[#3861] super — ts <decoux@...>
[#3862] Marshal.dump'ing OpenStruct objects — Mauricio Fern疣dez <batsman.geo@...>
Hi,
[#3881] mkdir, mkdir_p in FileUtils and mode — Florian Frank <flori@...>
Hello,
[#3907] Obtaining mode information on an IO object — Jos Backus <jos@...>
The attached patch implements IO#mode. This method returns the mode the IO
Hi,
On Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 09:25:13AM +0900, nobu.nokada@softhome.net wrote:
Jos Backus wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Dec 09, 2004 at 10:47:48AM +0900, nobu.nokada@softhome.net wrote:
On Thu, Dec 09, 2004 at 02:40:33PM +0900, James Britt wrote:
[#3914] Pathname needs a makeover — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...>
Hi all,
[#3922] Incorrect escaping in strings produced by String::inspect — noreply@...
Bugs item #1173, was opened at 2004-12-08 17:35
[#3966] unknown node type 0 — Andrew Walrond <andrew@...>
I still get this happening a lot with my Rubyx linux ruby script.
This is a long standing bug in Ruby, and has been reported hundreds of times
Hi,
[#3975] Patches to test/unit — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>
I believe these are the minimal patches needed to make it possible to
[#3982] Win32: rb_sys_fail() - errno == 0 — Florian Gro<florgro@...>
Moin!
[#4000] 1.8.2 preview4 — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
Hello,
[#4009] cgi.rb -- more GET/POST stuff — mde@...26.com
First of all, I think it would be great, as Eustaquio suggests, to
GETs and POSTs are defined to be fairly different actions. I'd read
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Francis Hwang wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
First of all, the entire discussion of when GET is appropriate
mde@state26.com wrote:
[#4027] Allowing custom number literal suffixes? — Florian Gro<florgro@...>
Moin!
Hi,
Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
I'm not sure I would advocate making Ruby's grammar even more
>
Brent Roman wrote:
> Brent Roman wrote:
Brent Roman wrote:
> Florian Gross wrote:
Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
[#4033] Garbage collection trouble — Christian Neukirchen <chneukirchen@...>
Hello,
>>>>> "C" == Christian Neukirchen <chneukirchen@gmail.com> writes:
ts <decoux@moulon.inra.fr> writes:
>>>>> "C" == Christian Neukirchen <chneukirchen@gmail.com> writes:
[#4040] Extensions, Internal — Jgen Mangler <juergen.mangler@...>
Hi,
[ ruby-Bugs-1251 ] backtrace lost when throwing exceptions from procs defined in extensions
Bugs item #1251, was opened at 2004-12-23 14:55
You can respond by visiting:
http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=1698&aid=1251&group_id=426
Category: Core
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Paul Brannan (cout)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: backtrace lost when throwing exceptions from procs defined in extensions
Initial Comment:
If I have an extension like this:
[pbrannan@zaphod ext]$ cat test.c
#include <ruby.h>
VALUE p = Qnil;
VALUE foo(VALUE self)
{
VALUE args[] = { rb_str_new2("foo") };
rb_funcall3(p, rb_intern("call"), 1, args);
}
VALUE myproc(VALUE arg, VALUE data, VALUE self)
{
Check_Type(Qnil, T_ARRAY); /* throw an exception */
}
void Init_test()
{
p = rb_proc_new(myproc, Qnil);
rb_define_method(rb_cObject, "foo", foo, 0);
}
I would expect to get a usable stack trace from the following ruby script (showing that test.rb:11 called baz called bar called foo):
[pbrannan@zaphod ext]$ cat test.rb
require 'test.so'
def bar
foo()
end
def baz
bar()
end
baz()
But I do not:
[pbrannan@zaphod ext]$ ruby -v test.rb
ruby 1.8.2 (2004-12-22) [i686-linux]
./test.so: wrong argument type nil (expected Array) (TypeError)
In more complex programs I have seen this bug cause ruby to show that an exception that's raised in one place in my program as if it were raised in a completely different place.
This bug occurs on both 1.8.1 and 1.8.2preview4.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can respond by visiting:
http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=1698&aid=1251&group_id=426