[#4479] Requesting addition to IRB (configurable standard output) — Sascha Ebach <se@...>

Hello,

13 messages 2005/02/24
[#4482] Re: Requesting addition to IRB (configurable standard output) — Sam Roberts <sroberts@...> 2005/02/25

Quoting se@digitale-wertschoepfung.de, on Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 01:22:34AM +0900:

[#4483] Re: Requesting addition to IRB (configurable standard output) — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2005/02/25

On 24 Feb 2005, at 19:51, Sam Roberts wrote:

[#4488] Re: Requesting addition to IRB (configurable standard output) — Sam Roberts <sroberts@...> 2005/02/26

Quoting drbrain@segment7.net, on Sat, Feb 26, 2005 at 02:43:31AM +0900:

[#4489] Re: Requesting addition to IRB (configurable standard output) — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2005/02/26

On 25 Feb 2005, at 16:03, Sam Roberts wrote:

Re: [BUG] Segmentation fault

From: Tanaka Akira <akr@...17n.org>
Date: 2005-02-02 08:24:29 UTC
List: ruby-core #4357
In article <OF73C3312D.12908D88-ONC2256F9C.002D2847-C2256F9C.002D7DD5@stonesoft.com>,
  ville.mattila@stonesoft.com writes:

> What optmization level you are using when compiling ruby? If it is O3, then
> this patch might help?
>
> Fri Jan  7 18:03:35 2005  Tanaka Akira  <akr@m17n.org>
>
>         * gc.c (mark_locations_array): avoid core dump with -O3.
>           [ruby-dev:25424]

It fix immediate core dump with -O3 on my environment.  But Ruby is
not robust enough with -O3, yet.  It got four core dumps after the
fix.

I don't recommend -O3 for usual use.
-- 
Tanaka Akira

In This Thread