[#4065] Surprise in Time#sec — Steven Jenkins <steven.jenkins@...>
This bit me:
7 messages
2005/01/01
[#4067] Segfault in Thread#initialize / caller — Florian Gro<florgro@...>
Moin!
7 messages
2005/01/01
[#4076] Ruby/DL — Jamis Buck <jamis_buck@...>
I recently used Ruby/DL to create bindings to the SQLite3 embedded
40 messages
2005/01/03
[#4096] Re: Ruby/DL
— Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...>
2005/01/04
On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 02:53:49AM +0900, Jamis Buck wrote:
[#4099] Re: Ruby/DL
— ts <decoux@...>
2005/01/04
>>>>> "P" == Paul Brannan <pbrannan@atdesk.com> writes:
[#4119] Re: Ruby/DL
— Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...>
2005/01/05
On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 03:05:48AM +0900, ts wrote:
[#4120] Re: Ruby/DL
— ts <decoux@...>
2005/01/05
>>>>> "P" == Paul Brannan <pbrannan@atdesk.com> writes:
[#4125] Re: Ruby/DL
— Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...>
2005/01/05
On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 01:10:34AM +0900, ts wrote:
[#4133] Re: Ruby/DL
— ts <decoux@...>
2005/01/06
>>>>> "P" == Paul Brannan <pbrannan@atdesk.com> writes:
[#4140] Re: Ruby/DL
— Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...>
2005/01/06
On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 06:57:57PM +0900, ts wrote:
[#4141] Re: Ruby/DL
— ts <decoux@...>
2005/01/06
>>>>> "P" == Paul Brannan <pbrannan@atdesk.com> writes:
[#4143] Re: Ruby/DL
— Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...>
2005/01/06
On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 12:06:16AM +0900, ts wrote:
[#4144] Re: Ruby/DL
— ts <decoux@...>
2005/01/06
>>>>> "P" == Paul Brannan <pbrannan@atdesk.com> writes:
[#4145] Re: Ruby/DL
— Takaaki Tateishi <ttate@...>
2005/01/06
ts wrote:
[#4116] Test::Unit::Collector::Dir won't work with code that modifies $LOAD_PATH — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net>
Any test code that depends upon modifications of $: fails when used
10 messages
2005/01/05
[#4185] Re: Test::Unit::Collector::Dir won't work with code that modifies $LOAD_PATH
— nobu.nokada@...
2005/01/11
Hi,
[#4188] Re: Test::Unit::Collector::Dir won't work with code that modifies $LOAD_PATH
— Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net>
2005/01/11
On 11 Jan 2005, at 04:14, nobu.nokada@softhome.net wrote:
[#4231] Re: Test::Unit::Collector::Dir won't work with code that modifies $LOAD_PATH
— Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net>
2005/01/14
On 11 Jan 2005, at 09:39, Eric Hodel wrote:
[#4240] Re: Test::Unit::Collector::Dir won't work with code that modifies $LOAD_PATH
— Nathaniel Talbott <ntalbott@...>
2005/01/15
On Sat, 15 Jan 2005 04:06:10 +0900, Eric Hodel <drbrain@segment7.net> wrote:
[#4325] Re: Test::Unit::Collector::Dir won't work with code that modifies $LOAD_PATH
— Nathaniel Talbott <ntalbott@...>
2005/01/27
On Fri, 14 Jan 2005 23:48:58 -0500, Nathaniel Talbott
[#4331] Re: Test::Unit::Collector::Dir won't work with code that modifies $LOAD_PATH
— Nathaniel Talbott <ntalbott@...>
2005/01/30
On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 17:17:14 -0500, Nathaniel Talbott
[#4146] The face of Unicode support in the future — Charles O Nutter <headius@...>
Hello Rubyists!
