[#4065] Surprise in Time#sec — Steven Jenkins <steven.jenkins@...>
This bit me:
[#4067] Segfault in Thread#initialize / caller — Florian Gro<florgro@...>
Moin!
[#4076] Ruby/DL — Jamis Buck <jamis_buck@...>
I recently used Ruby/DL to create bindings to the SQLite3 embedded
On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 02:53:49AM +0900, Jamis Buck wrote:
>>>>> "P" == Paul Brannan <pbrannan@atdesk.com> writes:
On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 03:05:48AM +0900, ts wrote:
>>>>> "P" == Paul Brannan <pbrannan@atdesk.com> writes:
On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 01:10:34AM +0900, ts wrote:
>>>>> "P" == Paul Brannan <pbrannan@atdesk.com> writes:
On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 06:57:57PM +0900, ts wrote:
>>>>> "P" == Paul Brannan <pbrannan@atdesk.com> writes:
On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 12:06:16AM +0900, ts wrote:
>>>>> "P" == Paul Brannan <pbrannan@atdesk.com> writes:
ts wrote:
[#4116] Test::Unit::Collector::Dir won't work with code that modifies $LOAD_PATH — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net>
Any test code that depends upon modifications of $: fails when used
Hi,
On 11 Jan 2005, at 04:14, nobu.nokada@softhome.net wrote:
On 11 Jan 2005, at 09:39, Eric Hodel wrote:
On Sat, 15 Jan 2005 04:06:10 +0900, Eric Hodel <drbrain@segment7.net> wrote:
On Fri, 14 Jan 2005 23:48:58 -0500, Nathaniel Talbott
On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 17:17:14 -0500, Nathaniel Talbott
[#4146] The face of Unicode support in the future — Charles O Nutter <headius@...>
Hello Rubyists!
Hi,
Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> writes:
Paul Brannan <pbrannan@atdesk.com> writes:
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 11:53:48PM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi,
Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Jan 12, 2005 at 02:13:35PM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi,
[#4189] Authenticated proxy support for open-uri — Neil Kohl <nakohl@...>
Hello!
[#4232] Carriage return on shebang — Florian Gro<florgro@...>
Moin.
[#4242] tracer.rb: Do not list pseudo source lines of binary extensions — Florian Gro<florgro@...>
Moin.
[#4243] Patch that enables https in open-uri.rb — Michael Neumann <mneumann@...>
Hi,
In article <41E93F42.9090705@ntecs.de>,
Tanaka Akira wrote:
[#4269] Re: The face of Unicode support in the future — Wes Nakamura <wknaka@...>
Hi,
Hi,
Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi,
[#4296] parse_c.rb: allow whitespace after function names — Tilman Sauerbeck <tilman@...>
Hi,
Hi,
Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> [2005-01-21 17:43]:
[#4311] RFE: Enumerable#group_by, Array#^ — Florian Gro<florgro@...>
Moin.
[#4323] test/unit doesn't rescue a Exception — Tanaka Akira <akr@...17n.org>
test/unit doesn't rescue a Exception in a test method, as follows.
In article <87is5jb46q.fsf@serein.a02.aist.go.jp>,
On 9/1/06, Tanaka Akira <akr@fsij.org> wrote:
On Sep 2, 2006, at 6:34 PM, Nathaniel Talbott wrote:
In article <A604C0B3-95ED-4B9B-866C-79A2C7D5E3C4@segment7.net>,
On Sep 2, 2006, at 9:39 PM, Tanaka Akira wrote:
In article <622DAC7E-55DB-4854-B82B-A037CE9C75EF@segment7.net>,
In article <87ac5hv4bo.fsf@fsij.org>,
On Sep 3, 2006, at 8:21 AM, Tanaka Akira wrote:
[#4332] IO#clearerr missing in action — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net>
I wanted to implement tail(1) in ruby cleanly, but found the best I
[#4335] When will Object#type disappear? — "David A. Black" <dblack@...>
Hi --
[PATCH] parse_c.rb: allow whitespace after function names
Hi,
I mailed this RDoc patch to ruby-doc a few months ago, but didn't get
any feedback, although parts of it have been applied to CVS it seems.
Is this the right mailing list for this kind of patch?
(Updated patch so it works with Ruby 1.8.2. Also, extra whitespace
before the *closing* parenthesis isn't accepted for
rb_define_filetest_function(), rb_define_global_function() and
rb_define_module_function() etc. cause I didn't understand the regex that's
used ;)
----- Forwarded message from Tilman Sauerbeck <tilman@code-monkey.de> -----
Date: Sun, 1 Aug 2004 10:30:47 +0200
From: Tilman Sauerbeck <tilman@code-monkey.de>
Reply-To: ruby-doc@ruby-lang.org
Subject: [PATCH] parse_c.rb: allow whitespace after function names
To: ruby-doc@ruby-lang.org
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
Hi,
here's a patch for rdoc (as shipped with ruby 1.8.1) that allows the
use of whitespace between a function name and the opening parenthesis,
like this:
rb_define_class_under (mFoo, "Bar", rb_cObject);
^
Without the patch, rdoc wouldn't recognize the class definition because
it expects the opening parenthesis to appear just after the function
name.
