[#4076] Ruby/DL — Jamis Buck <jamis_buck@...>

I recently used Ruby/DL to create bindings to the SQLite3 embedded

40 messages 2005/01/03
[#4096] Re: Ruby/DL — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2005/01/04

On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 02:53:49AM +0900, Jamis Buck wrote:

[#4099] Re: Ruby/DL — ts <decoux@...> 2005/01/04

>>>>> "P" == Paul Brannan <pbrannan@atdesk.com> writes:

[#4119] Re: Ruby/DL — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2005/01/05

On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 03:05:48AM +0900, ts wrote:

[#4120] Re: Ruby/DL — ts <decoux@...> 2005/01/05

>>>>> "P" == Paul Brannan <pbrannan@atdesk.com> writes:

[#4125] Re: Ruby/DL — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2005/01/05

On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 01:10:34AM +0900, ts wrote:

[#4116] Test::Unit::Collector::Dir won't work with code that modifies $LOAD_PATH — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net>

Any test code that depends upon modifications of $: fails when used

10 messages 2005/01/05

[#4146] The face of Unicode support in the future — Charles O Nutter <headius@...>

Hello Rubyists!

47 messages 2005/01/06
[#4152] Re: The face of Unicode support in the future — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2005/01/07

Hi,

[#4167] Re: The face of Unicode support in the future — Christian Neukirchen <chneukirchen@...> 2005/01/09

Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> writes:

[#4175] Re: The face of Unicode support in the future — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2005/01/10

Hi,

[#4186] Re: The face of Unicode support in the future — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2005/01/11

On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 11:53:48PM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#4192] Re: The face of Unicode support in the future — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2005/01/12

Hi,

[#4269] Re: The face of Unicode support in the future — Wes Nakamura <wknaka@...>

19 messages 2005/01/18
[#4270] Re: The face of Unicode support in the future — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2005/01/18

Hi,

[#4275] Re: The face of Unicode support in the future — Wes Nakamura <wknaka@...> 2005/01/19

[#4323] test/unit doesn't rescue a Exception — Tanaka Akira <akr@...17n.org>

test/unit doesn't rescue a Exception in a test method, as follows.

14 messages 2005/01/27
[#8773] Re: test/unit doesn't rescue a Exception — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2006/09/02

In article <87is5jb46q.fsf@serein.a02.aist.go.jp>,

[#8776] Re: test/unit doesn't rescue a Exception — "Nathaniel Talbott" <ntalbott@...> 2006/09/03

On 9/1/06, Tanaka Akira <akr@fsij.org> wrote:

[#8777] Re: test/unit doesn't rescue a Exception — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2006/09/03

On Sep 2, 2006, at 6:34 PM, Nathaniel Talbott wrote:

Re: The face of Unicode support in the future

From: Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
Date: 2005-01-20 02:23:27 UTC
List: ruby-core #4287
Hi,

In message "Re: The face of Unicode support in the future"
    on Thu, 20 Jan 2005 10:28:14 +0900, Wes Nakamura <wknaka@pobox.com> writes:

|Yes, I'm getting quite confused! :)

Sorry for confusion.

|I'm looking at:
|http://www.unicode.org/versions/Unicode4.0.0/ch03.pdf
|which is not an especially easy read.
|
|    Unicode codespace: 0-10ffff (I suppose you could call this the unicode
|        character "set")
|
|    Codepoint: a value in the unicode codespace
|
|    Encoded character: an association or mapping between an abstract
|        character and a codepoint
|
|    Code unit: bit combination that can represent a unit of encoded text
|        utf-8 has 8-bit code units, and utf-16 has 16-bit code units
|
|The unicode codepoint and utf-16-encoded values are the same for I
|believe 0-ffff.
|
|So (these are all the same character - a katakana "su"):
|
|"\x30\xb9"     - unicode codespace, utf-16 encoding, codepoint 30b9
|"\xe3\x82\xb9" - unicode codespace, utf-8 encoding, codepoint 30b9

raw="\x30\xb9"
raw.length  => 2
raw.explode => [0x30, 0xb9]

su16be="\x30\xb9"
su16be.encoding="utf16be"
su16be.length  => 1
su16be.explode => [0x30b9]

su8="\xe3\x82\xb9"
su8.encoding="utf8"
su8.length  => 1
su8.explode => [0x30b9]

I hope this describe the idea.

							matz.

In This Thread