47 messages
2005/01/06
[#4152] Re: The face of Unicode support in the future
— Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
2005/01/07
Hi,
[#4167] Re: The face of Unicode support in the future
— Christian Neukirchen <chneukirchen@...>
2005/01/09
Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> writes:
[#4201] Re: The face of Unicode support in the future
— Christian Neukirchen <chneukirchen@...>
2005/01/12
Paul Brannan <pbrannan@atdesk.com> writes:
[#4175] Re: The face of Unicode support in the future
— Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
2005/01/10
Hi,
[#4186] Re: The face of Unicode support in the future
— Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...>
2005/01/11
On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 11:53:48PM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#4192] Re: The face of Unicode support in the future
— Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
2005/01/12
Hi,
[#4195] Re: The face of Unicode support in the future
— Florian Gro<florgro@...>
2005/01/12
Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#4196] Re: The face of Unicode support in the future
— Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
2005/01/12
Hi,
[#4218] Re: The face of Unicode support in the future
— Eivind Eklund <eivind@...>
2005/01/13
On Wed, Jan 12, 2005 at 02:13:35PM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#4219] Re: The face of Unicode support in the future
— Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
2005/01/13
Hi,
[#4153] Re: The face of Unicode support in the future
— Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...>
2005/01/07
[#4189] Authenticated proxy support for open-uri — Neil Kohl <nakohl@...>
Hello!
3 messages
2005/01/11
[#4232] Carriage return on shebang — Florian Gro<florgro@...>
Moin.
6 messages
2005/01/14
[#4242] tracer.rb: Do not list pseudo source lines of binary extensions — Florian Gro<florgro@...>
Moin.
5 messages
2005/01/15
[#4243] Patch that enables https in open-uri.rb — Michael Neumann <mneumann@...>
Hi,
8 messages
2005/01/15
[#4248] Re: Patch that enables https in open-uri.rb
— Tanaka Akira <akr@...17n.org>
2005/01/16
In article <41E93F42.9090705@ntecs.de>,
[#4259] Re: Patch that enables https in open-uri.rb
— Michael Neumann <mneumann@...>
2005/01/16
Tanaka Akira wrote:
[#4269] Re: The face of Unicode support in the future — Wes Nakamura <wknaka@...>
19 messages
2005/01/18
[#4270] Re: The face of Unicode support in the future
— Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
2005/01/18
Hi,
[#4275] Re: The face of Unicode support in the future
— Wes Nakamura <wknaka@...>
2005/01/19
[#4278] Re: The face of Unicode support in the future
— Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
2005/01/19
Hi,
[#4279] Re: The face of Unicode support in the future
— Florian Gro<florgro@...>
2005/01/19
Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#4282] Re: The face of Unicode support in the future
— Wes Nakamura <wknaka@...>
2005/01/19
[#4285] Re: The face of Unicode support in the future
— Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
2005/01/20
Hi,
[#4296] parse_c.rb: allow whitespace after function names — Tilman Sauerbeck <tilman@...>
Hi,
8 messages
2005/01/20
[#4299] Re: [PATCH] parse_c.rb: allow whitespace after function names
— Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
2005/01/21
Hi,
[#4301] Re: [PATCH] parse_c.rb: allow whitespace after function names
— Tilman Sauerbeck <tilman@...>
2005/01/21
Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> [2005-01-21 17:43]:
[#4311] RFE: Enumerable#group_by, Array#^ — Florian Gro<florgro@...>
Moin.
7 messages
2005/01/24
[#4323] test/unit doesn't rescue a Exception — Tanaka Akira <akr@...17n.org>
test/unit doesn't rescue a Exception in a test method, as follows.