I know omitting the space before the parenthesis is "ruby style", but
IMHO it makes sense to allow it for C code.
Please comment.
--
Regards,
Tilman
Attachments (1)
diff -aur ruby-1.8.2.orig/lib/rdoc/parsers/parse_c.rb ruby-1.8.2/lib/rdoc/parsers/parse_c.rb
--- ruby-1.8.2.orig/lib/rdoc/parsers/parse_c.rb 2004-09-09 04:48:32.000000000 +0200
+++ ruby-1.8.2/lib/rdoc/parsers/parse_c.rb 2005-01-20 18:48:21.084557296 +0100
@@ -249,13 +249,13 @@
############################################################
def do_classes
- @body.scan(/(\w+)\s* = \s*rb_define_module\(\s*"(\w+)"\s*\)/mx) do
+ @body.scan(/(\w+)\s* = \s*rb_define_module\s*\(\s*"(\w+)"\s*\)/mx) do
|var_name, class_name|
handle_class_module(var_name, "module", class_name, nil, nil)
end
# The '.' lets us handle SWIG-generated files
- @body.scan(/([\w\.]+)\s* = \s*rb_define_class
+ @body.scan(/([\w\.]+)\s* = \s*rb_define_class\s*
\(
\s*"(\w+)",
\s*(\w+)\s*
@@ -265,7 +265,7 @@
handle_class_module(var_name, "class", class_name, parent, nil)
end
- @body.scan(/(\w+)\s*=\s*boot_defclass\(\s*"(\w+?)",\s*(\w+?)\)/) do
+ @body.scan(/(\w+)\s*=\s*boot_defclass\s*\(\s*"(\w+?)",\s*(\w+?)\s*\)/) do
|var_name, class_name, parent|
parent = nil if parent == "0"
handle_class_module(var_name, "class", class_name, parent, nil)
@@ -281,12 +281,12 @@
handle_class_module(var_name, "module", class_name, nil, in_module)
end
- @body.scan(/([\w\.]+)\s* = \s*rb_define_class_under
+ @body.scan(/([\w\.]+)\s* = \s*rb_define_class_under\s*
\(
\s*(\w+),
\s*"(\w+)",
\s*(\w+)\s*
- \)/mx) do
+ \s*\)/mx) do
|var_name, in_module, class_name, parent|
handle_class_module(var_name, "class", class_name, parent, in_module)
@@ -305,7 +305,7 @@
module_function |
private_method
)
- \(\s*([\w\.]+),
+ \s*\(\s*([\w\.]+),
\s*"([^"]+)",
\s*(?:RUBY_METHOD_FUNC\(|VALUEFUNC\()?(\w+)\)?,
\s*(-?\w+)\s*\)
@@ -325,7 +325,7 @@
meth_body, param_count, source_file)
end
- @body.scan(%r{rb_define_global_function\(
+ @body.scan(%r{rb_define_global_function\s*\(
\s*"([^"]+)",
\s*(?:RUBY_METHOD_FUNC\(|VALUEFUNC\()?(\w+)\)?,
\s*(-?\w+)\s*\)
@@ -336,7 +336,7 @@
meth_body, param_count, source_file)
end
- @body.scan(/define_filetest_function\(
+ @body.scan(/define_filetest_function\s*\(
\s*"([^"]+)",
\s*(?:RUBY_METHOD_FUNC\(|VALUEFUNC\()?(\w+)\)?,
\s*(-?\w+)\s*\)/xm) do #"
@@ -350,7 +350,7 @@
############################################################
def do_aliases
- @body.scan(%r{rb_define_alias\(\s*(\w+),\s*"([^"]+)",\s*"([^"]+)"\s*\)}m) do
+ @body.scan(%r{rb_define_alias\s*\(\s*(\w+),\s*"([^"]+)",\s*"([^"]+)"\s*\)}m) do
|var_name, new_name, old_name|
@stats.num_methods += 1
class_name = @known_classes[var_name] || var_name
@@ -482,7 +482,7 @@
# Look for includes of the form
# rb_include_module(rb_cArray, rb_mEnumerable);
def do_includes
- @body.scan(/rb_include_module\(\s*(\w+?),\s*(\w+?)\s*\)/) do |c,m|
+ @body.scan(/rb_include_module\s*\(\s*(\w+?),\s*(\w+?)\s*\)/) do |c,m|
if cls = @classes[c]
m = KNOWN_CLASSES[m] || m
cls.add_include(Include.new(m, ""))