[#4479] Requesting addition to IRB (configurable standard output) — Sascha Ebach <se@...>

Hello,

13 messages 2005/02/24
[#4482] Re: Requesting addition to IRB (configurable standard output) — Sam Roberts <sroberts@...> 2005/02/25

Quoting se@digitale-wertschoepfung.de, on Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 01:22:34AM +0900:

[#4483] Re: Requesting addition to IRB (configurable standard output) — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2005/02/25

On 24 Feb 2005, at 19:51, Sam Roberts wrote:

[#4488] Re: Requesting addition to IRB (configurable standard output) — Sam Roberts <sroberts@...> 2005/02/26

Quoting drbrain@segment7.net, on Sat, Feb 26, 2005 at 02:43:31AM +0900:

[#4489] Re: Requesting addition to IRB (configurable standard output) — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2005/02/26

On 25 Feb 2005, at 16:03, Sam Roberts wrote:

Re: [PATCH] IO#clearerr missing in action

From: Tanaka Akira <akr@...17n.org>
Date: 2005-02-01 03:49:53 UTC
List: ruby-core #4344
In article <93e943b735aa76574c10b35088a04a39@segment7.net>,
  Eric Hodel <drbrain@segment7.net> writes:

> Would it make sense to add this to Ruby 1.8 only then?

No.  It is too drastic to incorporate to 1.8.

> Or to patch rb_io_eof to clearerr before feof?

It changes 1.8 behavior.  Some people complained 1.8 changes in
ruby-dev recently.  [ruby-talk:127406]

So I'm coward to introduce the incompatibility to 1.8.
-- 
Tanaka Akira

In This Thread

Prev Next