[#68478] Looking for MRI projects for Ruby Google Summer of Code 2015 — Tony Arcieri <bascule@...>
Hi ruby-core,
10 messages
2015/03/10
[#68480] Re: Looking for MRI projects for Ruby Google Summer of Code 2015
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2015/03/10
I have.
[#68549] Re: Looking for MRI projects for Ruby Google Summer of Code 2015
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2015/03/17
I sent several ideas on previous, mail, but they are seems rejected?
[#68493] [Ruby trunk - Feature #10532] [PATCH] accept_nonblock supports "exception: false" — nobu@...
Issue #10532 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.
5 messages
2015/03/11
[#68503] Re: [Ruby trunk - Feature #10532] [PATCH] accept_nonblock supports "exception: false"
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2015/03/12
Committed as r49948.
[#68504] Re: [Ruby trunk - Feature #10532] [PATCH] accept_nonblock supports "exception: false"
— Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...>
2015/03/12
On 2015/03/12 12:08, Eric Wong wrote:
[#68506] Seven stacks (and two questions) — Jakub Trzebiatowski <jaktrze1@...>
The Ruby Hacking Guide says that Ruby has窶ヲ seven stacks. Is it an implementation choice (and it could be implemented with one stack), or is there really a need for seven logical stacks? For example, Lua has one stack, and still closures with upvalues are totally possible (it窶冱 like Ruby窶冱 blocks that can reference local variables of their enclosing method, but it works for any function with any upvalues).
5 messages
2015/03/12
[#68520] Possible regression in 2.1 and 2.2 in binding when combined with delegate? — Joe Swatosh <joe.swatosh@...>
# The following code
3 messages
2015/03/14
[#68604] GSOC project Cross-thread Fiber support — surya pratap singh raghuvanshi <oshosurya@...>
- *hi i am a third year computer science student interested in working
6 messages
2015/03/22
[#68606] Re: GSOC project Cross-thread Fiber support
— Tony Arcieri <bascule@...>
2015/03/22
Hi Surya,
[#68619] Re: GSOC project Cross-thread Fiber support
— surya pratap singh raghuvanshi <oshosurya@...>
2015/03/23
hi tony,
[ruby-core:68564] [Ruby trunk - Bug #10985] [Open] Ruby 2.2 respond_to_missing?/method_missing/Object#method is not detecting properly
From:
michael.j.herold+ruby@...
Date:
2015-03-19 20:17:36 UTC
List:
ruby-core #68564
Issue #10985 has been reported by Michael Herold.
----------------------------------------
Bug #10985: Ruby 2.2 respond_to_missing?/method_missing/Object#method is not detecting properly
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/10985
* Author: Michael Herold
* Status: Open
* Priority: Normal
* Assignee:
* ruby -v: 2.2.1p85
* Backport: 2.0.0: UNKNOWN, 2.1: UNKNOWN, 2.2: UNKNOWN
----------------------------------------
I'm one of the maintainers of the hashie gem. We had some reports that one of our specs started failing with Ruby 2.2 (and it was failing in ruby-head before then, but no one noticed), where `Object#method` was not picking up a `respond_to_missing?`/`method_missing` combo for our dynamic setters. This only occurs when we are dynamically constructing the method name from a string.
I have isolated the issue out into a tiny sample project that shows the issue. You can see that sample [on Github][regression_test]. That repository is set up to have Travis run on Ruby 2.1.5, 2.2.0, 2.2.1, and ruby-head to show that the issue is introduced in the 2.2 line.
I'm having trouble isolating the issue down at the C level, but from a Ruby level, it seems that dynamically constructed symbols aren't the same as explicitly constructed (i.e. fully typed out) symbols. Using the syntax from my little test repository:
```ruby
widget = Widget.new
widget.method(:abc=) #=> This is found
widget.method("abc=") #=> This is found because it has previously been accessed via a symbol
widget.method("xyz=") #=> This is NOT found
widget.method(:xyz=) #=> This is found
widget.method("xyz=") #=> Now this is found because it was previously accessed via a symbol
```
Because of that behavior, it makes me think that something is happening with the conversion of the argument to a symbol, but that could be way off.
Please let me know if the explanation is vague. I'm happy to provide any more information that you would find helpful.
[regression_test]: https://github.com/michaelherold/method_missing_regression
--
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/