[#4076] Ruby/DL — Jamis Buck <jamis_buck@...>

I recently used Ruby/DL to create bindings to the SQLite3 embedded

40 messages 2005/01/03
[#4096] Re: Ruby/DL — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2005/01/04

On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 02:53:49AM +0900, Jamis Buck wrote:

[#4099] Re: Ruby/DL — ts <decoux@...> 2005/01/04

>>>>> "P" == Paul Brannan <pbrannan@atdesk.com> writes:

[#4119] Re: Ruby/DL — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2005/01/05

On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 03:05:48AM +0900, ts wrote:

[#4120] Re: Ruby/DL — ts <decoux@...> 2005/01/05

>>>>> "P" == Paul Brannan <pbrannan@atdesk.com> writes:

[#4125] Re: Ruby/DL — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2005/01/05

On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 01:10:34AM +0900, ts wrote:

[#4116] Test::Unit::Collector::Dir won't work with code that modifies $LOAD_PATH — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net>

Any test code that depends upon modifications of $: fails when used

10 messages 2005/01/05

[#4146] The face of Unicode support in the future — Charles O Nutter <headius@...>

Hello Rubyists!

47 messages 2005/01/06
[#4152] Re: The face of Unicode support in the future — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2005/01/07

Hi,

[#4167] Re: The face of Unicode support in the future — Christian Neukirchen <chneukirchen@...> 2005/01/09

Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> writes:

[#4175] Re: The face of Unicode support in the future — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2005/01/10

Hi,

[#4186] Re: The face of Unicode support in the future — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2005/01/11

On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 11:53:48PM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#4192] Re: The face of Unicode support in the future — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2005/01/12

Hi,

[#4269] Re: The face of Unicode support in the future — Wes Nakamura <wknaka@...>

19 messages 2005/01/18
[#4270] Re: The face of Unicode support in the future — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2005/01/18

Hi,

[#4275] Re: The face of Unicode support in the future — Wes Nakamura <wknaka@...> 2005/01/19

[#4323] test/unit doesn't rescue a Exception — Tanaka Akira <akr@...17n.org>

test/unit doesn't rescue a Exception in a test method, as follows.

14 messages 2005/01/27
[#8773] Re: test/unit doesn't rescue a Exception — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2006/09/02

In article <87is5jb46q.fsf@serein.a02.aist.go.jp>,

[#8776] Re: test/unit doesn't rescue a Exception — "Nathaniel Talbott" <ntalbott@...> 2006/09/03

On 9/1/06, Tanaka Akira <akr@fsij.org> wrote:

[#8777] Re: test/unit doesn't rescue a Exception — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2006/09/03

On Sep 2, 2006, at 6:34 PM, Nathaniel Talbott wrote:

Re: [PATCH] parse_c.rb: allow whitespace after function names

From: Tilman Sauerbeck <tilman@...>
Date: 2005-01-21 18:37:56 UTC
List: ruby-core #4301
Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> [2005-01-21 17:43]:
> In message "Re: [PATCH] parse_c.rb: allow whitespace after function names"
>     on Fri, 21 Jan 2005 02:48:55 +0900, Tilman Sauerbeck <tilman@code-monkey.de> writes:
> 
> |Is this the right mailing list for this kind of patch?
> 
> It should be.  If the maintainer didn't show up after a certain period
> of time, tell me.  I will submit.

Excellent :)

So here's another RDoc patch, this one adds support for private comments
in the "simple" parser (just copied the code from the rb parser ;D).

-- 
Regards,
Tilman

Attachments (1)

rdoc-simple_parser_private_comments.diff (597 Bytes, text/x-diff)
diff -aur ruby-1.8.2.orig/lib/rdoc/parsers/parse_simple.rb ruby-1.8.2/lib/rdoc/parsers/parse_simple.rb
--- ruby-1.8.2.orig/lib/rdoc/parsers/parse_simple.rb	2004-01-02 07:01:12.000000000 +0100
+++ ruby-1.8.2/lib/rdoc/parsers/parse_simple.rb	2005-01-20 15:26:32.308674448 +0100
@@ -30,8 +30,12 @@
     
     def scan
       #    @body.gsub(/^(\s\n)+/, '')
-      @top_level.comment = @body
+      @top_level.comment = remove_private_comments(@body)
       @top_level
     end
+
+    def remove_private_comments(comment)
+      comment.gsub(/^--.*?^\+\+/m, '').sub(/^--.*/m, '')
+    end
   end
 end

In This Thread