From: "Marrows, George A (GE Energy)" Date: 2005-02-10T02:17:10+09:00 Subject: Re: BUG: Struct.new(:a?).instance_methods >But isn't it better to instead change the implementation so that a?= is >allowed?... It would be also good to allow @foo? instance >variables. And if there's any chance of it, I'd really love to see x? local variables too. Like Mathieu, I've been inclined not to use ? methods because of the restrictions on the use of question marks with other identifiers. >> ruby -ve "x? = 1; p x?" ruby 1.8.2 (2004-07-29) [i386-mswin32] -e:1: syntax error x? = 1; p x? ^ Does anyone know what parsing issues stand in the way of these suggestions? (I must admit I haven't looked, sorry...) -- George