[#4479] Requesting addition to IRB (configurable standard output) — Sascha Ebach <se@...>

Hello,

13 messages 2005/02/24
[#4482] Re: Requesting addition to IRB (configurable standard output) — Sam Roberts <sroberts@...> 2005/02/25

Quoting se@digitale-wertschoepfung.de, on Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 01:22:34AM +0900:

[#4483] Re: Requesting addition to IRB (configurable standard output) — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2005/02/25

On 24 Feb 2005, at 19:51, Sam Roberts wrote:

[#4488] Re: Requesting addition to IRB (configurable standard output) — Sam Roberts <sroberts@...> 2005/02/26

Quoting drbrain@segment7.net, on Sat, Feb 26, 2005 at 02:43:31AM +0900:

[#4489] Re: Requesting addition to IRB (configurable standard output) — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2005/02/26

On 25 Feb 2005, at 16:03, Sam Roberts wrote:

Re: 'when (cond):' causes SyntaxError

From: nobu.nokada@...
Date: 2005-02-07 16:24:33 UTC
List: ruby-core #4382
Hi,

At Tue, 8 Feb 2005 00:46:59 +0900,
Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote in [ruby-core:04381]:
> |> A bug.
> |
> |A patch, to separate EXPR_BEG to 2 cases; beginning of
> |expression a) which must be a pure value and b) which may not.
> 
> Wow, huge patch.  I think a simple one like this would work.

It simply prohibits labels.

  $ ./ruby -e 'h={foo:1}; p h'
  -e:1: parse error
  h={foo:1}; p h
         ^

-- 
Nobu Nakada

In This Thread