[#4479] Requesting addition to IRB (configurable standard output) — Sascha Ebach <se@...>

Hello,

13 messages 2005/02/24
[#4482] Re: Requesting addition to IRB (configurable standard output) — Sam Roberts <sroberts@...> 2005/02/25

Quoting se@digitale-wertschoepfung.de, on Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 01:22:34AM +0900:

[#4483] Re: Requesting addition to IRB (configurable standard output) — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2005/02/25

On 24 Feb 2005, at 19:51, Sam Roberts wrote:

[#4488] Re: Requesting addition to IRB (configurable standard output) — Sam Roberts <sroberts@...> 2005/02/26

Quoting drbrain@segment7.net, on Sat, Feb 26, 2005 at 02:43:31AM +0900:

[#4489] Re: Requesting addition to IRB (configurable standard output) — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2005/02/26

On 25 Feb 2005, at 16:03, Sam Roberts wrote:

Re: [PATCH] parse_c.rb: allow whitespace after function names

From: Tilman Sauerbeck <tilman@...>
Date: 2005-02-06 14:24:03 UTC
List: ruby-core #4373
Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> [2005-01-21 17:43]:
> In message "Re: [PATCH] parse_c.rb: allow whitespace after function names"
>     on Fri, 21 Jan 2005 02:48:55 +0900, Tilman Sauerbeck <tilman@code-monkey.de> writes:
> 
> |Is this the right mailing list for this kind of patch?
> 
> It should be.  If the maintainer didn't show up after a certain period
> of time, tell me.  I will submit.

So, can you please take care of these patches?
Or is RDoc considered frozen because there's no maintainer atm?

-- 
Regards,
Tilman

In This Thread