[#4076] Ruby/DL — Jamis Buck <jamis_buck@...>

I recently used Ruby/DL to create bindings to the SQLite3 embedded

40 messages 2005/01/03
[#4096] Re: Ruby/DL — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2005/01/04

On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 02:53:49AM +0900, Jamis Buck wrote:

[#4099] Re: Ruby/DL — ts <decoux@...> 2005/01/04

>>>>> "P" == Paul Brannan <pbrannan@atdesk.com> writes:

[#4119] Re: Ruby/DL — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2005/01/05

On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 03:05:48AM +0900, ts wrote:

[#4120] Re: Ruby/DL — ts <decoux@...> 2005/01/05

>>>>> "P" == Paul Brannan <pbrannan@atdesk.com> writes:

[#4125] Re: Ruby/DL — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2005/01/05

On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 01:10:34AM +0900, ts wrote:

[#4116] Test::Unit::Collector::Dir won't work with code that modifies $LOAD_PATH — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net>

Any test code that depends upon modifications of $: fails when used

10 messages 2005/01/05

[#4146] The face of Unicode support in the future — Charles O Nutter <headius@...>

Hello Rubyists!

47 messages 2005/01/06
[#4152] Re: The face of Unicode support in the future — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2005/01/07

Hi,

[#4167] Re: The face of Unicode support in the future — Christian Neukirchen <chneukirchen@...> 2005/01/09

Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> writes:

[#4175] Re: The face of Unicode support in the future — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2005/01/10

Hi,

[#4186] Re: The face of Unicode support in the future — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2005/01/11

On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 11:53:48PM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#4192] Re: The face of Unicode support in the future — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2005/01/12

Hi,

[#4269] Re: The face of Unicode support in the future — Wes Nakamura <wknaka@...>

19 messages 2005/01/18
[#4270] Re: The face of Unicode support in the future — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2005/01/18

Hi,

[#4275] Re: The face of Unicode support in the future — Wes Nakamura <wknaka@...> 2005/01/19

[#4323] test/unit doesn't rescue a Exception — Tanaka Akira <akr@...17n.org>

test/unit doesn't rescue a Exception in a test method, as follows.

14 messages 2005/01/27
[#8773] Re: test/unit doesn't rescue a Exception — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2006/09/02

In article <87is5jb46q.fsf@serein.a02.aist.go.jp>,

[#8776] Re: test/unit doesn't rescue a Exception — "Nathaniel Talbott" <ntalbott@...> 2006/09/03

On 9/1/06, Tanaka Akira <akr@fsij.org> wrote:

[#8777] Re: test/unit doesn't rescue a Exception — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2006/09/03

On Sep 2, 2006, at 6:34 PM, Nathaniel Talbott wrote:

Re: [BUG] Carriage return on shebang

From: nobu.nokada@...
Date: 2005-01-15 00:47:55 UTC
List: ruby-core #4236
Moin,

At Sat, 15 Jan 2005 06:08:06 +0900,
Florian Growrote in [ruby-core:04232]:
> If you can think of any problems that ignoring trailing carriage returns 
> would cause, please tell me. Thanks.

Traling CR of a long option is already ignored.



Index: ruby.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/ruby/src/ruby/ruby.c,v
retrieving revision 1.94
diff -U2 -p -r1.94 ruby.c
--- ruby.c	24 Sep 2004 05:53:41 -0000	1.94
+++ ruby.c	15 Jan 2005 00:44:16 -0000
@@ -684,7 +684,18 @@ proc_options(argc, argv)
 	    break;
 
+	  case '\r':
+	    if (!s[1]) break;
+
 	  default:
-	    fprintf(stderr, "%s: invalid option -%c  (-h will show valid options)\n",
-		    origargv[0], *s);
+	    {
+		const char *format;
+		if (ISPRINT(*s)) {
+		    format = "%s: invalid option -%c  (-h will show valid options)\n";
+		}
+		else {
+		    format = "%s: invalid option -\\%03o  (-h will show valid options)\n";
+		}
+		fprintf(stderr, format, origargv[0], (int)(unsigned char)*s);
+	    }
 	    exit(2);
 


-- 
Nobu Nakada


In This Thread