[#4346] Segmentation fault — Andrew Walrond <andrew@...>
FYI, just got this random unexpected crash
On 01 Feb 2005, at 07:33, Andrew Walrond wrote:
[#4360] Adding lastlog info to etc — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...>
Hi all,
[#4368] 'when (cond):' causes SyntaxError — "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nakahiro@...>
Hi,
[#4385] add color_set support to curses.c — Paul Duncan <pabs@...>
I'm not sure why this is missing from the Curses binding, but the
[#4392] HTTP Basic authentication for open_uri — Kent Sibilev <ksibilev@...>
Can somebody apply the following patch for open_uri in order to enable
[#4402] BUG: Struct.new(:a?).instance_methods — "Cs. Henk" <csaba-ml@...>
Hi, getting an ArgumentError with "NULL pointer given" doesn't seem to
[#4403] Re: Unknown OS X 10.2 Socket constants (+script to generate) — Sam Roberts <sroberts@...>
Quoteing matz@ruby-lang.org, on Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 01:21:18PM +0900:
[#4427] Re: windows socket connection freeze — ville.mattila@...
[#4432] curses + threads = non-blocking getch — William Morgan <wmorgan-ruby-core@...>
Hello experts,
In article <20050214231544.GE26414@masanjin.net>,
[#4439] Thread-safe Ruby Status? — Vincent Isambart <vincent.isambart@...>
Hello,
[#4448] add persistent history to irb — "David A. Black" <dblack@...>
Hi --
[#4453] bug in IRB with $_ matching a range of regexps — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>
> % ruby -v
[#4468] Re: Strange argc check in stable snapshot — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...>
> -----Original Message-----
[#4475] Re: Strange argc check in stable snapshot — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...>
> -----Original Message-----
[#4479] Requesting addition to IRB (configurable standard output) — Sascha Ebach <se@...>
Hello,
Quoting se@digitale-wertschoepfung.de, on Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 01:22:34AM +0900:
On 24 Feb 2005, at 19:51, Sam Roberts wrote:
Quoting drbrain@segment7.net, on Sat, Feb 26, 2005 at 02:43:31AM +0900:
On 25 Feb 2005, at 16:03, Sam Roberts wrote:
Quoting drbrain@segment7.net, on Sat, Feb 26, 2005 at 10:24:52AM +0900:
On 25 Feb 2005, at 18:55, Sam Roberts wrote:
Quoting drbrain@segment7.net, on Sat, Feb 26, 2005 at 03:49:49PM +0900:
Re: Strange argc check in stable snapshot
Sam wrote: > Wrote "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@qwest.com>, on Thu, Feb 24, 2005 at 01:04:25AM +0900: > >>>>Right. It is unnecessary check. Thank you. >>> >>>Maybe a good idea nonetheless. It might catch a bug someday. Nothing >>>*guarantees* that argc is nonnegative, not even for main(). > > > If you don't trust your runtime, nothing is guaranteed... and you are > on a slippery slope to insanity. The argument value in question (in array.c) is not set by the runtime. It just has the same name. See my earlier post for why it has nothing to do with trusting the runtime. Steve