ruby-core

Mailing Lists

ruby-list (For Ruby users, JA) ruby-dev (For Ruby developers, JA) ruby-core (For Ruby developers, EN) ruby-talk (For Ruby users, EN)
2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

[#3861] super — ts <decoux@...>

9 messages 2004/12/01
[#3872] Re: [1.9, 1.8] super — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2004/12/03

Hi,
[#3874] Re: [1.9, 1.8] super — ts <decoux@...> 2004/12/03

>>>>> "Y" == Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> writes:
[#3876] Re: [1.9, 1.8] super — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2004/12/03

Hi,
[#3877] Re: [1.9, 1.8] super — ts <decoux@...> 2004/12/03

>>>>> "Y" == Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> writes:
[#3878] Re: [1.9, 1.8] super — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2004/12/03

Hi,
[#3879] Re: [1.9, 1.8] super — Shugo Maeda <shugo@...> 2004/12/03

Hi,
[#3880] Re: [1.9, 1.8] super — ts <decoux@...> 2004/12/03

>>>>> "S" == Shugo Maeda <shugo@ruby-lang.org> writes:
[#3882] Re: [1.9, 1.8] super — Shugo Maeda <shugo@...> 2004/12/03

Hi,

[#3862] Marshal.dump'ing OpenStruct objects — Mauricio Fern疣dez <batsman.geo@...>

6 messages 2004/12/01
[#3863] Re: [PATCH] Marshal.dump'ing OpenStruct objects — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2004/12/02

Hi,
[#3868] Re: [PATCH] Marshal.dump'ing OpenStruct objects — nobu.nokada@... 2004/12/03

Hi,
[#3873] Re: [PATCH] Marshal.dump'ing OpenStruct objects — Mauricio Fern疣dez <batsman.geo@...> 2004/12/03

On Fri, Dec 03, 2004 at 10:21:21AM +0900, nobu.nokada@softhome.net wrote:
[#3875] Re: [PATCH] Marshal.dump'ing OpenStruct objects — "trans. (T. Onoma)" <transami@...> 2004/12/03

On Friday 03 December 2004 03:35 am, Mauricio Fern叩ndez wrote:
[#3871] Re: [PATCH] Marshal.dump'ing OpenStruct objects — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2004/12/03

Hi,

[#3866] x86_64 segfault on stack overflow — noreply@...

Bugs item #1147, was opened at 2004-12-02 21:34

2 messages 2004/12/02
[#3867] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-1147 ] x86_64 segfault on stack overflow — Charles Mills <cmills@...> 2004/12/02

On Dec 2, 2004, at 12:35 PM, noreply@rubyforge.org wrote:

[#3869] should fatal class be "Fatal"? — Michael Neumann <mneumann@...>

Hi,

4 messages 2004/12/03
[#3870] Re: should fatal class be "Fatal"? — nobu.nokada@... 2004/12/03

Hi,
[#3883] Re: should fatal class be "Fatal"? — Florian Gro<florgro@...> 2004/12/03

nobu.nokada@softhome.net wrote:
[#3891] Re: should fatal class be "Fatal"? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2004/12/04

Hi,

[#3881] mkdir, mkdir_p in FileUtils and mode — Florian Frank <flori@...>

Hello,

6 messages 2004/12/03
[#3887] Re: mkdir, mkdir_p in FileUtils and mode — Minero Aoki <aamine@...> 2004/12/04

Hi,
[#3888] Re: mkdir, mkdir_p in FileUtils and mode — Florian Frank <flori@...> 2004/12/04

Minero Aoki wrote:
[#3889] Re: mkdir, mkdir_p in FileUtils and mode — Minero Aoki <aamine@...> 2004/12/04

Hi,
[#3890] Re: mkdir, mkdir_p in FileUtils and mode — Florian Frank <flori@...> 2004/12/04

Hi!
[#3892] Re: mkdir, mkdir_p in FileUtils and mode — URABE Shyouhei <s-urabe@...> 2004/12/04

Hi,

[#3884] Browsing the CVS tree? — Francis Hwang <sera@...>

Hi,

3 messages 2004/12/04
[#3885] Re: Browsing the CVS tree? — "daz" <dooby@...10.karoo.co.uk> 2004/12/04

[#3886] Re: Browsing the CVS tree? — Francis Hwang <sera@...> 2004/12/04

Wonderful. Thanks!

[#3893] Infinite loop in gsub — noreply@...