14 messages
2005/01/27
[#8773] Re: test/unit doesn't rescue a Exception
— Tanaka Akira <akr@...>
2006/09/02
In article <87is5jb46q.fsf@serein.a02.aist.go.jp>,
[#8776] Re: test/unit doesn't rescue a Exception
— "Nathaniel Talbott" <ntalbott@...>
2006/09/03
On 9/1/06, Tanaka Akira <akr@fsij.org> wrote:
[#8777] Re: test/unit doesn't rescue a Exception
— Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net>
2006/09/03
On Sep 2, 2006, at 6:34 PM, Nathaniel Talbott wrote:
[#8778] Re: test/unit doesn't rescue a Exception
— Tanaka Akira <akr@...>
2006/09/03
In article <A604C0B3-95ED-4B9B-866C-79A2C7D5E3C4@segment7.net>,
[#8779] Re: test/unit doesn't rescue a Exception
— Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net>
2006/09/03
On Sep 2, 2006, at 9:39 PM, Tanaka Akira wrote:
[#8780] Re: test/unit doesn't rescue a Exception
— Tanaka Akira <akr@...>
2006/09/03
In article <622DAC7E-55DB-4854-B82B-A037CE9C75EF@segment7.net>,
[#8783] Re: test/unit doesn't rescue a Exception
— Tanaka Akira <akr@...>
2006/09/03
In article <87ac5hv4bo.fsf@fsij.org>,
[#8784] Re: test/unit doesn't rescue a Exception
— Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net>
2006/09/03
On Sep 3, 2006, at 8:21 AM, Tanaka Akira wrote:
[#4332] IO#clearerr missing in action — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net>
I wanted to implement tail(1) in ruby cleanly, but found the best I
4 messages
2005/01/30
[#4335] When will Object#type disappear? — "David A. Black" <dblack@...>
Hi --
2 messages
2005/01/31
Test::Unit::Collector::Dir won't work with code that modifies $LOAD_PATH
From:
Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net>
Date:
2005-01-05 08:00:00 UTC
List:
ruby-core #4116
Any test code that depends upon modifications of $: fails when used with test/unit's directory collector. I discovered this with Rake 0.4.15 (which uses testrb, which invokes the directory collector) and Rails. The dir collector dups $:, then in an ensure, replaces $: with the dup'd copy, undoing any changes of $: inside the dir collector. I have two proposed patches, one that deletes only the temporary addition to $:, and one that does not delete the temporary addition. I prefer the "$:.delete_at $:.rindex(dir)" cleanup patch, I think it has fewer unintended consequences for the user. -- Eric Hodel - drbrain@segment7.net - http://segment7.net FEC2 57F1 D465 EB15 5D6E 7C11 332A 551C 796C 9F04
Attachments (3)
dir.rb.dont_cleanup.patch
(810 Bytes, text/x-diff)
Index: lib/test/unit/collector/dir.rb
===================================================================
RCS file: /src/ruby/lib/test/unit/collector/dir.rb,v
retrieving revision 1.4.2.1
diff -u -r1.4.2.1 dir.rb
--- lib/test/unit/collector/dir.rb 19 Dec 2004 02:01:59 -0000 1.4.2.1
+++ lib/test/unit/collector/dir.rb 5 Jan 2005 02:24:17 -0000
@@ -75,7 +75,6 @@
end
def collect_file(name, suites, already_gathered)
- loadpath = $:.dup
dir = File.dirname(File.expand_path(name))
$:.unshift(dir) unless $:.first == dir
if(@req)
@@ -84,8 +83,6 @@
require(name)
end
find_test_cases(already_gathered).each{|t| add_suite(suites, t.suite)}
- ensure
- $:.replace(loadpath)
end
end
end
dir.rb.cleanup.patch
(822 Bytes, text/x-diff)
Index: lib/test/unit/collector/dir.rb
===================================================================
RCS file: /src/ruby/lib/test/unit/collector/dir.rb,v
retrieving revision 1.4.2.1
diff -u -r1.4.2.1 dir.rb
--- lib/test/unit/collector/dir.rb 19 Dec 2004 02:01:59 -0000 1.4.2.1
+++ lib/test/unit/collector/dir.rb 5 Jan 2005 04:05:53 -0000
@@ -75,7 +75,6 @@
end
def collect_file(name, suites, already_gathered)
- loadpath = $:.dup
dir = File.dirname(File.expand_path(name))
$:.unshift(dir) unless $:.first == dir
if(@req)
@@ -85,7 +84,7 @@
end
find_test_cases(already_gathered).each{|t| add_suite(suites, t.suite)}
ensure
- $:.replace(loadpath)
+ $:.delete_at $:.rindex(dir)
end
end
end
PGP.sig
(186 Bytes, application/pgp-signature)