[#4065] Surprise in Time#sec — Steven Jenkins <steven.jenkins@...>
This bit me:
[#4067] Segfault in Thread#initialize / caller — Florian Gro<florgro@...>
Moin!
[#4076] Ruby/DL — Jamis Buck <jamis_buck@...>
I recently used Ruby/DL to create bindings to the SQLite3 embedded
On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 02:53:49AM +0900, Jamis Buck wrote:
>>>>> "P" == Paul Brannan <pbrannan@atdesk.com> writes:
On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 03:05:48AM +0900, ts wrote:
>>>>> "P" == Paul Brannan <pbrannan@atdesk.com> writes:
On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 01:10:34AM +0900, ts wrote:
>>>>> "P" == Paul Brannan <pbrannan@atdesk.com> writes:
On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 06:57:57PM +0900, ts wrote:
>>>>> "P" == Paul Brannan <pbrannan@atdesk.com> writes:
On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 12:06:16AM +0900, ts wrote:
>>>>> "P" == Paul Brannan <pbrannan@atdesk.com> writes:
ts wrote:
[#4116] Test::Unit::Collector::Dir won't work with code that modifies $LOAD_PATH — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net>
Any test code that depends upon modifications of $: fails when used
Hi,
On 11 Jan 2005, at 04:14, nobu.nokada@softhome.net wrote:
On 11 Jan 2005, at 09:39, Eric Hodel wrote:
On Sat, 15 Jan 2005 04:06:10 +0900, Eric Hodel <drbrain@segment7.net> wrote:
On Fri, 14 Jan 2005 23:48:58 -0500, Nathaniel Talbott
On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 17:17:14 -0500, Nathaniel Talbott
[#4146] The face of Unicode support in the future — Charles O Nutter <headius@...>
Hello Rubyists!
Hi,
Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> writes:
Paul Brannan <pbrannan@atdesk.com> writes:
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 11:53:48PM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi,
Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Jan 12, 2005 at 02:13:35PM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi,
[#4189] Authenticated proxy support for open-uri — Neil Kohl <nakohl@...>
Hello!
[#4232] Carriage return on shebang — Florian Gro<florgro@...>
Moin.
[#4242] tracer.rb: Do not list pseudo source lines of binary extensions — Florian Gro<florgro@...>
Moin.
[#4243] Patch that enables https in open-uri.rb — Michael Neumann <mneumann@...>
Hi,
In article <41E93F42.9090705@ntecs.de>,
Tanaka Akira wrote:
[#4269] Re: The face of Unicode support in the future — Wes Nakamura <wknaka@...>
Hi,
Hi,
Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi,
[#4296] parse_c.rb: allow whitespace after function names — Tilman Sauerbeck <tilman@...>
Hi,
Hi,
Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> [2005-01-21 17:43]:
[#4311] RFE: Enumerable#group_by, Array#^ — Florian Gro<florgro@...>
Moin.
[#4323] test/unit doesn't rescue a Exception — Tanaka Akira <akr@...17n.org>
test/unit doesn't rescue a Exception in a test method, as follows.
In article <87is5jb46q.fsf@serein.a02.aist.go.jp>,
On 9/1/06, Tanaka Akira <akr@fsij.org> wrote:
On Sep 2, 2006, at 6:34 PM, Nathaniel Talbott wrote:
In article <A604C0B3-95ED-4B9B-866C-79A2C7D5E3C4@segment7.net>,
On Sep 2, 2006, at 9:39 PM, Tanaka Akira wrote:
In article <622DAC7E-55DB-4854-B82B-A037CE9C75EF@segment7.net>,
In article <87ac5hv4bo.fsf@fsij.org>,
On Sep 3, 2006, at 8:21 AM, Tanaka Akira wrote:
[#4332] IO#clearerr missing in action — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net>
I wanted to implement tail(1) in ruby cleanly, but found the best I
[#4335] When will Object#type disappear? — "David A. Black" <dblack@...>
Hi --
Re: Allowing custom number literal suffixes?
> Is there a parsing ambiguity that would result from allowing a suffix
> to be any legal method identifier? This certainly would result in more
> readable code and far less chance that different libraries would attempt to
> define literals with the same suffix.
There's no problem with allowing any method identifier as suffix from the
parsing point of view.
A possible implementation is attached. "1:10"PM calls
String::Literal::PM("1:10"). It is implemented differently than the patch
for number literal suffixes which shows in the fact that there can be a
space between the string and the suffix, and that a suffix like 'class'
won't work because 'class' is a reserved word. This was the easy
implementation...
Funny thing: "1:10"methods calls String::Literal::methods("1:10") which
happily returns all methods in String::Literal. That's the downside of
using the unchanged suffix as method name.
Peter
Attachments (1)
--- parse.y 13 Oct 2004 19:46:40 -0000 1.1.1.1
+++ parse.y 5 Jan 2005 22:03:19 -0000 1.1.1.1.24.1
@@ -1913,6 +1913,17 @@
node = evstr2dstr(node);
}
$$ = node;
+ }
+ | string tIDENTIFIER
+ {
+ NODE *node = $1;
+ if (!node) {
+ node = NEW_STR(rb_str_new(0, 0));
+ }
+ else {
+ node = evstr2dstr(node);
+ }
+ $$ = NEW_CALL(NEW_LIT(rb_mStringLiteral), $2, NEW_LIST(node));
}
;
--- ruby.h 13 Oct 2004 19:47:00 -0000 1.1.1.1
+++ ruby.h 5 Jan 2005 22:03:19 -0000 1.1.1.1.24.1
@@ -565,6 +565,7 @@
RUBY_EXTERN VALUE rb_mGC;
RUBY_EXTERN VALUE rb_mMath;
RUBY_EXTERN VALUE rb_mProcess;
+RUBY_EXTERN VALUE rb_mStringLiteral;
RUBY_EXTERN VALUE rb_cObject;
RUBY_EXTERN VALUE rb_cArray;
--- string.c 13 Oct 2004 19:47:14 -0000 1.1.1.1
+++ string.c 5 Jan 2005 22:03:20 -0000 1.1.1.1.24.1
@@ -26,6 +26,7 @@
#endif
VALUE rb_cString;
+VALUE rb_mStringLiteral;
#define STR_ASSOC FL_USER3
@@ -4675,4 +4676,6 @@
rb_fs = Qnil;
rb_define_variable("$;", &rb_fs);
rb_define_variable("$-F", &rb_fs);
+
+ rb_mStringLiteral = rb_define_module_under(rb_cString, "Literal");
}