Bugs item #1156, was opened at 2004-12-04 20:53

3 messages 2004/12/04
[#3895] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-1156 ] Infinite loop in gsub — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2004/12/05

Hi --
[#3894] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-1156 ] Infinite loop in gsub — ts <decoux@...> 2004/12/05

>>>>> "n" == noreply <noreply@rubyforge.org> writes:

[#3896] bug in debug's help — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>

<506> cvs diff -du lib/debug.rb

4 messages 2004/12/05
[#3897] Re: bug in debug's help — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...> 2004/12/05

Your patch implies that
[#3898] Re: bug in debug's help — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2004/12/06

Hi,
[#3906] Re: bug in debug's help — Ryan Davis <ryand@...> 2004/12/06

[#3899] Rexml bug report — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>

Hi,

3 messages 2004/12/06
[#3904] Re: Rexml bug report — "Sean E. Russell" <ser@...> 2004/12/06

On Sunday 05 December 2004 19:25, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#3902] Re: Rexml bug report — "Sean E. Russell" <ser@...> 2004/12/06

On Sunday 05 December 2004 19:25, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#3900] The latest 1.8.2 cvs has uncompilable is_socket on unix — noreply@...

Bugs item #1164, was opened at 2004-12-06 14:10

2 messages 2004/12/06
[#3901] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-1164 ] The latest 1.8.2 cvs has uncompilable is_socket on unix — "U.Nakamura" <usa@...> 2004/12/06

Hello,

[#3903] The latest cvs HEAD does not link on solaris — noreply@...

Bugs item #1165, was opened at 2004-12-06 15:40

2 messages 2004/12/06
[#3905] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-1165 ] The latest cvs HEAD does not link on solaris — Tanaka Akira <akr@...17n.org> 2004/12/06

In article <200412061340.iB6DeMsH021529@rubyforge.org>,

[#3907] Obtaining mode information on an IO object — Jos Backus <jos@...>

The attached patch implements IO#mode. This method returns the mode the IO

17 messages 2004/12/06
[#3909] Re: [patch] Obtaining mode information on an IO object — nobu.nokada@... 2004/12/07

Hi,
[#3910] Re: [patch] Obtaining mode information on an IO object — Jos Backus <jos@...> 2004/12/07

On Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 09:25:13AM +0900, nobu.nokada@softhome.net wrote:
[#3925] Re: [patch] Obtaining mode information on an IO object — James Britt <ruby@...> 2004/12/09

Jos Backus wrote:
[#3926] Re: [patch] Obtaining mode information on an IO object — Jos Backus <jos@...> 2004/12/09

On Thu, Dec 09, 2004 at 10:01:53AM +0900, James Britt wrote:
[#3927] Re: [patch] Obtaining mode information on an IO object — nobu.nokada@... 2004/12/09

Hi,
[#3931] Re: [patch] Obtaining mode information on an IO object — Jos Backus <jos@...> 2004/12/09

On Thu, Dec 09, 2004 at 10:47:48AM +0900, nobu.nokada@softhome.net wrote:
[#3932] Re: [patch] Obtaining mode information on an IO object — James Britt <ruby@...> 2004/12/09

[#3933] Re: [patch] Obtaining mode information on an IO object — Jos Backus <jos@...> 2004/12/09

On Thu, Dec 09, 2004 at 02:40:33PM +0900, James Britt wrote:
[#3934] Re: [patch] Obtaining mode information on an IO object — nobu.nokada@... 2004/12/09

Hi,
[#3935] Re: [patch] Obtaining mode information on an IO object — Austin Ziegler <halostatue@...> 2004/12/09

On Thu, 9 Dec 2004 16:42:55 +0900, nobu.nokada@softhome.net
[#3937] Re: [patch] Obtaining mode information on an IO object — Robert McGovern <robert.mcgovern@...> 2004/12/09

> > Or, how about separating them so that accmode will return
[#3938] Re: [patch] Obtaining mode information on an IO object — Jos Backus <jos@...> 2004/12/09

On Thu, Dec 09, 2004 at 04:42:55PM +0900, nobu.nokada@softhome.net wrote:
[#3955] Re: [patch] Obtaining mode information on an IO object — Florian Frank <flori@...> 2004/12/12

Hi,
[#3956] Re: [patch] Obtaining mode information on an IO object — Jos Backus <jos@...> 2004/12/12

On Mon, Dec 13, 2004 at 03:20:18AM +0900, Florian Frank wrote:
[#3911] Re: [patch] Obtaining mode information on an IO object — nobu.nokada@... 2004/12/07

Hi,
[#3913] Re: [patch] Obtaining mode information on an IO object — Jos Backus <jos@...> 2004/12/07

On Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 11:37:39AM +0900, nobu.nokada@softhome.net wrote:

