[#68478] Looking for MRI projects for Ruby Google Summer of Code 2015 — Tony Arcieri <bascule@...>
Hi ruby-core,
10 messages
2015/03/10
[#68480] Re: Looking for MRI projects for Ruby Google Summer of Code 2015
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2015/03/10
I have.
[#68549] Re: Looking for MRI projects for Ruby Google Summer of Code 2015
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2015/03/17
I sent several ideas on previous, mail, but they are seems rejected?
[#68493] [Ruby trunk - Feature #10532] [PATCH] accept_nonblock supports "exception: false" — nobu@...
Issue #10532 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.
5 messages
2015/03/11
[#68503] Re: [Ruby trunk - Feature #10532] [PATCH] accept_nonblock supports "exception: false"
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2015/03/12
Committed as r49948.
[#68504] Re: [Ruby trunk - Feature #10532] [PATCH] accept_nonblock supports "exception: false"
— Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...>
2015/03/12
On 2015/03/12 12:08, Eric Wong wrote:
[#68506] Seven stacks (and two questions) — Jakub Trzebiatowski <jaktrze1@...>
The Ruby Hacking Guide says that Ruby has窶ヲ seven stacks. Is it an implementation choice (and it could be implemented with one stack), or is there really a need for seven logical stacks? For example, Lua has one stack, and still closures with upvalues are totally possible (it窶冱 like Ruby窶冱 blocks that can reference local variables of their enclosing method, but it works for any function with any upvalues).
5 messages
2015/03/12
[#68520] Possible regression in 2.1 and 2.2 in binding when combined with delegate? — Joe Swatosh <joe.swatosh@...>
# The following code
3 messages
2015/03/14
[#68604] GSOC project Cross-thread Fiber support — surya pratap singh raghuvanshi <oshosurya@...>
- *hi i am a third year computer science student interested in working
6 messages
2015/03/22
[#68606] Re: GSOC project Cross-thread Fiber support
— Tony Arcieri <bascule@...>
2015/03/22
Hi Surya,
[#68619] Re: GSOC project Cross-thread Fiber support
— surya pratap singh raghuvanshi <oshosurya@...>
2015/03/23
hi tony,
[ruby-core:68435] [Ruby trunk - Misc #10755] Use rb_define_alias instead of rb_define_method for rb_cHash
From:
mail@...
Date:
2015-03-06 07:01:04 UTC
List:
ruby-core #68435
Issue #10755 has been updated by gogo tanaka. Hi! As https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/756/, it can make users a little bit confused. Even some of them can think it's a mistake of documentation. so I wanna commit this patch(using_rb_define_method_for_rbHash.patch), is there any problem? ---------------------------------------- Misc #10755: Use rb_define_alias instead of rb_define_method for rb_cHash https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/10755#change-51783 * Author: gogo tanaka * Status: Open * Priority: Low * Assignee: ---------------------------------------- Hi, there. The main reason for using `rb_define_alias` is generating more prefer Document and making code more readable. Is there any reason `rb_define_method` is prefered to `rb_define_alias`? If so, please let me know :) If not so, I'm gonna do same thing for other part of code. I've sorted some methods in terms of `rb_define_alias` being very after original. ---Files-------------------------------- using_rb_define_method_for_rbHash.patch (3.19 KB) -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/