[#3861] super — ts <decoux@...>
[#3862] Marshal.dump'ing OpenStruct objects — Mauricio Fern疣dez <batsman.geo@...>
Hi,
[#3881] mkdir, mkdir_p in FileUtils and mode — Florian Frank <flori@...>
Hello,
[#3907] Obtaining mode information on an IO object — Jos Backus <jos@...>
The attached patch implements IO#mode. This method returns the mode the IO
Hi,
On Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 09:25:13AM +0900, nobu.nokada@softhome.net wrote:
Jos Backus wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Dec 09, 2004 at 10:47:48AM +0900, nobu.nokada@softhome.net wrote:
On Thu, Dec 09, 2004 at 02:40:33PM +0900, James Britt wrote:
[#3914] Pathname needs a makeover — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...>
Hi all,
[#3922] Incorrect escaping in strings produced by String::inspect — noreply@...
Bugs item #1173, was opened at 2004-12-08 17:35
[#3966] unknown node type 0 — Andrew Walrond <andrew@...>
I still get this happening a lot with my Rubyx linux ruby script.
This is a long standing bug in Ruby, and has been reported hundreds of times
Hi,
[#3975] Patches to test/unit — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>
I believe these are the minimal patches needed to make it possible to
[#3982] Win32: rb_sys_fail() - errno == 0 — Florian Gro<florgro@...>
Moin!
[#4000] 1.8.2 preview4 — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
Hello,
[#4009] cgi.rb -- more GET/POST stuff — mde@...26.com
First of all, I think it would be great, as Eustaquio suggests, to
GETs and POSTs are defined to be fairly different actions. I'd read
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Francis Hwang wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
First of all, the entire discussion of when GET is appropriate
mde@state26.com wrote:
[#4027] Allowing custom number literal suffixes? — Florian Gro<florgro@...>
Moin!
Hi,
Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
I'm not sure I would advocate making Ruby's grammar even more
>
Brent Roman wrote:
> Brent Roman wrote:
Brent Roman wrote:
> Florian Gross wrote:
Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
[#4033] Garbage collection trouble — Christian Neukirchen <chneukirchen@...>
Hello,
>>>>> "C" == Christian Neukirchen <chneukirchen@gmail.com> writes:
ts <decoux@moulon.inra.fr> writes:
>>>>> "C" == Christian Neukirchen <chneukirchen@gmail.com> writes:
[#4040] Extensions, Internal — Jgen Mangler <juergen.mangler@...>
Hi,
Re: Extensions, Internal
myObj.text.gsub!(/a/,"b") will not alter the string returned by #text,
because it returns a duplicated value from inside an extension. Sorry i
can't explain it better.
think of something like:
VALUE rbxs_node_text_get(VALUE self) {
rbxs_node *prbxs;
Data_Get_Struct(self, rbxs, prbxs);
return(rb_str_new2(CONVERT_FROM_SOME_STRING_FORMAT(prbxs->node->content)));
}
VALUE rbxs_node_text_set(VALUE self, VALUE text) {
rbxs_node *prbxs;
Data_Get_Struct(self, rbxs, prbxs);
setSomeStrangeTextFormat(prbxs->node->content,STR2CSTR(text));
}
when calling #gsub! on something that rbxs_node_text_get returns, it
just don't alters the object it is called on, because it can't. Content
can only be set through setSomeStrangeTextFormat
Maybe i missed something important, but after discussing a bit on
#ruby-lang, someone came up with
"you could also create a wrapper string which has .gsub! and so on
replaced with special versions that go through the setter"
which seemed somehow ... uncool to me.
I though that maybe I can tell a string, what to call to deliver
something back (in this case rbxs_node_text_set). A callback function.
(Described in the first detail)
Sorry for my bad english.
Jgen
Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In message "Re: Extensions, Internal"
> on Tue, 28 Dec 2004 14:54:50 +0900, Jgen Mangler <juergen.mangler@univie.ac.at> writes:
>
> |rb_define_method(cSimpleNode, "text", rbxs_node_text_get, 0);
> |rb_define_method(cSimpleNode, "text=", rbxs_node_text_set, 1);
> |
> |I've to return duplicates of the string, because the string format is
> |incompatible/the string can only be set by calling a function. So a
> |gsub! will not work as expected.
>
> I'm afraid I don't understand what you want. What do you expect for a
> gsub! to work?
>
> matz.
>
>