[#3908] tcltklib load error from tk.rb — Wybo Dekker <wybo@...>

The current cvs says:

2 messages 2004/12/06
[#3912] Re: tcltklib load error from tk.rb — Hidetoshi NAGAI <nagai@...> 2004/12/07

From: Wybo Dekker <wybo@servalys.nl>

[#3914] Pathname needs a makeover — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...>

Hi all,

7 messages 2004/12/07
[#3915] Re: Pathname needs a makeover — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...> 2004/12/07

On Wednesday, December 8, 2004, 7:51:11 AM, Daniel wrote:
[#3916] Re: Pathname needs a makeover — Daniel Berger <djberg96@...> 2004/12/07

Hi,
[#3917] Re: Pathname needs a makeover — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...> 2004/12/08

On Wednesday, December 8, 2004, 10:47:49 AM, Daniel wrote:
[#3918] Re: Pathname needs a makeover — Daniel Berger <djberg96@...> 2004/12/08

[#3919] Re: Pathname needs a makeover — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2004/12/08

Hi,
[#3920] Re: Pathname needs a makeover — Tanaka Akira <akr@...17n.org> 2004/12/08

In article <8FE83020B9E1A248A182A9B0A7B76E7358B102@itomae2km07.AD.QINTRA.COM>,

[#3921] Re: Pathname needs a makeover — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...>

Tanaka Akira wrote:

2 messages 2004/12/08
[#3954] Re: Pathname needs a makeover — Tanaka Akira <akr@...17n.org> 2004/12/12

In article <8FE83020B9E1A248A182A9B0A7B76E7358B105@itomae2km07.AD.QINTRA.COM>,

[#3922] Incorrect escaping in strings produced by String::inspect — noreply@...

Bugs item #1173, was opened at 2004-12-08 17:35

7 messages 2004/12/08
[#3923] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-1173 ] Incorrect escaping in strings produced by String::inspect — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2004/12/08

Hi --
[#3924] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-1173 ] Incorrect escaping in strings produced by String::inspect — Florian Gro<florgro@...> 2004/12/08

David A. Black wrote:
[#3928] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-1173 ] Incorrect escaping in strings produced by String::inspect — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2004/12/09

Hi --
[#3936] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-1173 ] Incorrect escaping in strings produced by String::inspect — Florian Gro<florgro@...> 2004/12/09

David A. Black wrote:
[#3929] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-1173 ] Incorrect escaping in strings produced by String::inspect — nobu.nokada@... 2004/12/09

Hi,
[#3930] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-1173 ] Incorrect escaping in strings produced by String::inspect — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2004/12/09

Hi,

[#3939] "Invalid Argument" for Windows Sockets — noreply@...

Bugs item #1184, was opened at 2004-12-09 13:34

2 messages 2004/12/09
[#3940] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-1184 ] "Invalid Argument" for Windows Sockets — "U.Nakamura" <usa@...> 2004/12/10

Hello,

[#3941] String#sub祟臀聽㊤祀礒礙禮祓禺窿篏窿窿 — noreply@...

Bugs item #1186, was opened at 2004-12-10 23:11

2 messages 2004/12/10
[#3942] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-1186 ] String#sub — ts <decoux@...> 2004/12/10

>>>>> "n" == noreply <noreply@rubyforge.org> writes:

[#3943] Error handling in file related methods? — Johan Holmberg <holmberg@...>

3 messages 2004/12/10
[#4093] Re: Error handling in file related methods? — Austin Ziegler <halostatue@...> 2005/01/04

On Sat, 11 Dec 2004 01:21:50 +0900, Johan Holmberg <holmberg@iar.se> wrote:
[#4091] Re: Error handling in file related methods? — Johan Holmberg <holmberg@...> 2005/01/04

[#3944] mkmf enhancement for Win32 — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...>

Hi all,

3 messages 2004/12/10
[#3946] Re: mkmf enhancement for Win32 — nobu.nokada@... 2004/12/11

Hi,
[#3952] Re: mkmf enhancement for Win32 — Austin Ziegler <halostatue@...> 2004/12/11

On Sat, 11 Dec 2004 09:32:42 +0900, nobu.nokada@softhome.net

[#3945] Address of current client in DRb front object — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net>

DRb stores the current client in Thread.current['DRb']['client'], but

1 message 2004/12/10

[#3947] Build failure with 1.8.2 on Win32 — Daniel Berger <djberg96@...>

Hi all,

1 message 2004/12/11

[#3948] test stalling for test_readline (in TestReadline ) with cvs HEAD on mingw — noreply@...

