[#3861] super — ts <decoux@...>
[#3862] Marshal.dump'ing OpenStruct objects — Mauricio Fern疣dez <batsman.geo@...>
Hi,
[#3881] mkdir, mkdir_p in FileUtils and mode — Florian Frank <flori@...>
Hello,
[#3907] Obtaining mode information on an IO object — Jos Backus <jos@...>
The attached patch implements IO#mode. This method returns the mode the IO
Hi,
On Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 09:25:13AM +0900, nobu.nokada@softhome.net wrote:
Jos Backus wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Dec 09, 2004 at 10:47:48AM +0900, nobu.nokada@softhome.net wrote:
On Thu, Dec 09, 2004 at 02:40:33PM +0900, James Britt wrote:
[#3914] Pathname needs a makeover — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...>
Hi all,
[#3922] Incorrect escaping in strings produced by String::inspect — noreply@...
Bugs item #1173, was opened at 2004-12-08 17:35
[#3966] unknown node type 0 — Andrew Walrond <andrew@...>
I still get this happening a lot with my Rubyx linux ruby script.
This is a long standing bug in Ruby, and has been reported hundreds of times
Hi,
[#3975] Patches to test/unit — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>
I believe these are the minimal patches needed to make it possible to
[#3982] Win32: rb_sys_fail() - errno == 0 — Florian Gro<florgro@...>
Moin!
[#4000] 1.8.2 preview4 — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
Hello,
[#4009] cgi.rb -- more GET/POST stuff — mde@...26.com
First of all, I think it would be great, as Eustaquio suggests, to
GETs and POSTs are defined to be fairly different actions. I'd read
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Francis Hwang wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
First of all, the entire discussion of when GET is appropriate
mde@state26.com wrote:
[#4027] Allowing custom number literal suffixes? — Florian Gro<florgro@...>
Moin!
Hi,
Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
I'm not sure I would advocate making Ruby's grammar even more
>
Brent Roman wrote:
> Brent Roman wrote:
Brent Roman wrote:
> Florian Gross wrote:
Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
[#4033] Garbage collection trouble — Christian Neukirchen <chneukirchen@...>
Hello,
>>>>> "C" == Christian Neukirchen <chneukirchen@gmail.com> writes:
ts <decoux@moulon.inra.fr> writes:
>>>>> "C" == Christian Neukirchen <chneukirchen@gmail.com> writes:
[#4040] Extensions, Internal — Jgen Mangler <juergen.mangler@...>
Hi,
Re: [PATCH] Marshal.dump'ing OpenStruct objects
Hi,
At Thu, 2 Dec 2004 09:38:31 +0900,
Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote in [ruby-core:03863]:
> |I think this allows one to dump OpenStruct objects, and addresses the
> |data compatibility issue:
>
> I have recently restored the old behavior, but this one seems
> superior. I will take this.
This change makes no sense as for the compatibility.
$ cvs up -A lib/ostruct.rb
U lib/ostruct.rb
$ ./ruby -rostruct -e 'o=OpenStruct.new;o.foo=1;print Marshal.dump(o)' > ostruct.dump
$ od -tx1z ostruct.dump
0000000 04 08 65 3a 1a 4f 70 65 6e 53 74 72 75 63 74 3a >..e:.OpenStruct:<
0000020 3a 4d 61 72 73 68 61 6c 65 72 55 3a 0f 4f 70 65 >:MarshalerU:.Ope<
0000040 6e 53 74 72 75 63 74 6f 3b 06 06 3a 0b 40 74 61 >nStructo;..:.@ta<
0000060 62 6c 65 7b 06 3a 08 66 6f 6f 69 06 >ble{.:.fooi.<
0000074
$ cvs up -r1.11 lib/ostruct.rb
U lib/ostruct.rb
$ ./ruby -rostruct -e 'p Marshal.load(STDIN)' < ostruct.dump
-e:1:in `load': undefined class/module OpenStruct::Marshaler (ArgumentError)
from -e:1
It is same as simply adding marshal_dump/marhsal_load.
--
Nobu Nakada