[#4479] Requesting addition to IRB (configurable standard output) — Sascha Ebach <se@...>

Hello,

13 messages 2005/02/24
[#4482] Re: Requesting addition to IRB (configurable standard output) — Sam Roberts <sroberts@...> 2005/02/25

Quoting se@digitale-wertschoepfung.de, on Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 01:22:34AM +0900:

[#4483] Re: Requesting addition to IRB (configurable standard output) — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2005/02/25

On 24 Feb 2005, at 19:51, Sam Roberts wrote:

[#4488] Re: Requesting addition to IRB (configurable standard output) — Sam Roberts <sroberts@...> 2005/02/26

Quoting drbrain@segment7.net, on Sat, Feb 26, 2005 at 02:43:31AM +0900:

[#4489] Re: Requesting addition to IRB (configurable standard output) — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2005/02/26

On 25 Feb 2005, at 16:03, Sam Roberts wrote:

Re: [PATCH] RDoc - show protected methods by default

From: Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
Date: 2005-02-11 04:15:48 UTC
List: ruby-core #4420
Hi,

In message "Re: [PATCH] RDoc - show protected methods by default"
    on Fri, 11 Feb 2005 03:00:01 +0900, Tilman Sauerbeck <tilman@code-monkey.de> writes:

|atm, RDoc will only show/document protected methods if the "-all" switch
|is set.
|
|IMHO it makes sense to include protected methods by default, too, since
|these belong to the visible API as well :)
|
|See the attached patch.

I know Dave Thomas is too busy to maintain RDoc, and it seems
reasonable for me, I will apply this patch.  If someone find this a
problem, revert the patch, or tell me so if you don't have an account.

							matz.

In This Thread

Prev Next