Bugs item #1188, was opened at 11-12-2004 12:36

1 message 2004/12/11

[#3949] test stalling for test_open_pipe (in TestReadPartial) with cvs HEAD on mingw — noreply@...

Bugs item #1189, was opened at 11-12-2004 12:43

1 message 2004/12/11

[#3950] don't pass its tests — ts <decoux@...>

1 message 2004/12/11

[#3951] error using IO.popen on ruby19 (mingw) — noreply@...

Bugs item #1190, was opened at 11-12-2004 14:59

1 message 2004/12/11

[#3953] tracer.rb tries to extract source code from binary files — Florian Gro<florgro@...>

Moin!

1 message 2004/12/12

[#3957] DamageControl for Ruby — aslak hellesoy <aslak.hellesoy@...>

Hi folks,

1 message 2004/12/13

[#3958] Re: [ruby-cvs] ruby/lib/rexml/encodings: Merged in the changes from BSD bug report. shift-jis is now shift_jis, in — Kouhei Sutou <kou@...>

Hi,

1 message 2004/12/13

[#3959] Segmentation Fault with Sockets and Threads — noreply@...

Bugs item #1200, was opened at 2004-12-13 10:18

3 messages 2004/12/13
[#3960] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-1200 ] Segmentation Fault with Sockets and Threads — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2004/12/13

Hi,
[#3961] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-1200 ] Segmentation Fault with Sockets and Threads — "U.Nakamura" <usa@...> 2004/12/14

Hello,

[#3962] webrick — Charles Mills <cmills@...>

Webricks logging may cause it to fail on a valid http requests (on Mac

4 messages 2004/12/14
[#3963] Re: [BUG] webrick — GOTOU Yuuzou <gotoyuzo@...> 2004/12/14

Hi,
[#3964] Re: [BUG] webrick — Richard Kilmer <rich@...> 2004/12/14

[#3965] Re: [BUG] webrick — Charles Mills <cmills@...> 2004/12/14

On Dec 14, 2004, at 7:24 AM, Richard Kilmer wrote:

[#3966] unknown node type 0 — Andrew Walrond <andrew@...>

I still get this happening a lot with my Rubyx linux ruby script.

6 messages 2004/12/14
[#3970] Re: [BUG] unknown node type 0 - SERIOUS ENOUGH TO MIGRATE AWAY FROM RUBY? — Andrew Walrond <andrew@...> 2004/12/15

This is a long standing bug in Ruby, and has been reported hundreds of times
[#3971] Re: [BUG] unknown node type 0 - SERIOUS ENOUGH TO MIGRATE AWAY FROM RUBY? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2004/12/15

Hi,
[#3972] Re: [BUG] unknown node type 0 - SERIOUS ENOUGH TO MIGRATE AWAY FROM RUBY? — Andrew Walrond <andrew@...> 2004/12/15

On Wednesday 15 Dec 2004 14:11, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#4001] Re: [BUG] unknown node type 0 - SERIOUS ENOUGH TO MIGRATE AWAY FROM RUBY? — Andrew Walrond <andrew@...> 2004/12/22

On Wednesday 15 December 2004 14:11, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#4005] Re: [BUG] unknown node type 0 - SERIOUS ENOUGH TO MIGRATE AWAY FROM RUBY? — Joao Pedrosa <joaopedrosa@...> 2004/12/22

Hi,

[#3967] How does Ctrl-C on Win32 work? — Daniel Berger <djberg96@...>

Hi all,

1 message 2004/12/15

[#3968] webrick test_client_server does not pass — noreply@...

Bugs item #1208, was opened at 15-12-2004 11:05

2 messages 2004/12/15
[#3969] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-1208 ] webrick test_client_server does not pass — Michael Neumann <mneumann@...> 2004/12/15

noreply@rubyforge.org wrote:

[#3973] YAML::Syck::Parser#load dumps core — Tanaka Akira <akr@...17n.org>

Ruby dumps core as follows.

1 message 2004/12/15

[#3974] Patch to enable innetgr() & getnetgrent() suport in Etc — "James F. Hranicky" <jfh@...>

Here's a patch to enable netgroup support in the Etc module.

