[#4479] Requesting addition to IRB (configurable standard output) — Sascha Ebach <se@...>

Hello,

13 messages 2005/02/24
[#4482] Re: Requesting addition to IRB (configurable standard output) — Sam Roberts <sroberts@...> 2005/02/25

Quoting se@digitale-wertschoepfung.de, on Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 01:22:34AM +0900:

[#4483] Re: Requesting addition to IRB (configurable standard output) — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2005/02/25

On 24 Feb 2005, at 19:51, Sam Roberts wrote:

[#4488] Re: Requesting addition to IRB (configurable standard output) — Sam Roberts <sroberts@...> 2005/02/26

Quoting drbrain@segment7.net, on Sat, Feb 26, 2005 at 02:43:31AM +0900:

[#4489] Re: Requesting addition to IRB (configurable standard output) — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2005/02/26

On 25 Feb 2005, at 16:03, Sam Roberts wrote:

Re: Function request: rb_raisef()

From: "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...>
Date: 2005-02-25 22:10:06 UTC
List: ruby-core #4487
> -----Original Message-----
> From: daz [mailto:dooby@d10.karoo.co.uk] 
> Sent: Friday, February 25, 2005 3:03 PM
> To: ruby-core@ruby-lang.org
> Subject: Re: Function request: rb_raisef()
> 
> 
> 
> From: "Berger, Daniel"
> 
> > Being the lazy sort that I am, I would like to be able to 
> do something 
> > like this:
> >
> > if(failure){
> >    rb_raisef(rb_eStandardError,"Something wrong with %i on device 
> > %s",x,dev); }
> >
> > Or is this impractical?
> 
> 
> IIUC, rb_raise already handles this.
> 
> [from PickAxe I]
> void   rb_raise(VALUE exception, const char *fmt, ...")
>   Raises an exception. The given string fmt and remaining 
> arguments are interpreted as with printf.
> 
> 
> daz

Well, dangit, I thought I tried that a while back and it didn't work.

Disregard.

Thanks.

Dan


In This Thread

Prev Next