[#4479] Requesting addition to IRB (configurable standard output) — Sascha Ebach <se@...>

Hello,

13 messages 2005/02/24
[#4482] Re: Requesting addition to IRB (configurable standard output) — Sam Roberts <sroberts@...> 2005/02/25

Quoting se@digitale-wertschoepfung.de, on Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 01:22:34AM +0900:

[#4483] Re: Requesting addition to IRB (configurable standard output) — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2005/02/25

On 24 Feb 2005, at 19:51, Sam Roberts wrote:

[#4488] Re: Requesting addition to IRB (configurable standard output) — Sam Roberts <sroberts@...> 2005/02/26

Quoting drbrain@segment7.net, on Sat, Feb 26, 2005 at 02:43:31AM +0900:

[#4489] Re: Requesting addition to IRB (configurable standard output) — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2005/02/26

On 25 Feb 2005, at 16:03, Sam Roberts wrote:

Re: [bug?] curses + threads = non-blocking getch

From: Tanaka Akira <akr@...17n.org>
Date: 2005-02-15 23:43:02 UTC
List: ruby-core #4437
In article <20050215225618.GE28426@masanjin.net>,
  William Morgan <wmorgan-ruby-core@masanjin.net> writes:

> I think it's a little surprising that the behavior of getch is different
> depending on whether there are threads or not, even if they've been
> created elsewhere in the program / libraries. But if you don't consider
> that a bug, that's fine.

I don't say it's a bug or not.  I leave the decision for the
maintainer of ext/curses.
-- 
Tanaka Akira

In This Thread

Prev Next