1 message 2004/12/18

[#3975] Patches to test/unit — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>

I believe these are the minimal patches needed to make it possible to

5 messages 2004/12/18
[#3979] Re: Patches to test/unit — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2004/12/18

would it be better to start submitting the patches to the rubyforge
[#3983] Re: Patches to test/unit — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2004/12/19

Hi,
[#3980] Re: Patches to test/unit — nobu.nokada@... 2004/12/19

Hi,
[#3988] Re: Patches to test/unit — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2004/12/20

[#3976] /lib/ruby/1.8/rational.rb:374: [BUG] Segmentation fault — Andrew Walrond <andrew@...>

I have been unable to reproduce this so far, but I guess the file/line-number

2 messages 2004/12/18
[#3977] Re: /lib/ruby/1.8/rational.rb:374: [BUG] Segmentation fault — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2004/12/18

Hi,

[#3978] The latest 1.8.2 cvs generates RI documentation really long time — noreply@...

Bugs item #1232, was opened at 2004-12-18 21:09

1 message 2004/12/18

[#3981] patch to cgi/session.rb — Kent Sibilev <ksibilev@...>

The recent change to the CGI::Session

2 messages 2004/12/19
[#3986] Re: patch to cgi/session.rb — nobu.nokada@... 2004/12/19

Hi,

[#3982] Win32: rb_sys_fail() - errno == 0 — Florian Gro<florgro@...>

Moin!

5 messages 2004/12/19
[#3984] Re: [BUG] Win32: rb_sys_fail() - errno == 0 — Daniel Berger <djberg96@...> 2004/12/19

Hi,
[#3987] Re: [BUG] Win32: rb_sys_fail() - errno == 0 — "U.Nakamura" <usa@...> 2004/12/20

Moin! Moin!
[#3989] Re: [BUG] Win32: rb_sys_fail() - errno == 0 — Florian Gro<florgro@...> 2004/12/20

U.Nakamura wrote:
[#3990] Re: [BUG] Win32: rb_sys_fail() - errno == 0 — "U.Nakamura" <usa@...> 2004/12/20

Moin!

[#3991] DL: structure with member of pointer type gives error — noreply@...

Bugs item #1236, was opened at 2004-12-20 13:49

1 message 2004/12/20

[#3992] Hash#delete - inconsistent with docs — Charles Mills <cmills@...>

irb(main):001:0> h = Hash.new("go fish")

3 messages 2004/12/21
[#3998] Re: Hash#delete - inconsistent with docs — "daz" <dooby@...10.karoo.co.uk> 2004/12/22

[#3994] Re: Hash#delete - inconsistent with docs — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2004/12/21

Hi --

[#3993] serious memory leak + continuations — Michael Neumann <mneumann@...>

Hi,

2 messages 2004/12/21
[#3995] Re: [bug] serious memory leak + continuations — Michael Neumann <mneumann@...> 2004/12/21

Michael Neumann wrote:

[#3996] Updated ssh key — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

Sorry to be an idiot, but I've just updated machines. Who do I send a

2 messages 2004/12/21
[#3997] Re: Updated ssh key — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2004/12/22

Hi,

[#3999] ruby 1.8.1 installation problems on ia64/altix — noreply@...

Bugs item #1243, was opened at 2004-12-21 19:23

1 message 2004/12/22

[#4000] 1.8.2 preview4 — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>

Hello,

5 messages 2004/12/22
[#4002] Re: 1.8.2 preview4 — Tom Copeland <tom@...> 2004/12/22

On Wed, 2004-12-22 at 04:03, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#4004] Re: 1.8.2 preview4 — Austin Ziegler <halostatue@...> 2004/12/22

On Thu, 23 Dec 2004 00:10:07 +0900, Tom Copeland <tom@infoether.com> wrote:
[#4003] Re: 1.8.2 preview4 — Johan Holmberg <holmberg@...> 2004/12/22

[#4007] Re: 1.8.2 preview4 — nobu.nokada@... 2004/12/23

Hi,

[#4006] cgi.rb GET and POST values patch — "Eustaquio Rangel de Oliveira Jr." <eustaquiorangel@...>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

1 message 2004/12/22

[#4008] Question about the latest change to test/unit library — Kent Sibilev <ksibilev@...>

It used to be possible to run unit test scripts by simply requiring

3 messages 2004/12/23
[#4012] Re: Question about the latest change to test/unit library — nobu.nokada@... 2004/12/23

Hi,
[#4014] Re: Question about the latest change to test/unit library — Kent Sibilev <ksibilev@...> 2004/12/23

I didn't know about testrb script. Wouldn't it make sense to keep that

[#4009] cgi.rb -- more GET/POST stuff — mde@...26.com

First of all, I think it would be great, as Eustaquio suggests, to

17 messages 2004/12/23
[#4016] Re: [PATCH] cgi.rb -- more GET/POST stuff — Francis Hwang <sera@...> 2004/12/24

