[#8815] Segfault in libc strlen, via rb_str_new2 — "Sean E. Russell" <ser@...>

Howdy,

12 messages 2006/09/09
[#8817] Re: Segfault in libc strlen, via rb_str_new2 — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2006/09/09

On Sep 8, 2006, at 10:10 PM, Sean E. Russell wrote:

Re: test/unit doesn't rescue a Exception

From: Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net>
Date: 2006-09-03 06:29:07 UTC
List: ruby-core #8779
On Sep 2, 2006, at 9:39 PM, Tanaka Akira wrote:

> In article <A604C0B3-95ED-4B9B-866C-79A2C7D5E3C4@segment7.net>,
>   Eric Hodel <drbrain@segment7.net> writes:
>
>> I think Interrupt should be re-raised.  If a user wants to explicitly
>> test for ^C behavior they can catch it themselves.
>
> Fair enough.
>
> Not only Interrupt but also all SignalException should be re-raised
> because `kill <test-pid>' terminates the process.

What about Timeout::Error?

-- 
Eric Hodel - drbrain@segment7.net - http://blog.segment7.net
This implementation is HODEL-HASH-9600 compliant

http://trackmap.robotcoop.com



In This Thread