[#4479] Requesting addition to IRB (configurable standard output) — Sascha Ebach <se@...>

Hello,

13 messages 2005/02/24
[#4482] Re: Requesting addition to IRB (configurable standard output) — Sam Roberts <sroberts@...> 2005/02/25

Quoting se@digitale-wertschoepfung.de, on Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 01:22:34AM +0900:

[#4483] Re: Requesting addition to IRB (configurable standard output) — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2005/02/25

On 24 Feb 2005, at 19:51, Sam Roberts wrote:

[#4488] Re: Requesting addition to IRB (configurable standard output) — Sam Roberts <sroberts@...> 2005/02/26

Quoting drbrain@segment7.net, on Sat, Feb 26, 2005 at 02:43:31AM +0900:

[#4489] Re: Requesting addition to IRB (configurable standard output) — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2005/02/26

On 25 Feb 2005, at 16:03, Sam Roberts wrote:

Re: [BUG] Segmentation fault

From: ville.mattila@...
Date: 2005-02-02 08:13:18 UTC
List: ruby-core #4356

>From: Andrew Walrond <andrew@walrond.org>
>Date: 02/01/2005 17:33:50
>Subject: [BUG] Segmentation fault
>
>FYI, just got this random unexpected crash
>
>/pkg/ruby.2/lib/ruby/1.8/rational.rb:296: [BUG] Segmentation fault
>ruby 1.8.2 (2004-12-25) [x86_64-linux]
>
>Hope it might mean something to someone :)
>
>Andrew Walrond
>

Hello Andrew,

What optmization level you are using when compiling ruby? If it is O3, then
this patch might help?

Fri Jan  7 18:03:35 2005  Tanaka Akira  <akr@m17n.org>

        * gc.c (mark_locations_array): avoid core dump with -O3.
          [ruby-dev:25424]


Also I think that we should study the information from
http://rubyforge.org/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1243&group_id=426&atid=1698

there might be subtle 64 bit problems that are hidden because we do not see
all compiler warnings...

- Ville




In This Thread

Prev Next