GETs and POSTs are defined to be fairly different actions. I'd read
[#4020] Re: [PATCH] cgi.rb -- more GET/POST stuff — mde@...26.com 2004/12/25

Some more thoughts / clarification on cgi.rb. This might be
[#4017] Re: [PATCH] cgi.rb -- more GET/POST stuff — "Eust痃uio Rangel de Oliveira Jr." <eustaquiorangel@...> 2004/12/24

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
[#4018] Re: [PATCH] cgi.rb -- more GET/POST stuff — Francis Hwang <sera@...> 2004/12/24

[#4019] Re: [PATCH] cgi.rb -- more GET/POST stuff — "trans. (T. Onoma)" <transami@...> 2004/12/24

On Friday 24 December 2004 02:39 pm, "Eust叩quio Rangel de Oliveira Jr." wrote:
[#4023] Re: [PATCH] cgi.rb -- more GET/POST stuff — "Eustáquio Rangel de Oliveira Jr." <eustaquiorangel@...> 2004/12/25

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
[#4245] Re: [PATCH] cgi.rb -- more GET/POST stuff — Patrick May <patrick@...> 2005/01/15

Hello,
[#4024] Re: [PATCH] cgi.rb -- more GET/POST stuff — James Britt <ruby@...> 2004/12/25

Francis Hwang wrote:
[#4026] Re: [PATCH] cgi.rb -- more GET/POST stuff — "Eust痃uio Rangel de Oliveira Jr." <eustaquiorangel@...> 2004/12/25

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
[#4028] Re: [PATCH] cgi.rb -- more GET/POST stuff — mde@...26.com 2004/12/27

First of all, the entire discussion of when GET is appropriate
[#4029] Re: [PATCH] cgi.rb -- more GET/POST stuff — "Eustaquio Rangel de Oliveira Jr." <eustaquiorangel@...> 2004/12/27

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
[#4031] Re: [PATCH] cgi.rb -- more GET/POST stuff — James Britt <ruby@...> 2004/12/27

mde@state26.com wrote:
[#4032] Re: [PATCH] cgi.rb -- more GET/POST stuff — "Eustaquio Rangel de Oliveira Jr." <eustaquiorangel@...> 2004/12/27

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
[#4035] Re: [PATCH] cgi.rb -- more GET/POST stuff — James Britt <ruby@...> 2004/12/27

Eustaquio Rangel de Oliveira Jr. wrote:
[#4054] Re: [PATCH] cgi.rb -- more GET/POST stuff — mde@...26.com 2004/12/29

Okay, the last little bit of follow up here ...
[#4056] Re: [PATCH] cgi.rb -- more GET/POST stuff — Francis Hwang <sera@...> 2004/12/29

Much of the discussion about web programming techniques can be moved to

[#4010] YAML::Syck::Loader#transfer dumps core — Tanaka Akira <akr@...17n.org>

Ruby dumps core as follows.

3 messages 2004/12/23
[#4011] Re: YAML::Syck::Loader#transfer dumps core — nobu.nokada@... 2004/12/23

Moin,
[#4013] Re: YAML::Syck::Loader#transfer dumps core — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2004/12/23

Hello,

[#4015] backtrace lost when throwing exceptions from procs defined in extensions — noreply@...

Bugs item #1251, was opened at 2004-12-23 14:55

1 message 2004/12/23

[#4021] File#reopen bug in 1.8.2 — "David A. Black" <dblack@...>

Hi --

2 messages 2004/12/25
[#4022] Re: [BUG] File#reopen bug in 1.8.2 — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2004/12/25

Hi --

[#4025] Rdoc crash when running on /usr/local/lib/ruby with --ri-site — noreply@...

Bugs item #1254, was opened at 2004-12-25 14:23

1 message 2004/12/25

[#4027] Allowing custom number literal suffixes? — Florian Gro<florgro@...>

Moin!

35 messages 2004/12/27
[#4030] Re: Allowing custom number literal suffixes? — Peter <Peter.Vanbroekhoven@...> 2004/12/27

A version that works for 1.9 is attached. (With the one attached by
[#4057] Re: Allowing custom number literal suffixes? — "trans. (T. Onoma)" <transami@...> 2004/12/29

All this talk about such trivial and obviously reasonable changes to cgi.rb
[#4070] Re: Allowing custom number literal suffixes? — nobu.nokada@... 2005/01/02

Hi,
[#4072] Re: Allowing custom number literal suffixes? — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2005/01/02

[#4079] Re: Allowing custom number literal suffixes? — Florian Gro<florgro@...> 2005/01/03

Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
[#4081] Re: Allowing custom number literal suffixes? — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2005/01/03

