEED, 2.1: DONTNEED, 2.2: REQUIRED
My rake batchfile of 2.1.5 ran trunk ruby...
There is no problem in 2.1.5.
I succeeded to reproduce this more simple case:
~~~
C:\> ruby -e "" test\test_*.rb
~~~
So, rake is not needed.
This is a problem of commandline grobbing processing.
----------------------------------------
Bug #10941: SIGSEGV caused by Rake on Windows
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/10941#change-51779
* Author: Daniel Berger
* Status: Open
* Priority: Normal
* Assignee:
* ruby -v: ruby 2.2.1p85 (2015-02-26 revision 49769) [i386-mswin32_120]
* Backport: 2.0.0: DONTNEED, 2.1: DONTNEED, 2.2: REQUIRED
----------------------------------------
Ruby 2.2.1
Windows 7
Compiled with VS 2013
I'm getting a segfault when trying to run the default (test) task for a project called file-find:
https://github.com/djberg96/file-find
It's a fairly simple project, and the relevant tasks in the Rakefile look like this:
CLEAN.include("**/*.gem", "**/*.rbc", "**/link*")
Rake::TestTask.new do |t|
task :test => 'clean'
t.warning = true
t.verbose = true
end
task :default => :test
When I step through the rake code, it seems to choke here
C:/Ruby22VC/lib/ruby/2.2.0/rake/task.rb:172: @lock.synchronize do
I'm not sure how to narrow it down any further. Please let me know if there's any more information I can provide.
--
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/