[#4076] Ruby/DL — Jamis Buck <jamis_buck@...>

I recently used Ruby/DL to create bindings to the SQLite3 embedded

40 messages 2005/01/03
[#4096] Re: Ruby/DL — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2005/01/04

On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 02:53:49AM +0900, Jamis Buck wrote:

[#4099] Re: Ruby/DL — ts <decoux@...> 2005/01/04

>>>>> "P" == Paul Brannan <pbrannan@atdesk.com> writes:

[#4119] Re: Ruby/DL — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2005/01/05

On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 03:05:48AM +0900, ts wrote:

[#4120] Re: Ruby/DL — ts <decoux@...> 2005/01/05

>>>>> "P" == Paul Brannan <pbrannan@atdesk.com> writes:

[#4125] Re: Ruby/DL — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2005/01/05

On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 01:10:34AM +0900, ts wrote:

[#4116] Test::Unit::Collector::Dir won't work with code that modifies $LOAD_PATH — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net>

Any test code that depends upon modifications of $: fails when used

10 messages 2005/01/05

[#4146] The face of Unicode support in the future — Charles O Nutter <headius@...>

Hello Rubyists!

47 messages 2005/01/06
[#4152] Re: The face of Unicode support in the future — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2005/01/07

Hi,

[#4167] Re: The face of Unicode support in the future — Christian Neukirchen <chneukirchen@...> 2005/01/09

Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> writes:

[#4175] Re: The face of Unicode support in the future — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2005/01/10

Hi,

[#4186] Re: The face of Unicode support in the future — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2005/01/11

On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 11:53:48PM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#4192] Re: The face of Unicode support in the future — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2005/01/12

Hi,

[#4269] Re: The face of Unicode support in the future — Wes Nakamura <wknaka@...>

19 messages 2005/01/18
[#4270] Re: The face of Unicode support in the future — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2005/01/18

Hi,

[#4275] Re: The face of Unicode support in the future — Wes Nakamura <wknaka@...> 2005/01/19

[#4323] test/unit doesn't rescue a Exception — Tanaka Akira <akr@...17n.org>

test/unit doesn't rescue a Exception in a test method, as follows.

14 messages 2005/01/27
[#8773] Re: test/unit doesn't rescue a Exception — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2006/09/02

In article <87is5jb46q.fsf@serein.a02.aist.go.jp>,

[#8776] Re: test/unit doesn't rescue a Exception — "Nathaniel Talbott" <ntalbott@...> 2006/09/03

On 9/1/06, Tanaka Akira <akr@fsij.org> wrote:

[#8777] Re: test/unit doesn't rescue a Exception — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2006/09/03

On Sep 2, 2006, at 6:34 PM, Nathaniel Talbott wrote:

Re: Segfault in timer.rb

From: Erlend Oye <segfault.ruby-talk@...>
Date: 2005-01-16 05:16:10 UTC
List: ruby-core #4247
Alexander Kellett wrote:
> On Jan 13, 2005, at 7:49 PM, Seg Fault wrote:
> 
>> I've spent more than a week dealing with this on
>> various machines and am almost driven to the brink of
>> looking for another language :(
> 
> 
> instead of that try another version of ruby
> rather than that joke of a platform named 'cygwin'
> 

  I'll do that when someone officially tells me that 'cygwin' is
  not a supported platform.

> try the mswin32 port, or the mingw32 port,
> both easy to find using google.
> 
> Alex
> 

   That joke of a platform named 'cygwin' has Perl/Ruby/Python
X Applications, Gnome, GTK... and so on built for it and working
just fine everyday. It has a nicely supported pkg system which
lets me switch from my Solaris system and not even notice much
difference, letting me install and use most *nix apps I use
everyday.

   MinGW32 is "MINmalist GNU for Win32", meaning it comes with
nothing. You have to hunt for packages and are barely able to
find anything other than basic compiler toolchain. Heck, configure
for 'Screen' said it didn't even support the 'select' call??? not
to mention the basic *nixisms like fork (of course).

   I can always use the release builds but I should be able to do builds
from the CVS and report the bugs and ask for help in Cygwin instead of
the suggestions that I switch platforms....and no, you are not the first
one suggesting this. This has been suggested on IRC
(#ruby-lang/freenode) too.

   So, I'd like to know - is Cygwin a supported  platform or not?
Saying it sucks and that's where the bug lies is not solving
anything here when we haven't even figured out where the bug is.

   Look at the first response to Trans's question on the list today
about what do people want from Ruby...the answer says "The code
should work on all platform without any fuss like perl". So I
sure am not the only one looking for this.

   Dangling unanswered questions are just going to turn the users away
and I would be away already if I was not serious about wanting to use
it on all my machine getting all the newer things that keep coming in
(via CVS).

-Erlend Oye

In This Thread

Prev Next