[#4082] Re: Allowing custom number literal suffixes? — Florian Gro<florgro@...> 2005/01/03

Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
[#4084] Re: Allowing custom number literal suffixes? — Brent Roman <brent@...> 2005/01/04

I'm not sure I would advocate making Ruby's grammar even more
[#4086] Re: Allowing custom number literal suffixes? — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2005/01/04

[#4107] Re: Allowing custom number literal suffixes? — Brent Roman <brent@...> 2005/01/04

>
[#4109] Re: Allowing custom number literal suffixes? — Florian Gro<florgro@...> 2005/01/04

Brent Roman wrote:
[#4112] Re: Allowing custom number literal suffixes? — Brent Roman <brent@...> 2005/01/05

> Brent Roman wrote:
[#4113] Re: Allowing custom number literal suffixes? — Florian Gro<florgro@...> 2005/01/05

Brent Roman wrote:
[#4115] Re: Allowing custom number literal suffixes? — Brent Roman <brent@...> 2005/01/05

> Florian Gross wrote:
[#4127] Re: Allowing custom number literal suffixes? — Peter <Peter.Vanbroekhoven@...> 2005/01/05

> Is there a parsing ambiguity that would result from allowing a suffix
[#4130] Re: Allowing custom number literal suffixes? — Brent Roman <brent@...> 2005/01/06

This looks great. Thank you.
[#4129] Re: Allowing custom number literal suffixes? — Florian Gro<florgro@...> 2005/01/06

Peter wrote:
[#4131] Re: Allowing custom number literal suffixes? — "trans. (T. Onoma)" <transami@...> 2005/01/06

On Wednesday 05 January 2005 07:41 pm, Florian Groß wrote:
[#4132] Re: Allowing custom number literal suffixes? — Brent Roman <brent@...> 2005/01/06

transami wrote:
[#4122] Re: Allowing custom number literal suffixes? — Florian Gro<florgro@...> 2005/01/05

Brent Roman wrote:
[#4136] Re: Allowing custom number literal suffixes? — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2005/01/06

[#4090] Re: Allowing custom number literal suffixes? — Michael Neumann <mneumann@...> 2005/01/04

Brent Roman wrote:
[#4085] Re: Allowing custom number literal suffixes? — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2005/01/04

[#4089] Re: Allowing custom number literal suffixes? — Florian Gro<florgro@...> 2005/01/04

Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
[#4097] Re: Allowing custom number literal suffixes? — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2005/01/04

[#4100] Re: Allowing custom number literal suffixes? — Florian Gro<florgro@...> 2005/01/04

Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
[#4102] Re: Allowing custom number literal suffixes? — Peter <Peter.Vanbroekhoven@...> 2005/01/04

> I'm not feeling well about having these functions that would only be
[#4104] Re: Allowing custom number literal suffixes? — Florian Gro<florgro@...> 2005/01/04

Peter wrote:
[#4148] Re: Allowing custom number literal suffixes? — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2005/01/06

[#4151] Re: Allowing custom number literal suffixes? — Florian Gro<florgro@...> 2005/01/06

Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
[#4161] Re: Allowing custom number literal suffixes? — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2005/01/07

[#4163] Re: Allowing custom number literal suffixes? — Florian Gro<florgro@...> 2005/01/08

Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
[#4165] Re: Allowing custom number literal suffixes? — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2005/01/08

[#4077] Re: Allowing custom number literal suffixes? — Florian Gro<florgro@...> 2005/01/03

nobu.nokada@softhome.net wrote:

[#4033] Garbage collection trouble — Christian Neukirchen <chneukirchen@...>

Hello,

13 messages 2004/12/27
[#4034] Re: Garbage collection trouble — Michael Neumann <mneumann@...> 2004/12/27

Christian Neukirchen wrote:
[#4036] Re: Garbage collection trouble — ts <decoux@...> 2004/12/27

>>>>> "C" == Christian Neukirchen <chneukirchen@gmail.com> writes:
[#4038] Re: Garbage collection trouble — Christian Neukirchen <chneukirchen@...> 2004/12/27

ts <decoux@moulon.inra.fr> writes:
[#4043] Re: Garbage collection trouble — ts <decoux@...> 2004/12/28

>>>>> "C" == Christian Neukirchen <chneukirchen@gmail.com> writes:
[#4045] Re: Garbage collection trouble — Alexander Kellett <ruby-lists@...> 2004/12/28

i'm right in saying that i haven't messed up
[#4046] Re: Garbage collection trouble — ts <decoux@...> 2004/12/28

>>>>> "A" == Alexander Kellett <ruby-lists@lypanov.net> writes:
[#4047] Re: Garbage collection trouble — Alexander Kellett <ruby-lists@...> 2004/12/28

it still crashes even with GC.disable
[#4048] Re: Garbage collection trouble — ts <decoux@...> 2004/12/28

>>>>> "A" == Alexander Kellett <ruby-lists@lypanov.net> writes:
[#4051] Re: Garbage collection trouble — Christian Neukirchen <chneukirchen@...> 2004/12/28

Alexander Kellett <ruby-lists@lypanov.net> writes:
[#4049] Re: Garbage collection trouble — Christian Neukirchen <chneukirchen@...> 2004/12/28

ts <decoux@moulon.inra.fr> writes:
[#4050] Re: Garbage collection trouble — ts <decoux@...> 2004/12/28

>>>>> "C" == Christian Neukirchen <chneukirchen@gmail.com> writes:
[#4037] Re: Garbage collection trouble — Takaaki Tateishi <ttate@...> 2004/12/27

Christian Neukirchen wrote:

[#4039] To make "Thread.critical" sections "trap" safe — Brent Roman <brent@...>

I recently was involved in trying to get a multi-threaded ruby motion

1 message 2004/12/27

[#4040] Extensions, Internal — Jgen Mangler <juergen.mangler@...>

Hi,

5 messages 2004/12/28
[#4732] RDoc Patch — Jgen Mangler <juergen.mangler@...> 2005/04/17

It would be nice to have the following patch in rdoc/parse_c.rb
[#4041] Re: Extensions, Internal — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2004/12/28

Hi,
[#4042] Re: Extensions, Internal — Jgen Mangler <juergen.mangler@...> 2004/12/28

myObj.text.gsub!(/a/,"b") will not alter the string returned by #text,
[#4044] Re: Extensions, Internal — ts <decoux@...> 2004/12/28

>>>>> "J" == Jgen Mangler?= <ISO-8859-1> writes:

[#4052] YAML::Syck::Loader#transfer dumps core again — Tanaka Akira <akr@...17n.org>

Ruby dumps core as follows.

1 message 2004/12/28

[#4053] Thread rendezvous with timeouts — Brent Roman <brent@...>

We needed an event scheduler to manage our multi-threaded motion control

1 message 2004/12/28

[#4055] Latest CVS HEAD ChangeLog has conflict marker — ville.mattila@...

Hi,

1 message 2004/12/29

[#4058] Re: Latest CVS HEAD ChangeLog has conflict marker — ville.mattila@...

2 messages 2004/12/29
[#4059] Re: Latest CVS HEAD ChangeLog has conflict marker — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2004/12/29

[#4060] Hash#update docs — Charles Mills <cmills@...>

Here is a possible update for the documentation:

2 messages 2004/12/30
[#4064] Re: Hash#update docs — Kaspar Schiess <eule@...> 2004/12/31

(In response to news:3E59898C-5A83-11D9-80A4-000A95A27A10@freeshell.org by

[#4061] curious about 1.8.2 change - empty method returns nil — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>

* parse.y (reduce_nodes): empty body should return nil.

4 messages 2004/12/31
[#4062] Re: curious about 1.8.2 change - empty method returns nil — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2004/12/31

Hi,
[#4063] Re: curious about 1.8.2 change - empty method returns nil — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2004/12/31

On Dec 30, 2004, at 9:51 PM, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#4066] Re: curious about 1.8.2 change - empty method returns nil — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2005/01/01

Hi,

Re: [PATCH] cgi.rb -- more GET/POST stuff

From: "Eust痃uio Rangel de Oliveira Jr." <eustaquiorangel@...>
Date: 2004-12-24 19:39:32 UTC
List: ruby-core #4017 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi!

| GETs and POSTs are defined to be fairly different actions. I'd read
| http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/Axioms.html, which is stated to be Tim
| Berners-Lee's personal opinion, but I suspect is fairly close to how
| many others in the HTTP standards community see it. GETs are for
| requests that will not change the resource in question (and can be
| safely bookmarked), POSTs are for requests that will change something
| (and should not be bookmarked).

But what you think about keeping the values of GET and POST on different
Hashes?

- ----------------------------
Eust痃uio "TaQ" Rangel
eustaquiorangel@yahoo.com
http://beam.to/taq
Usu疵io GNU/Linux no. 224050
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFBzHCYb6UiZnhJiLsRAiuzAKC2pFRytVm3BYcfB5H9qigK/Uu3nACaAlwG
VXdU25yRUixPAy6o8E9an3o=
=ysht
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

In This Thread

Prev Next